Advertisement

Journal of Plant Biology

, Volume 58, Issue 4, pp 259–269 | Cite as

Comparative transcriptome analyses of drought-resistant and - susceptible Brassica napus L. and development of EST-SSR markers by RNA-Seq

  • Daojie WangEmail author
  • Cuiling Yang
  • Long Dong
  • Jiacheng Zhu
  • Jianping Wang
  • Shufeng ZhangEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Brassica napus is a dicotyledonous plant in the family Brassicaceae. It is an important oil crop which has been widely cultivated over the world. However, drought stress is a very important threatening to B. napus production. In this study, two B. napus strains with different resistance to drought stress were treated with 200 g/L PEG-6000 as drought simulation agent (marked as S, R)and two controls were treated with 1/2 Hoagland medium(marked as ST, RT). With the help of Illumina paired-end RNA-seq technology and de novo assembly by Trinity, we obtained 107,294 Unigenes (integrated four sample results) with an average length of 834 bp and N50 1245. Of these Unigenes, 84,768, 92,545, 54,857, 28,129, 75,278 were assigned to NR, NT, Swiss-Prot, COG and GO database respectively. A total of 46,861 were mapped to 128 pathways by BLAST comparison against the KEGG database. In order to have an overall understanding of the unique genes’ expression difference among four samples, we utilized RPKM to calculate Unigene expression, and to identify differentially expressed genes. Besides, 22,414 SSRs were developed in this study.

Keywords

Brassica napus L. Drought stress RNA-seq Transcriptome analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

12374_2015_113_MOESM1_ESM.docx (300 kb)
Supplementary material, approximately 301 KB.

