, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 381–391 | Cite as

The Paleontological Heritage of the Acre (Amazonia, Brazil): Contribution Towards a National Paleontological Database

  • Nei Ahrens Haag
  • Maria Helena Henriques
Original Article


Acre State is located in the southwest of Amazonia (Brazil) and is internationally known for its fossiliferous sites which have yielded well-preserved fossils of major relevance to the understanding of the Cenozoic paleofauna of South America, mainly during the Miocene. In order to preserve this paleontological heritage and to study the material from the formations outcropping across south western Amazonia, the Paleontological Research Laboratory was created in the 1980s at the Federal University of Acre (acronym UFAC in Portuguese) and houses a collection including over 4500 catalogued specimens (mainly invertebrates, fish, reptiles, birds and mammals) and a small Museum open to the scientific community and to a wider society. This paper aims to identify the geoheritage value of the fossil record of Acre, which is represented by material collected from the Solimões Formation (Miocene to Pliocene) over the last three decades and stored at the UFAC. The qualitative evaluation system used, which integrates both its scientific and social uses, can also be applied to other Brazilian collections, in order to create a National Paleontological Database, similar to that already developed for Geological and Paleobiological Sites.


Paleontological heritage Amazonia Acre Solimões formation Brazil 



This work has been supported by the project 01200.001631/2010-32—Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, Brazil (“Biochronostratigraphy and paleoecology based on the fossiliferous potential of the Cretaceous - Neogene of the Acre Basin, Juruá Valley, of the southwest Amazonia”), by a CAPES grant (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior/Higher Level Personnel Training Coordination programme), by FEDER funds through the Competitiveness Factors Operational Programme - COMPETE and national funds by FCT in the frame of the UID/Multi00073/2013 project. The authors are grateful to Gabriel Barberes, Sílvia Silva and Jorge Carvalho for helpful collaboration with the graphical information and to two anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions.


  1. Aguilera OA, Bocquentin J, Lundberg JG, Maciente A (2008) A new cajaro catfish (siluriformes: pimelodidae: †phractocephalus) from the late Miocene of southwestern Amazonia and its relationship to †Phractocephalus nassi of the Urumaco formation. Paläontol Z 82(2):230–244. doi: 10.1007/BF02988412 Google Scholar
  2. Alvarenga HMF, Guilherme E (2003) The anhingas (Aves: anhingidae) from the upper tertiary (Miocene-Pliocene) of southwestern Amazonia. Journal Vertebrate Paleontology 23:614–621. doi: 10.1671/1890 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbosa Rodrigues J (1892) Les reptiles fossiles de la vallée de l’amazone. Vellosia, Contribuciones del Museo Botánico de Amazonas 2:41–60Google Scholar
  4. Barbosa VP, Benchimol RE (1993) Ocorrência de lepidosiren (dipnoi, lepidosirenidae) na formação solimões. Cenozoico da Bacia do Acre XIII Congresso Brasileiro de Paleontologia e I Simpósio Paleontológico do Cone Sul Boletim de Resumos: 129Google Scholar
  5. Bocquentin JV, Souza-Filho JP, Negri FR (1990) Neoepiblema acreensis, sp. nov. (Mammalia, rodentia) do neógeno do acre, Brasil. Boletim do Museu Paranaense Emílio Goeldi 2:65–72Google Scholar
  6. Bocquentin JV, Guilherme E (1999) As preguiças mylodontinae (Mammalia, xenarthra, mylodontidae) do neógeno do sítio niterói, acre, brasil. Acta Geolológica Leopoldensia 22(48):57–67Google Scholar
