Advertisement

Geoheritage

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 259–270 | Cite as

Geoconservation, Quarrying and Mining: Opportunities and Challenges Illustrated Through Working in Partnership with the Mineral Extraction Industry in England

  • Colin D. Prosser
Original Article

Abstract

Quarrying and mining have played a fundamental role in the development of society over the last 2 million years. In addition, it generates information and specimens that support the advancement of geoscience and creates exposures that provide a resource for scientific study, education, training and geotourism; a resource that would not otherwise exist. Unsurprisingly, features exposed as a result of current and past quarrying and mining feature heavily within geoconservation inventories of many countries. Mineral extraction can, in some circumstances, damage and destroy elements of geoheritage, especially where it coincides with finite features such as caves or karst, which are irreplaceable if lost. However, the many opportunities for geoconservation that arise from mineral extraction, including creation of new exposure, richer and larger site inventories and protected site series, opportunities to rescue and record material in operating quarries and mines, increased levels of research, education and geotourism and access to funding, largely outweigh the potential threats. Partnership between the mineral extraction industry and geoconservationists is required to realise the opportunities for geoconservation. Experience of partnership working in England at industry, company and site-based level is used to explore how best to deliver geoconservation in quarries and mines at the planning, operating and restoration stages of mineral extraction. Partnership between geoconservationists and the mineral extraction industry, whether it is to seek to avoid impacts on geoheritage or to realise the many opportunities it presents, is deemed essential to the future of geoconservation.

Keywords

Geoconservation Quarrying and mining Mineral extraction Restoration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am indebted to Martin Layer (Planning and Estates Manager, Smiths Bletchington) and Eddie Bailey (Head of Geology and Land Survey, Aggregate Industries) for commenting on and undoubtedly helping to improve this manuscript. Rob Palmer (Regional Geological Manager, Tarmac) helped to scope the presentation given at the 8th International ProGEO Symposium in Reykjavik, Iceland, on which this paper is based, and Dave Evans (Natural England) drafted Figs. 12 and 13. My thanks too go to the two anonymous reviewers and to Lovisa Asbjornsdottir and Kevin Page for editorial help.

References

  1. Bétard F (2013) Patch-scale relationships between geodiversity and biodiversity in hard rock quarries: case study from a disused quartzite quarry in NW France. Geoheritage 5:59–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Black GP (1974) The role of the extractive sites in geological education and research. Proc R Soc Lond 339:389–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown TJ, Hobbs SF, Idoine NE, Mills AJ, Wrighton CE (2016) European mineral statistics 2010–2014—a product of the world mineral statistics database, 361 pp British Geological Survey, Nottingham, UKGoogle Scholar
  4. Countryside and Rights of Way Act (2000) The Stationery Office, UKGoogle Scholar
  5. de Lima FF, Brilha JB, Salamuni E (2010) Inventorying geological heritage in large territories: a methodical proposal applied to Brasil. Geoheritage 2:91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davies AM (2006) Nature after minerals: how mineral site restoration can benefit people and wildlife. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, SandyGoogle Scholar
  7. Ellis N (2011) The geological conservation review (GCR) in Great Britain—rationale and methods. Proc Geol Assoc 122:353–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ellis NV, Bowen DQ, Campbell S, Knill JL, McKirdy AP, Prosser CD, Vincent MA, Wilson RCL (1996) An introduction to the GCR. GCR Series No. 1. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, PeterboroughGoogle Scholar
  9. English Geodiversity Forum (2015) Geodiversity charter for England, 24 pp see www.englishgeodiversityforum.org
  10. English Nature, Quarry Products Association, Silica and Moulding Sands Association (1999) Biodiversity and minerals: extracting the benefits for wildlife. Entec UK Ltd, 13 ppGoogle Scholar
  11. English Nature, Quarry Products Association, Silica and Moulding Sands Association (2003) Geodiversity and the minerals industry—conserving our geological heritage. Entec UK Ltd, 17 ppGoogle Scholar
  12. Evans D (2010–2011) Trackways partnership triumph. Earth Heritage 35:12–13Google Scholar
  13. Gatley S, Parkes, M (2008) Geological heritage guidelines for the extractive industry. Irish Concrete Federation and Geological Survey of Ireland, 20 ppGoogle Scholar
  14. Haarhoff P, Prosser C (2006-2007) South Africa sets example for fossil tourism. Earth Heritage 27:22–23Google Scholar
  15. Lamolda MA, Paul CRC, Peryt D, Pons, JM (2014) The Global Boundary Stratotype and Section Point (GSSP) for the base of the Santonian Stage, “Cantera de Margas”, Olazagutia, northern Spain. Episodes 37:2–13Google Scholar
  16. Lawrence DJD, Vye CL, Young B (2004) Durham geodiversity audit. Durham County Council, Durham 185 ppGoogle Scholar
  17. López-García JA, Oyarzun R, López Andrés S, Manteca Martínez JI (2011) Scientific, educational and environmental considerations regarding mine sites and geoheritage: a perspective from SE Spain. Geoheritage 3:267–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. National Planning Policy Framework (2012) Department for Communities and Local Government, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  19. Pereira DI, Pereira P, Brilha J, Cunha PP (2013) The Iberian Massif Landscape and Fluvial Network in Portugal: a geoheritage inventory based on the scientific value. Proc Geol Assoc 126(2015):252–265Google Scholar
  20. Prosser CD (1992) Active quarrying and conservation. Earth Sci Conserv 31:22–24Google Scholar
  21. Prosser CD (2003) Geology and quarries: some new opportunities. Geol Today 19:65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Prosser CD, Murphy M, Larwood J (2006) Geological conservation: a guide to good practice. English Nature, Peterborough 145ppGoogle Scholar
  23. Reynard E, Coratza P (2013) Scientific research on geomorphosites. A review of the activities of the IAG Working Group on Geomorphosites over the last twelve years. Geografia Fisica i Dinamica Quaternaria 36(2013):159–168Google Scholar
  24. Scottish Geodiversity Forum (2013) Scotland’s geodiversity charter, 16 pp, see www.scottishgeodiversityforum.org
  25. Tiess G, Ruban DA (2013) Geological heritage and mining legislation: a brief conceptual assessment of the principal legal acts of selected EU countries. Proc Geol Assoc 124:411–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Thompson A, Poole J, Carroll L, Foweraker M, Harris K, Cox P (2006) Geodiversity action plans for aggregate companies: a guide to good practice. Report to the mineral industry research organisation. Published by Capita Symonds Ltd, East GrinsteadGoogle Scholar
  27. White GJ, Gilbert JC (eds) (2003) Habitat creation handbook for the minerals industry. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, SandyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The European Association for Conservation of the Geological Heritage 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Natural EnglandPeterboroughUK

Personalised recommendations