References

  1. Andersen MN, Heidmann T, Plauborg F. (1996) The effects of drought and nitrogen on light interception, growth and yield of winter oilseed rape. Acta Agr Scand, Sect B, 46:55–67Google Scholar
  2. Audic S, Claverie JM. 1997. The significance of digital gene expression profiles. Genome Res 7:986–995PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chia TYP, Pike MJ, Rawsthorne S. (2005) Storage oil breakdown during embryo development of Brassica napus (L.). J Exp Bot 56:1285–1296.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Conesa A, Götz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J, Talón M, Robles M. (2005) Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 21:3674–3676Google Scholar
  5. Gahlan P, Singh HR, Shankar R, Sharma N, Kumari A, Chawla V, Ahuja PS, Kumar S. (2012) De novo sequencing and characterization of Picrorhiza kurrooa transcriptome at two temperatures showed major transcriptome adjustments. BMC Genomics 13:126PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Garber M, Grabherr MG, Guttman M, Trapnell C. (2011) Computational methods for transcriptome annotation and quantification using RNA-seq. Nat Methods 8:469–477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, Adiconis X, Fan L, Raychowdhury R, Zeng Q, Chen Z, Mauceli E, Hacohen N, Gnirke A, Rhind N, Palma FD, Birren BW, Nusbaum C, Lindblad-Toh K, Friedman N, Regev A. (2011) Full length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol 29:644–652PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hall AE. (1992) Breeding for heat tolerance. Plant Breed Rev 10:129–168Google Scholar
  9. Haseneyer G, Schmutzer T, Seidel M, Zhou R, Mascher M, Schön CC, Taudien S, Scholz U, Stein N, Mayer KFX, Bauer E. (2011) From RNA-seq to large-scale genotyping - genomics resources for rye (Secale cereale L.). BMC Plant Biol 11:131PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Henry JL, McDonald KB. (1978) The effects of soil and fertilizer nitrogen and moisture stress on yield, oil and protein content of rape. Can J Plant Sci 58:303–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Iseli C, Jongeneel CV, Bucher P. (1999) ESTScan: a program for detecting, evaluating, and reconstructing potential coding regions in EST sequences. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol 138–148Google Scholar
  12. Jiang J, Shao Y, Du K, Ran L, Fang X, Wang Y. (2013) Use of digital gene expression to discriminate gene expression differences in early generations of resynthesized Brassica napus and its diploid progenitors. BMC Genomics 14:72PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kanehisa M, Goto S. (2000) KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 28:27–30PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kanehisa M, Araki M, Goto S, Hattori M, Hirakawa M, Itoh M, Katayama T, Kawashima S, Okuda S, Tokimatsu T, Yamanishi Y. (2008) KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment. Nucleic Acids Res 36(Database issue):D480–4Google Scholar
  15. Li P, Ponnala L, Gandotra N, Wang L, Si Y, Tausta SL, Kebrom TH, Provart N, Patel R, Myers CR, Reide EJ, Turgeon R, Liu P, Sun Q, Nelson T, Brutnel TP. (2010) The developmental dynamics of the maize leaf transcriptome. Nat Genet 42:1060–1067PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ma QF, Turner DW, Levy D, Cowling WA. (2004) Solute accumulation and osmotic adjustment in leaves of Brassica oilseeds in response to soil water deficit. Aust J Agric Res 55:939–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ma QSH, Niknam R, Turner DW. (2006) Response of osmotic adjustment and seed yield of Brassica napus and Brassica juncea to soil water deficit at different growth stages. Aust J Agric Res 57:221–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mendham NJ, Salisbury PA. (1995) Physiology, crop development, growth and yield. In: Kimber, D.S. and D.I. McGregor. Brassica Oilseeds: Production and utilization. CAB International, London:11–64Google Scholar
  19. Metzker ML. (2010) Sequencing technologies—the next generation. Nat Rev Genet 11:31–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Morozova O, Hirst M, Marra MA. (2009) Applications of new sequencing technologies for transcriptome analysis. Annu Rev Genomic Hum Genet 10:135–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mortazavi A, Williams BA, McCue K, Schaeffer L, Wold B. (2008) Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNASeq. Nat Methods 5:621–628PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Qiu Q, Ma T, Hu Q, Liu B, Wu Y, Zhou H, Wang Q, Wang J, Liu J. (2011) Genome scale transcriptome analysis of the desert poplar, Populus euphratica. Tree Physiol 31:452–461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rismani-Yazdi H, Haznedaroglu B, Bibby K, Peccia J. (2011) Transcriptome sequencing and annotation of the microalgae Dunaliella tertiolecta: Pathway description and gene discovery for production of next generation biofuels. BMC Genomics 12:14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Robertson MJ, Holland JF. (2004) Production risk of canola in semiarid subtropics of Australia. Aust J Agric Res 55:525–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Robinson M, Oshlack A. (2010) A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome Biol 11:R25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schuster SC. (2008) Next-generation sequencing transforms today’s biology. Nat Methods 5:16–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shi CY, Yang H, Wei CL, Yu O, Zhang ZZ, Jiang CJ, Sun J, Li YY, Chen Q, Xia T, Wan XC. (2011) Deep sequencing of the Camellia sinensis transcriptome revealed candidate genes for major metabolic pathways of tea-specific compounds. BMC Genomics 12:131PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stoker R, Carter KE. (1984) Effect of irrigation and nitrogen on yield and quality of oilseed rape. N Z J Exp Agr 12:219–224Google Scholar
  29. Sun X, Zhou S, Meng F, Liu S. (2012) De novo assembly and characterization of the garlic (Allium sativum) bud transcriptome by Illumina sequencing. Plant Cell Rep 31:1823–1828PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tatusov RL, Galperin MY, Natale DA, Koonin EV. (2000) The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res 28:33–36PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang D, Yang C, Gui Y, Zhang S, Zhu J, Wang J. (2011) Drought resistance and identification method and evaluation index in Brassica napus. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica 20:77–82Google Scholar
  32. Wang L, Cao C, Ma QB, Zeng Q, Wang H, Cheng Z, Zhu G, Qi J, Ma H, Nian H, Wang Y. (2014) RNA-seq analyses of multiple meristems of soybean: novel and alternative transcripts, evolutionary and functional implications. BMC Plant Biol 14:169PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang XW, Luan JB, Li JM, Bao YY, Zhang CX, Liu SS. (2010) De novo characterization of a whitefly transcriptome and analysis of its gene expression during development. BMC Genomics 11:400PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang Z, Li J, Luo Z, Huang L, Chen X, Fang B, Li Y, Chen J, Zhang X. (2011) Characterization and development of EST-derived SSR markers in cultivated sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas). BMC Plant Biol 11:139PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Xu DL, Long H, Liang JJ, Zhang J, Chen X, Li JL, Pan ZF, Deng GB, Yu MQ. (2012) De novo assembly and characterization of the root transcriptome of Aegilops variabilis during an interaction with the cereal cyst nematode. BMC Genomics 13:133PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ye J, Fang L, Zheng H, Zhang Y, Chen J, Zhang Z, Wang J, Li S, Li R, Bolund L, Wang J. (2006) WEGO: a web tool for plotting GO annotations. Nucleic Acids Res 34(Web Server issue):W293–W297Google Scholar
  37. Zeng S, Xiao G, Guo J, Fei Z, Xu Y, Wang Y. (2010) Development of a EST dataset and characterization of EST-SSRs in a traditional Chinese medicinal plant, Epimedium sagittatum (Sieb. Et Zucc.) Maxim. BMC Genomics 11:94PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang J, Liang S, Duan J, Wang J, Chen S, Cheng Z, Zhang Q, Liang X, Li Y. (2012) De novo assembly and characterization of the transcriptome during seed development, and generation of genic-SSR markers in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). BMC Genomics 13:90PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Plant Biologists and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Key Laboratory of Plant Stress Biology, College of Life ScienceHenan UniversityKaifengChina
  2. 2.Institute of Industrial CropsHenan Academy of Agriculture ScienceZhengzhouChina

Personalised recommendations