, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 5–14 | Cite as

Geosite and Geomorphosite Assessment as a Tool for Geoconservation and Geotourism Purposes: a Case Study from Vizovická vrchovina Highland (Eastern Part of the Czech Republic)

Original Article


The geoheritage of the Czech Republic presents a basis for geoconservation and geotourism activities which have a long tradition in the region. Sites of geological and geomorphological interest have been appreciated for a long time, and from the nineteenth century, some have been declared as protected. The first official list of protected sites was created during the 1930s, and in 1956, the first law on nature conservation was approved. Today, nature conservation is covered by the Act 114/1992 Coll. that enables landscapes, karst features, minerals, and fossils to be protected as well as the establishment of protected areas. In addition, there are many other geoconservation assessments, e.g., the database of the geological sites or the network of the national geoparks. In the National Parks, Protected Landscape Areas or geoparks, the promotion of geosites and geomorphosites is well developed. However, outside these areas, the promotion and use of sites for geotourism purposes is relatively poor, although it is obvious that they can represent a source for geotourism activities that can foster local economic development. For finding out which sites are suitable for geotourism development, a simple method was proposed and the selected sites of the Vizovická vrchovina Highland (Czech Republic) were assessed. Based on this, strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats were identified. The assessment and the following analysis of the area can serve as a basis for the future proposals for geotourist use of the sites.


Geotourism Geoconservation Geosite and geomorphosite assessment Vizovická vrchovina Highland SWOT analysis 



The research was supported by long-term conceptual development support of research organisation (Institute of Geonics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v.v.i.) RVO: 68145535.


  1. Baroň I, Řehák Z (1997) K problematice zimování vrápence malého (Rhinolophus hipposideros) na Vsetínsku. Zpravodaj OVM Vsetín, pp 3-12Google Scholar
  2. Baroň I et al (2014) Application of infrared thermography for mapping open fractures in deep-seated rockslides and unstable cliffs. Landslides 11:15–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Budil P et al (2012) Czech Republic. In: Wimbledon WAP, Smith-Meyer S (eds) Geoheritage in Europe and its conservation. Pro GEO, Oslo, pp 92–99Google Scholar
  4. Čeřovský J (2004) Vývoj hnutí dobrovolných konzervátorů, zpravodajů a strážců přírody na území České republiky. Veronica spec. issue (16):22–26Google Scholar
  5. Cílek V (2010) Saxon-Bohemian Switzerland: sandstone rock cities and fascination in a romantic landscape. In: Migon P (ed) Geomorphological landscapes of the world. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 201–209Google Scholar
  6. Coratza P, Giusti C (2005) Methodological proposal for the assessment of the scientific quality of geomorphosites. Il Quaternario Ital J Quat Sci 18(1):305–313Google Scholar
  7. Demek J, Mackovčin P (eds) (2006) Zeměpisný lexikon ČR: Hory a nížiny. Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic, 582 pGoogle Scholar
  8. Dowling R (2013) Global geotourism—an emerging form of sustainable tourism. Czech J Tour 2(2):59–79Google Scholar
  9. Dowling R, Newsome D (eds) (2010) Geotourism. The tourism of geology and landscape. Goodfellow Publishers Ltd., 246 pGoogle Scholar
  10. Gray M (2013) Geodiversity: valuing and conserving abiotic nature, 2nd edn. Wiley Blackwell, 495 pGoogle Scholar
  11. Hose TA (2012) 3G’s for modern geotourism. Geoheritage 4(1–2):7–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kamarád L (1975) Chráněná území a ochrana reliefu krajiny 1945-1975. Ochrana Přír 5–6:157–167Google Scholar
  13. Kirchner K (2004) On distribution of slope deformations in the north-eastern part of the Vizovická vrchovina Highland in Eastern Moravia. Acta Univ Carol Geol XXXIX(1):5–18Google Scholar
  14. Kirchner K, Kubalíková L (2014) Geosite and geomorphosite assessment for geotourism purposes: a case study from the Vizovická vrchovina Highland, Eastern Moravia. In: Fialova J, Pernicova D (eds) Public recreation and landscape protection—with man hand in hand: conference proceedings. pp 121-128Google Scholar
  15. Krejčí O et al (1997) Geological map of the Czech Republic 1:50 000, sheet 25-41 Vsetín. Czech Institute of Geology, PragueGoogle Scholar
  16. Kubalíková L (2013) Geomorphosite assessment for geotourism purposes. Czech J Tour 2(2):80–104Google Scholar
  17. Kubalíková L, Kirchner K (2013) Relief assessment methodology with respect to geoheritage based on example of the Deblinska vrchovina highland. In: Fialova J, Kubickova H (eds) Public recreation and landscape protection—with man hand in hand: conference proceedings. pp 131-141Google Scholar
  18. Martini G et al (2012) Reflections about the geotourism concept. In: Sá AA, Rocha D, Paz A, Correia V (eds) Proceedings of the 11 European Geoparks Conference. AGA – Associação Geoparque Arouca, Arouca, pp 187–188Google Scholar
  19. Migoń P (2009) Geomorphosites and the world heritage list of UNESCO. In: Reynard E, Coratza P, Regolini-Bissig G (eds) Geomorphosites. Pfeil, Munchen, pp 119–130Google Scholar
  20. National Geographic Society (2005) Geotourism charter. Retrieved 13th October 2012 from: <>
  21. Panizza M (2001) Geomorphosites: concepts, methods and example of geomorphological survey. Chin Sci Bull 46:4–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Panizza M, Piacente S (2008) Geomorphosites and geotourism. Rev Geogr Acad 2(1):5–9Google Scholar
  23. Pásková M (2012) Environmentalistika cestovního ruchu. Czech J Tour 1(2):77–119Google Scholar
  24. Pereira P, Pereira D (2010) Methodological guidelines for geomorphosite assessment. Géomorphol Relief Process Environ 1(3):215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pešout P (2013) Silvestrovský výnos – 80 let od vydání. Ochrana Přír 6:8–11Google Scholar
  26. Pralong JP (2003) Valorisation et vulgarisation des sciences de la Terre: les concepts de temps et d’espace. In: Reynard E, Holzmann C, Guex D, Summermatter N (eds) Géomorphologie et tourisme, Actes de la Réunion annuelle de la Société Suisse de Géomorphologie (SSGm), pp 115-127Google Scholar
  27. Pralong JP (2005) A method for assessing tourist potential and use of geomorphological sites. Géomorphol Relief Process Environ 1(3):189–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pralong JP, Reynard E (2005) A proposal for a classification of geomorphological sites depending on their tourist value. Il Quaternario Ital J Quat Sci 18(1):315–321Google Scholar
  29. Reynard E (2008) Scientific research and tourist promotion of geomorphological heritage. Geogr Fis Dinam Quat 31:225–230Google Scholar
  30. Reynard E et al (2003) Géomorphologie et tourisme: quelles relations? In: Reynard E, Holzmann C, Guex D, Summermatter N (eds) Géomorphologie et tourisme, Actes de la Réunion annuelle de la Société Suisse de Géomorphologie (SSGm). pp 1-10Google Scholar
  31. Reynard E et al (2007) A method for assessing the scientific and additional values of geomorphosites. Geogr Helv 62(3):148–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Serrano E, González Trueba JJ (2005) Assessment of geomorphosites in natural protected areas; the Picos de Europa National Park (Spain). Géomorphol Relief Process Environ 1(3):197–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Veselý J et al (1954) Ochrana československé přírody a krajiny. Díl I. Nakladatelství ČSAV, Praha, 356 pGoogle Scholar
  34. Vítek J (2012) Význačné geologické útvary jako předmět zájmu ochrany přírody. In: Machar I, Drobilová L (eds) Ochrana přírody a krajiny v České republice – vybrané aktuální problémy a možnosti jejich řešení (the appendix). Univerzita Palackého Olomouc, pp 23-28Google Scholar
  35. Vrška T, Hort L (2008) Historie vzniku lesních rezervací v ČR do r. 1945. Ochrana přírody 63 (1). Retrieved 29th May 2014 from:

  1. Act No. 40/1956 Collection of Laws of the Czechoslovac RepublicGoogle Scholar
  2. Act No. 114/1992 Collection of Laws of the Czech RepublicGoogle Scholar
  3. The Charter of National Geoparks (
  4. The Database of Geological Localities (
  5. The Database of Speleological Objects (
  6. The Directive of the Ministry of Environment No. 07/2006 (updated in 2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The European Association for Conservation of the Geological Heritage 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of GeonicsAcademy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v.v.i. Branch BrnoBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations