Predictive Genetic Testing, Autonomy and Responsibility for Future Health
Individual autonomy is a concept highly appreciated in modern Western societies. Its significance is reflected by the central importance and broad use of the model of informed consent in all fields of medicine. In predictive genetic testing, individual autonomy gains particular importance, for what is in focus here is not so much a concrete medical treatment but rather options for taking preventive measures and the influence that the test results have on long-term lifestyle and preferences. Based on an analysis of autonomy-related issues in predictive genetic diagnosis and genetic screening programmes, this contribution stresses the central relevance of a broad notion of autonomy for the discussion of ethical issues raised in connection with predictive genetic testing and genetic screening programmes. Only against the background of such a broad notion of autonomy, which stresses not only free and informed decision-making but also the relevance of long-term prospects for leading a self-determined life in familial and social contexts, can the manifold autonomy-related issues linked to predictive genetic testing be given adequate consideration.
KeywordsGenetics, medical Personal autonomy Informed consent Ethics, medical Bioethics
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists & American College of Medical Genetics. 2001. Preconception and prenatal carrier screening for cystic fibrosis: Clinical and laboratory guideline. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.Google Scholar
- Anderson, G. 1999. Nondirectiveness in prenatal genetics: Patients read between the lines. Nursing Ethics 6: 126–136.Google Scholar
- Ball, David., Audrey. Tyler, and Peter. Harper. 1994. Predictive testing of adults and children. In Genetic counselling: Practice and principles, ed. A. Clarke, 63–86. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Berlin, Isaiah. 1969. ‘Two concepts of liberty. In Four essays on liberty, ed. I. Berlin, 118–172. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Chadwick, Ruth. 1997. The philosophy of the right to know and the right not to know. In The right to know and the right not to know, ed. R. Chadwick, M. Levitt, and D. Shickle, 13–22. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Council of Europe (1997) ‘Convention on human rights and biomedicine’. Available at: http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Treaties/Html/164.htm.
- Dawson, Angus., and Marcel. Verweij. 2007. Introduction: Ethics, prevention, and public health. In Ethics, Prevention, and Public Health, ed. A. Dawson, and M. Verweij, 1–12. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Faden, Ruth.R., and Tom.L. Beauchamp. 1986. A history and theory of informed consent. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Feinberg, Joel. 1980. The child’s right to an open future. In Whose child? Children’s rights, parental authority, and state power, ed. W. Aiken, and H. LaFollette, 124–153. Totowa: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Fletcher, Joseph. 1988. The ethics of genetic control. Ending reproductive roulette. Buffalo & New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
- Foster, C., D.G.R. Evans, R. Eeles, D. Eccles, S. Ashley, L. Brooks, R. Davidson, J. Mackay, P.J. Morrison, and M. Watson. 2002. Predictive testing for BCRA1/2: Attributes, risk perception and management in a multi-centre clinical cohort. British Journal of Cancer 86: 1209–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hildt, Elisabeth. 2006. Autonomie in der biomedizinischen Ethik. Genetische Diagnostik und selbstbestimmte Lebensgestaltung. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
- Husted, Jörgen. 1997. Autonomy and a right not to know. In The right to know and the right not to know, ed. R. Chadwick, M. Levitt, and D. Shickle, 55–68. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Kielstein, R., and H.M. Sass. 1992. Right not to know or duty to know? Prenatal screening for polycystic renal disease. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17: 395–405.Google Scholar
- Lilani, A. 2005. Ethical issues and policy analysis for genetic testing: Huntington’s disease as a paradigm for diseases with a late onset. Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 11(2): 28–34.Google Scholar
- Marteau, T.M., and R.T. Croyle. 1998. The new genetics: Psychological responses to genetic testing. British Medical Journal 316: 693–696.Google Scholar
- Nijsingh, Niels. 2007. Informed consent and the expansion of newborn screening. In Ethics, prevention, and public health, ed. A. Dawson, and M. Verweij, 198–212. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Ossa, D.F., and A. Towse. 2004. Genetic screening, health care and the insurance industry. European Journal of Health Economics 5: 116–121.Google Scholar
- Paul, Diane.B. 1999. PKU screening: Competing agendas, converging stories. In The practices of human genetics, ed. M. Fortun, and E. Mendelsohn, 185–195. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Quante, Michael. 1997. Ethische Probleme mit dem Konzept der informierten Zustimmung im Kontext humangenetischer Beratung und Diagnostik. In Perspektiven der Humangenetik, ed. F. Petermann, S. Wiedebusch, and M. Quante, 209–227. Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar
- Raz, Joseph. 1986. The morality of freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Sass, H.M. 1996. Copernican challenge of genetic prediction in human medicine. Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 4: 67–79.Google Scholar
- Stone, D.H., and S. Stewart. 1996. Screening and the new genetics; a public health perspective on the ethical debate. Journal of Public Health Medicine 18: 3–5.Google Scholar
- UNESCO (1997) ‘Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights’, available at: http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=13177&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html.
- UNESCO (2003) ‘International Declaration on Human Genetic Data’, available at: http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=17720&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html.
- Wear, Stephen. 1993. Informed consent—patient autonomy and physician beneficence within clinical medicine. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Wilcke, J.T. 1998. Late onset genetic disease: Where ignorance is bliss, is it folly to inform relatives? British Medical Journal 317: 744–747.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization (1997) Proposed international guidelines on ethical issues in medical genetics and genetic services. Available at: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1998/WHO_HGN_GL_ETH_98.1.pdf.