  7. Bocquentin JV, Melo J (2006) Stupendemys souzai sp. nov. (pleurodira, podocnemididae) from the Miocene-Pliocene of the solimões formation, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Paleontologia 9(2):187–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bocquentin JV, Silva W (1994) Cf. Gyrinodon sp. (notoungulata. Toxodontidae) proveniente do mioceno superior da localidade de cavalcante, acre, brasil. Acta Geológica Leopoldensia 39(17):391–398Google Scholar
  9. Bocquentin JV, Santos JCR (1989) Ocorrência de chelus colombianus (chelonii, chelidae) no mioceno superior do acre, Brasil. XI Congresso Brasileiro de Paleontologia 1:439–446Google Scholar
  10. Bocquentin JV, Souza-Filho JP (1989) Nova interpretação do gênero purussaurus (crocodylia, alligatoridae). XI Congresso Brasileiro de Paleontologia 427–438Google Scholar
  11. Bocquentin JV, Souza-Filho JP (1990) O crocodiliano sul-americano carandaisuchus Como sinonímia de mourasuchus (nettosuchidae). Revista Brasileira de Geociências 20:230–233Google Scholar
  12. Bocquentin JV, Guilherme E, Negri FR (2001) Duas espécies do gênero chelus (pleurodira, chelidae) no mioceno superior-plioceno inferior da Amazônia Sul-ocidental. Revista Universidade Guarulhos 6(6):50–55Google Scholar
  13. Bocquentin JV, Souza-Filho JP, Barbosa-Rodrigues A, Silva G (1996) A coleção de vertebrados fósseis do laboratório de paleontologia da universidade federal do acre, brasil. In: Latrubesse, EM Paleo e Neoclimas da Amazônia Sul-Ocidental/Southern Amazônia Paleo and Neoclimates (Conferência de Campo), UFAC/Laboratório de Geomorfologia e Sedimentologia, Rio Branco, pp 76–89Google Scholar
  14. Bottjer DJ, Etter W, Hagadorn JW, Tang CM (2002) Fossil lagerstätten: jewels of the fossil record. In: Bottjer DJ (ed) Exceptional fossil preservation: a unique view on the evolution of marine life. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 1–10Google Scholar
  15. Brilha J (2015) Inventory and quantitative assessment of geosites and geodiversity sites: a review. Geoheritage. doi: 10.1007/s12371-014-0139-3 Google Scholar
  16. Broin F, Bocquentin J, Negri FR (1993) Gigantic turtles (pleurodira, podocnemididae) from the late Miocene-early Pliocene of South Western Amazon. Bulletin de l’Institut Français d’Études Andines 22(3):657–670Google Scholar
  17. Campos DA (1977) Tartarugas fósseis do brasil. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, DissertationGoogle Scholar
  18. Campos DA, Broin F (1981) Tartarugas fósseis do Brasil. An Acad Bras Cienc 53(1):210–211Google Scholar
  19. Carmo DA, Carvalho IS, Santucci RM, Silva MA (2010) Jazigos fossilíferos do Brasil: legislação e cooperação científica internacional. In: Carvalho IS (ed) Paleontologia: conceitos e métodos. Editora Interciência Ltda, Rio de Janeiro, pp. 561–584Google Scholar
  20. Carvalho P, Bocquentin J, Broin FL (2002) Une nouvelle espèce de podocnemis (pleurodira, podocnemididae) provenant du néogène de la formação solimões, acre, brésil. Geobios 35:677–686. doi: 10.1016/S0016-6995(02)00081-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cavalcante LM (2006) Aspectos geológicos do estado do Acre e implicações na evolução da paisagem. Embrapa Documentos 104, Rio Branco, 25pGoogle Scholar
  22. Cozzuol MA, Goin F, Reyes M, Ranzi A (2006) The oldest species of didelphis (Mammalia, marsupialia, didelphidae), from the late Miocene of Amazonia. J Mammal 87(4):663–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eiras JF, Becker CR, Souza EM, Gonzaga FG, Silva JGF, Daniel LMF, Matsuda NS, Feijó FJ (1994) Bacia do solimões. Boletim de Geociências da PETROBRAS, Rio de Janeiro 8(1):17–45Google Scholar
  24. Endere ML, Prado JL (2014) Characterization and valuation of paleontological heritage: a perspective from Argentina. Geoheritage. doi: 10.1007/s12371-014-0124-x Google Scholar
