Medicine Studies

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 175–184 | Cite as

Revisiting Marey’s Applications of Scientific Moving Image Technologies in the Context of Bergson’s Philosophy: Audio-Visual Mediation and the Experience of Time



This paper revisits some early applications of audio-visual imaging technologies used in physiology in a dialogue with reflections on Henri Bergson’s philosophy. It focuses on the aspects of time and memory in relation to spatial representations of movement measurements and critically discusses them from the perspective of the observing participant and the public exhibitions of scientific films. Departing from an audio-visual example, this paper is informed by a thick description of the philosophical implications and contemporary discourses surrounding the scientific inventions, technologies and theories of moving image technologies, representations of time, and the measurement of bodies in motion such as those by the French physiologist Étienne-Jules Marey. The application of Bergson’s thinking will show how the scientific graphing and representations of the body through technologies inevitably stand in tension with the limits and potentials of the ‘human apparatus’ and its abilities, filters and internalised processes of perception, memory and consciousness. It proposes an ontological approach to scientific imaging technologies and a critical engagement with the ‘realism’ debate in the discourse of audio-visual media.


Audio-visual mediation Movement studies Time measurement and experience Perception Philosophy of mind Intuition 


  1. Bergson, Henri. [1913] 2001. Time and free will: An essay on the immediate data of consciousness (trans: Pogson, F.L.). Mineola, New York: Dover Publications. [French original: 1889. Essai Sur les Données Immédiates de la Conscience. Paris: Les Presses Universitaires de France].Google Scholar
  2. Bergson, Henri. [1912] 1999. An introduction to metaphysics (trans: Hulme, T.E.). Indianapolis, Cambridge: Hackett Publishing. [French original: ‘Introduction à la Métaphysique’ in Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, January 1903].Google Scholar
  3. Bergson, Henri. [1911] 1998. Creative evolution (trans: Mitchell, A.). Mineola, New York: Dover Publications. [French original: 1907. L’Évolution Créatrice. Paris: Alcan].Google Scholar
  4. Bergson, Henri. [1911] 1991. Matter and Memory (trans: Paul, N.M and Palmer, W.S). New York: Zone Books. [French original: 1896. Matière et Mémoire: Essai sur la Relation du Corps à l’Esprit. Paris: Alcan].Google Scholar
  5. Blassnigg, Martha. 2009. Time, memory, consciousness and the cinema experience: Revisiting ideas on matter and spirit. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  6. Braun, Marta. 1992. Picturing time. The work of Etienne Jules Marey, 1830–1904. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Canguilhem, Denis. 2006. ‘La Rétine du Savant. La Photographie Scientifique à l’Epreuve du Regard. In E.J. Marey: Actes du Colloque du Centenaire, ed. Dominique de Font-Réaulx, Thierry Lefebvre, and Laurent Mannoni, 145–158. Paris: Arcadia.Google Scholar
  8. Crary, Jonathan. 1990. Techniques of the observer: On vision and modernity in the nineteenth century. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Danius, Sara. 2002. The senses of modernism: Technology perception and aesthetics. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Doane, Mary.Ann. 2002. The emergence of cinematic time: Modernity contingency, the archive. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gunning, Tom. 1997. From the kaleidoscope to the X-ray: Urban spectatorship, Poe, Benjamin, traffic in souls (1913). Wide Angle 19(4): 25–61.Google Scholar
  12. Harding, Colin., and Simon. Popple. 1996. In the kingdom of the shadows: A companion to early cinema. London: Cygnus Arts.Google Scholar
  13. Landecker, Hannah. 2006. Microcinematography and the history of science and film. Isis 97: 121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Landecker, Hannah. 2005. Cellular features: Microcinematography and early film theory. Critical Inquiry 31: 903–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Larsen, Egon. 1947. Inventor’s scrapbook. London, Aylesbury: Hazell, Watson &Viney.Google Scholar
  16. Lefebvre, Thierry. 2006. Film Scientifique et Grand Public. Une Rencontre Différée’. In E.J. Marey: Actes du Colloque du Centenaire, ed. Dominique. de Font-Réaulx, Thierry Lefebvre, and Laurent Mannoni, 159–168. Paris: Arcadia.Google Scholar
  17. Lefebvre, Thierry. 2004. Le Chair et le Celluloïd: Le Cinéma Chirurgical du Docteur Doyen. Paris, Brionne: Jean Doyen Editeur.Google Scholar
  18. Mannoni, Laurent. 2006. Marey Cineaste. In E.J. Marey: Actes du Colloque du Centenaire, ed. Dominique. de Font-Réaulx, Thierry Lefebvre, and Laurent Mannoni, 15–36. Paris: Arcadia.Google Scholar
  19. Marey, Étienne-Jules. [1894] 1895. Movement. The results and possibilities of photography (trans: Pritchard, Eric). London: William Heinemann. [French original: Le Movement].Google Scholar
  20. Marey, Étienne-Jules.1884. Sur l’épidémie de cholera. Bulletin de l’Académie de médecine, 2ème série, tome XIII(34): 1113–1120.Google Scholar
  21. Opinel, Annick. 2006. Cinéma et recherche à l’Institut Pasteur dans la première moitié du XXe siècle. In E.J. Marey: Actes du Colloque du Centenaire, ed. Dominique de Font-Réaulx, Thierry Lefebvre, and Laurent Mannoni, 169–177. Paris: Arcadia.Google Scholar
  22. Punt, Michael. 2005. ‘? What shall we do with all those old bytes? Saving the cinematic imagination in the postdigital era’. Design Issues 21(2): 48–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Punt, Michael. 2000. Early cinema and the technological imaginary. Trowbridge, Wiltshire: Cromwell Press.Google Scholar
  24. Rony, Fatimah Tobing. 1996. The third eye race, cinema, and ethnographic spectacle. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Rossell, Deac. 1995. A Chronology of Cinema 1889–1896. In Film History 7(2): 115–236.Google Scholar
  26. Stafford, Barbara Maria. 2007. Echo objects the cognitive work of images. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Stafford, Barbara Maria. 1999. Visual analogy: Consciousness as the art of connecting. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Stafford, Barbara Maria. 1997. Good looking the virtue of images. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Stafford, Barbara Maria. 1994. Artful science. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Stafford, Barbara Maria. 1991. Body criticism imaging the unseen in enlightenment art and medicine. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Tsivian, Yuri. 1996. Media Fantasies and Penetrating Vision: Some Links between X-rays, the Microscope, and Film. In Laboratory of dreams: The Russian avant-garde and cultural experiment, ed. John E. Bowlt, and Olga. Matich, 81–99. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Transtechnology ResearchUniversity of PlymouthDrake Circus, Plymouth, DevonUK

Personalised recommendations