  25. Feijó FJ, Souza RG (1994) Bacia do acre. Boletim de Geociências da PETROBRAS, Rio de Janeiro 8(1):9–16Google Scholar
  26. Frailey CD, Lavina E, Rancy A, Souza-Filho JP (1988) A proposed Pleistocene/Holocene lake in the Amazon Basin and its significance to Amazonian geology and biogeography. Acta Amazon 18:119–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gaffney ES, Campbel K, Wood RC (1998) Pelomedusoid side-necked turtles from late Miocene sediments in southwestern Amazonia. Am Mus Novit 3245:1–12Google Scholar
  28. Gasparini Z (1985) Un Nuevo cocodrilo (eusuchia) cenozóico de américa del Sur. In: brasil, MME-DNPM. Colet Trab Paleontologia 27(2):51–53Google Scholar
  29. Gayet M, Jégu M, Bocquentin J, Negri FR (2003) New characoids from the upper Cretaceous and Paleocene of Bolivia and the Mio-Pliocene of Brazil: phylogenetic position and palaeobiogeographic implications. J Vertebr Paleontol 23(1):28–46. doi: 10.1671/0272-4634 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gingras MK, Räsänen M, Ranzi A (2002) The significance of bioturbated inclined heterolithic stratification in the southern part of the Miocene Solimoes formation, Rio Acre, Amazonia Brazil. Palaios 17(6):591–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Henriques MH, Pena dos Reis R (2015) Framing the palaeontological heritage within the geological heritage: an integrative vision. Geoheritage. doi: 10.1007/s12371-014-0141-9 Google Scholar
  32. Henriques MH, Pena dos Reis R, Brilha J, Mota T (2011) Geoconservation as an emerging geoscience. Geoheritage 3:117–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hoorn C (1993) Miocene incursions and the influence of Andean tectonics on the Miocene deposicional history of northwestern Amazonia: results of a palynostratigraphic study. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 105:267–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hoorn C, Wesselingh FP, Hovikoski J, Guerrero J (2010) The development of the Amazonian mega-wetland (Miocene; Brazil, Colombia, Peru, Bolivia). In: Hoorn C, Wesselingh FP (eds) Amazonia: landscape and species evolution: a look into the past. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, pp. 123–142Google Scholar
  35. Hovikoski J, Räsänen M, Gingras M, Ranzi A, Melo J (2008) Tidal and seasonal controls in the formation of late Miocene inclined heterolithic stratification deposits, western Amazonian foreland basin. Sedimentology 55(3):499–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hsiou AS, Ferigolo J, Albino A (2010) Sobre os squamata (lepidosauria) da formação solimões, mioceno da Amazônia Sul-ocidental, brasil. XXIII Jornadas Argentinas de Paleontologia de Vertebrados, Libro de Resúmenes: 18Google Scholar
  37. IBGE (2015) Mapa Geológico do Acre. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Accessed 7 April 2015
  38. ICZN (2015) About the ICZN. International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. Accessed 1 April 2015
  39. Kay RF, Cozzuol MA (2006) New platyrrhine monkeys from the Solimões formation (late Miocene, Acre State, Brazil). J Hum Evol 50:673–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kronberg BI, Fralick PW, Benchimol RE (1998) Late quaternary sedimentation and palaeohidrology in the Acre foreland basin, SW Amazonia. Basin Res 10:311–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Latrubesse EM, Bocquentin J, Santos CR, Ramonell CG (1997) Paleoenvironmental model for the late Cenozoic southwestern Amazonia: paleontology and geology. Acta Amazon 27(2):103–118Google Scholar
  42. Maury CJ (1937) Argilas fossilíferas do plioceno do território do acre. Boletim do Serviço Geológico e Mineralógico do Brasil 77:1–29Google Scholar
  43. Matti ER, Linna AM, Santos JCR, Negri FR (1995) Late Miocene tidal deposits in the Amazonian foreland basin. Science 269:386–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McMillan AA (2008) The role of the British Geological Survey in the history of geoconservation. In: Burek CV, Prosser CD (eds) The history of geoconservation. Geological Society, Special Publications 300, London, pp. pp 103–pp 112Google Scholar
  45. Monsh KA (1998) Miocene fish faunas from de northwestern Amazonia Basin (Colombia, Peru, Brazil) with evidence of marine incursions. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 143:31–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Miura K (1972) Possibilidades petrolíferas da bacia do acre. XXVI Congresso Brasileiro de Geologia, Anais de Resumo, pp. 15–20Google Scholar
  47. Mones A (1986) Acremylodon a new name for stenodon frailey, 1986 (Mammalia: edentata: mylodontidae). Comunicaciones Paleontológicas del Museo de Historia Natural de Montevideo 16:228Google Scholar
  48. Mones A, Toledo PM (1989) Primer hallazgo de euphilus ameghino, 1889 (Mammalia: rodentia: neoepiblemidae) en el neogeno del Estado de acre, brasil. Comunicaciones Paleontologicas del Museo de Historia Natural de Montevideo 21(2):1–15Google Scholar
  49. Negri FR, Ferigolo J (1999) Anatomia craniana de neoepiblema ambrosettianus (ameghino, 1889) (rodentia: caviomorpha: neoepiblemidae) do mioceno superior-plioceno do Estado do acre, brasil, e revisão das espécies do gênero. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi 10:1–80Google Scholar
  50. Negri FR (2004) Os tardigrada (Mammalia, xenarthra) do neógeno, Amazônia Sul-ocidental, brasil. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, DissertationGoogle Scholar
  51. Negri FR, Bocquentin-Villanueva J, Ferigolo J, Antoine PO (2010) The development of the Amazonian mega-wetland (Miocene; Brazil, Colombia, Peru, Bolivia). In: Hoorn C, Wesselingh FP (eds) Amazonia: landscape and species evolution: a look into the past. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, pp. 245–258Google Scholar
  52. Page K (2003) The protection of Jurassic sites and fossils: challenges for global Jurassic science (including a proposed statement on the conservation of palaeontological heritage and stratotypes). Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia i Stratigrafia 110(1):373–379Google Scholar
  53. Paula-Couto C (1978) Fossil mammals from the of Acre, Brazil. 2: Rodentia, Caviomorpha, Dinomyidae. Iheringia. Série Geologia 5:3–17Google Scholar
  54. Paula-Couto C (1944) Notícia preliminar sobre um novo toxodonte do cenozoico do território do acre. Abothrodon pricei. n.g., n.sp. Boletim do Museu Nacional, Geologia 3:1–4Google Scholar
  55. Paula-Couto C (1970) Evolução de comunidades, modificações faunísticas e integrações biocenóticas dos vertebrados cenozoicos do brasil. Actas IV Congresso Latino Americano de Zoologia 2:907–930Google Scholar
  56. Paula-Couto C (1976) Fossil Mammals from the Cenozoic of Acre, Brazil. 1: Astrapotheria. Anais XXVIII Congresso Brasileiro de Geologia 237–249Google Scholar
  57. Paula-Couto C (1981) Fossil mammals from the Cenozoic of Acre, Brazil, IV. Notoungulata notohippidae and toxodontidae nesodontinae. Anais II Congresso Latino-Americano de Paleontologia 2(1):461–477Google Scholar
  58. Paula-Couto C (1982) Fossil mammals from the Cenozoic of Acre, Brazil V—notoungulata nesodontinae (II), toxodontinae and haplodontheriinae and litopterna, pyrotheria and astrapotheria (II). Iheringia 7:5–43Google Scholar
  59. Paula-Couto C (1983) Fossil mammals from the cenozoic of acre, Brazil VI—edentata cingulata. Iheringia 8:33–49Google Scholar
  60. Pena dos Reis R, Henriques MH (2009) Approaching an integrated qualification and evaluation system of the geological heritage. Geoheritage 1(1):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Piranha JM, Lama EA, Bacci DC (2011) Geoparks in Brazil—strategy of geoconservation and development. Geoheritage 3:289–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Price LI (1964) Sobre o crânio de um Grande crocodilideo extinto do alto Rio juruá, Estado do acre. An Acad Bras Cienc 36:59–66Google Scholar
  63. Radambrasil (1976) Levantamento de recursos naturais (geologia, geomorfologia, pedologia, vegetação e uso potencial da terra). DNPM 12: Fl. SC 19 Rio Branco, Rio de Janeiro, 458pGoogle Scholar
  64. Ruban DA (2015) Geotourism—a geographical review of the literature. Tourism Management Perspectives 15:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schemm-Gregory M, Henriques MH (2013) The Devonian brachiopod collections of Portugal—a paleontological heritage. Geoheritage 5(2):107–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schobbenhaus C, Campos DA, Queiroz ET, Winge M, Berbert-Born ML (2002) (ed) sítios geológicos e paleontológicos do brasil. DNPM/CPRM/SIGEP, Brasíla, 540pGoogle Scholar
  67. SIGEP (2015) Brazilian commission of geological and palaeobiological sites. Accessed 1 April 2015
  68. Sookias RB, Budd GE, Kear BP (2013) Mesozoic fossil sustainability: synoptic case studies of resource management. GFF 135(1):131–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Souza-Filho JP (1998) Novas formas fósseis de crocodylia (alligatoridae e gavialidae) da formação solimões, cenozoico do Estado do acre-brasil, representadas por materiais cranianos e mandibulares. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, DissertationGoogle Scholar
  70. Souza-Filho JP, Bocquentin J (1991) Caiman niteroiensis sp. nov. (Alligatoridae, Crocodylia) do Neógeno do Estado do Acre, Brasil. XII Congresso Brasileiro de Paleontologia, Boletim de Resumos: 126Google Scholar
  71. UNDB (2015) Strategic goals & targets for 2020. Taking action for biodiversity. United Nations Decade for Biodiversity. Accessed 2 April 2015
  72. Webb SD (1995) Biological implications of the middle Miocene amazon seaway. Science 269:361–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wesselingh FP, Hoorn MC, Guerrero J, Räsänen ME, Romero Pittmann L, Salo J (2006) The stratigraphy and regional structure of Miocene deposits in western Amazonia (Peru, Colombia and Brazil), with implications for late Neogene landscape evolution. Scr Geol 133:291–322Google Scholar
  74. Westaway R (2006) Late Cenozoic sedimentary sequences in Acre state, southwestern Amazonia: fluvial or tidal? Deductions from the IGCP 449 fieldtrip. J S Am Earth Sci 21:120–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Winge M, Schobbenhaus C, Souza CRG, Fernandes ACS, Queiroz ET, Berbert-Born M, Campos DA (eds) (2009) Sítios geológicos e paleontológicos do brasil. CPRM, Brasília, 515pGoogle Scholar
  76. Winge M, Schobbenhaus C, Souza CRG, Fernandes ACS, Berbert-Born M, Salun Filho W, Queiroz ET (eds) (2013) Sítios geológicos e paleontológicos do brasil. CPRM, Brasília, 330pGoogle Scholar
  77. WWF (2015) Tropical Forests. Magical Rainforests. World Wide Fund For Nature. Accessed 13 July 2015

Copyright information

© The European Association for Conservation of the Geological Heritage 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geosciences Centre of the University of Coimbra and Multidisciplinary Centre of the Federal University of AcreCruzeiro do SulBrazil
  2. 2.Geosciences Centre of the University of Coimbra and Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Sciences and TechnologyUniversity of Coimbra (Polo II)CoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations