Advertisement

Geoheritage

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 249–259 | Cite as

Framing the Palaeontological Heritage Within the Geological Heritage: An Integrative Vision

Review Article

Abstract

Fossils represent an important component of the Earth’s diversity and therefore possess heritage value. Like other components of the geodiversity of planet Earth, the palaeontological heritage should require geoconservationist measures under a protective point of view. A qualitative system for evaluating the palaeontological heritage is proposed, based on the content displayed by fossils (indicial, iconographic, documental, scenic, symbolic and conceptual), which is applicable to the whole fossil record whether in situ or elsewhere. By integrating specimen-based with site-based approaches, this open evaluation system can also overcome the difficulties involved in assessing geological objects other than fossils, which are currently housed in museums, such as rocks and minerals; they are also part of the geological heritage of the Earth but are usually not included in site-based geoconservation thinking. Nature conservation can only be promoted if geoconservation plays the same role as biological conservation in nature management and all natural processes are considered together. The close relationship between the palaeontological heritage—as a reflection of past biodiversity on Earth—and the biological heritage that supports its present biodiversity can help integrate geoconservation and biological conservation perspectives and actions, thus representing an important tool for fostering more holistic approaches to nature conservation.

Keywords

Geological heritage Applied geoconservation Palaeontological heritage Fossil record Qualitative evaluation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Dr. Colin Prosser for helpful comments and suggestions. They acknowledge two anonymous reviewers for the careful revision of the manuscript.

References

  1. ABT (2014) Aichi biodiversity targets. Convention on biological diversity. Online: http://www.cbd.int/sp/targets/#GoalA. Accessed 3 Jul 2014
  2. Alroy J (coord) (2014) Fossilworks. Gateway to the paleobiology database. http://paleodb.org/cgi-bin/bridge.pl. Accessed 31 Mar 2014
  3. Arias C (2006) Aportaciones de los fósiles al cambio climático. In: Calonge A, Gonzalo R, López Carrillo MD, Márquez B, Pardo Alonso MV (eds) XX Jornadas de la Sociedad Española de Paleontología 2004, Actas, Alcalá de Henares, pp 11–22Google Scholar
  4. Bottjer DJ, Etter W, Hagadorn JW, Tang CM (2002) Fossil Lagerstätten: jewels of the fossil record. In: Bottjer DJ (ed) Exceptional fossil preservation: a unique view on the evolution of marine life. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  5. Brilha J (2002) Geoconservation and protected areas. Environ Conserv 29(3):273–276Google Scholar
  6. Brocx M, Semeniuk V (2007) Geoheritage and geoconservation. History, definition, scope and scale. J R Soc West Aust 90:53–87Google Scholar
  7. Bruno DE, Crowley BE, Gutak JM, Moroni A, Nazarenko OV, Oheim KB, Ruban DA, Tiess G, Zorina SO (2014) Paleogeography as geological heritage: developing geosite classification. Earth Sci Rev 138:300–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buhay DN, Best LA (2014) Informal learning at Stonehammer and English Riviera geoparks. Geoheritage. doi: 10.1007/s12371-014-0125-9 Google Scholar
  9. Burek CV, Prosser CD (2008) The history of geoconservation. An introduction. In: Burek CV, Prosser CD (eds) The history of geoconservation. Geological Society, Special Publications 300, London, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  10. CBD (1993) The Convention. Article 2. Use of terms. Convention on Biological Diversity. http://www.cbd.int/convention/articles/default.shtml?a=cbd-02. Accessed 31 Mar 2014
  11. Clary RM, Wandersee JH (2014) Lessons from US fossil parks for effective informal science education. Geoheritage. doi: 10.1007/s12371-014-0116-x Google Scholar
  12. Demnard F, Neraudeau D (2001) L'utilisation des oursins fossils de la Préhistoire à l’époque gallo-romaine. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 98(4):693–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Renzi M (2001) Has Palaeontology answers for some current environmental problems? In: Castillo Ruiz C, Martín González E, Martínez Chacón ML (eds) Jornadas de Paleontología. Paleontología y Medioambiente, 1988, Tenerife, Revista Española de Paleontología, Madrid, n° extraordinario, pp 5–14Google Scholar
  14. Dinis JL, Oliveira FP, Rey J, Duarte IL (2010) Finding geological heritage: legal issues on private property and fieldwork. The case of outstanding early angiosperms (Barremian to Albian, Portugal). Geoheritage 2:77–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doughty P (2008) How things began: the origins of geological conservation. In: Burek CV, Prosser CD (eds) The history of geoconservation. Geological Society, Special Publications 300, London, pp 7–16Google Scholar
  16. Endere ML, Prado JL (2014) Characterization and valuation of paleontological heritage: a perspective from Argentina. Geoheritage. doi: 10.1007/s12371-014-0124-x Google Scholar
  17. Enniouar A, Lagnaoui A, Habib A (2014) A Middle Jurassic sauropod tracksite in the Argana Basin, Western High Atlas, Morocco: an example of paleoichnological heritage for sustainable geotourism. Proc Geol Assoc 125(1):114–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Erikstad L (2008) History of geoconservation in Europe. In: Burek CV, Prosser CD (eds) The history of geoconservation. Geological Society, Special Publications 300, London, pp 249–256Google Scholar
  19. Fermeli G, Meléndez Hevia G, Koutsouveli A, Dermitzakis M, Calonge A, Steininger F, D’Arpa C, Di Patti C (2013) Geoscience teaching and student interest in secondary schools-preliminary results from an interest research in Greece, Spain and Italy. Geoheritage. doi: 10.1007/s12371-013-0094-4 Google Scholar
  20. Francis RA, Goodman M (2010) Post-normal science and the art of nature conservation. J Nat Conserv 18:89–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gray M (2008) Geodiversity: the origin and evolution of a paradigm. In: Burek CV, Prosser CD (eds) The history of geoconservation. Geological Society, Special Publications 300, London, pp 31–36Google Scholar
  22. Gray M (2012) Valuing geodiversity in an ‘ecosystem services’ context. Scott Geogr J 128(3–4):177–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gray M, Gordon JE, Brown EJ (2013) Geodiversity and the ecosystem approach: the contribution of geoscience in delivering integrated environmental management. Proc Geol Assoc 124(4):659–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gutiérrez-Marco JC, Sá AA, García-Bellido DC, Rábano I, Valerio M (2009) Giant trilobites and trilobite clusters from the Ordovician of Portugal. Geology 37(5):443–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hansom J (2012) Geodiversity in a changing environment. Scott Geogr J 128(3–4):173–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Henriques MH (2004) Jurassic Heritage of Portugal: state of the art and open problems. Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia i Stratigrafia 110(1):389–392Google Scholar
  27. Henriques MH (2005) The Museu da Pedra (Cantanhede, Central Portugal): where Jurassic meets the public. In: Henriques MH, Azeredo AC, Duarte LV, Ramalho MM (eds) Jurassic heritage and geoconservation in Portugal: Selected Sites, IV International Symposium ProGEO on the Conservation of the Geological Heritage, Field Trip Guide Book, Geosciences Centre, University of Coimbra, pp 45–55Google Scholar
  28. Henriques MH (2010) Paleontologia e Educação para a Sustentabilidade. In: Carvalho IS (ed) Paleontologia, 3rd Edition, Editora Interciência, Rio de Janeiro, vol 1, pp 577–588Google Scholar
  29. Henriques MH, Guimarães FA, Sá AA, Silva E, Brilha J (2010) The International Year of Planet Earth in Portugal: past activities and further developments. Episodes 33(1):33–37Google Scholar
  30. Henriques MH, Pena dos Reis R, Brilha J, Mota TS (2011) Geoconservation as an emerging geoscience. Geoheritage 3(2):117–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Henriques MH, Tomaz C, Sá AA (2012) The Arouca Geopark (Portugal) as an educational resource: a study case. Episodes 35(4):481–488Google Scholar
  32. ICS (2014) Biostratigraphic Units. In: Murphy MA, Salvador A (eds) International Stratigraphic Guide—an abridged version. International Commission on Stratigraphy. http://www.stratigraphy.org/upload/bak/bio.htm. Accessed 31 Aug 2014
  33. ICZN (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, 4th edn. International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London. http://iczn.org/iczn/index.jsp. Accessed 31 Aug 2014
  34. ICZN (2014) About the ICZN. International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. http://iczn.org/content/about-iczn. Accessed 31 Aug 2014
  35. Kim AK, Weiler B (2013) Visitors’ attitudes towards responsible fossil collecting behaviour: an environmental attitude-based segmentation approach. Tour Manag 36:602–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leakey MD (1981) Discoveries at Laetoli in Northern Tanzania. Proc Geol Assoc 92(2):81–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lieberman BS (2005) Geobiology and paleobiogeography: tracking the coevolution of the Earth and its biota. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 219(1–2):23–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lipps JH (2009) PaleoParks: our paleontological heritage protected and conserved in the field worldwide. In: Lipps JH, Granier BRC (eds) PaleoParks—the protection and conservation of fossil sites worldwide, Carnets de Géologie/Notebooks on Geology, Brest, Book 2009/03, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  39. Mampel L, Cobos A, Alcalá L, Luque L, Royo-Torres R (2009) An integrated system of heritage management applied to dinosaur sites in Teruel (Aragón, Spain). Geoheritage 1(2–4):53–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Matthews T (2014) Integrating geoconservation and biodiversity conservation: theoretical foundations and conservation recommendations in a European Union context. Geoheritage 6:57–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McDonald RI, Fielding KS, Louis WR (2014) Conflicting social norms and community conservation compliance. J Nat Conserv 22(3):212–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McMillan AA (2008) The role of the British Geological Survey in the history of geoconservation. In: Burek CV, Prosser CD (eds) The history of geoconservation. Geological Society, Special Publications 300, London, pp 103–112Google Scholar
  43. Noffke N (2005) Geobiology—a holistic scientific discipline. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 219(1–2):1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Page K (2003) The protection of Jurassic sites and fossils: challenges for global Jurassic science (including a proposed statement on the conservation of palaeontological heritage and stratotypes). Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia i Stratigrafia 110(1):373–379Google Scholar
  45. Pereira DI, Pereira P, Brilha J, Santos L (2013) Geodiversity assessment of Parana’ State (Brazil): an innovative approach. Environ Manag 52:541–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pena dos Reis R, Henriques MH (2009) Approaching an integrated qualification and evaluation system of the geological heritage. Geoheritage 1(1):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Percival IG (2014) Protection and preservation of Australia’s palaeontological heritage. Geoheritage. doi: 10.1007/s12371-014-0106-z Google Scholar
  48. Peresani M, Vanhaeren M, Quaggiotto E, Queffelec A, d’Errico F (2013) An ochered fossil marine shell from the Mousterian of Fumane Cave, Italy. PLoS ONE 8(7):e68572. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068572 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Powell J, Nash G, Bell P (2013) GeoExposures: documenting temporary geological exposures in Great Britain through a citizen-science web site. Proc Geol Assoc 124(4):638–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Prosser CD (2013) Our rich and varied geoconservation portfolio: the foundation for the future. Proc Geol Assoc 124(4):568–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Prosser CD, Bridgland DR, Brown EJ, Larwood JG (2011) Geoconservation for science and society: challenges and opportunities. Proc Geol Assoc 122(3):337–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reichenbacher B, Blieck A, Erwin D, Piller W, Sandulescu M, Talent J (2006) Earth and life—origins of diversity. Earth Sciences for Society Foundation, Leiden, The Netherlands, 16 p. http://www.yearofplanetearth.org/content/downloads/EarthAndLife.pdf. Accessed 31 Aug 2014
  53. Reis J, Póvoas L, Barriga FJAS, Lopes C, Santos VF, Ribeiro B, Cascalho J, Pinto A (2014) Science education in a museum: enhancing earth sciences literacy as a way to enhance public awareness of geological heritage. Geoheritage 6:217–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rennie LJ, Feher E, Dierking LD, Falk JH (2003) Toward an agenda for advancing research on science learning in out-of-school settings. J Res Sci Teach 40:112–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schemm-Gregory M, Henriques MH (2013a) The Devonian Brachiopod collections of Portugal—a paleontological heritage. Geoheritage 5(2):107–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schemm-Gregory M, Henriques MH (2013b) Catalogue of the Krantz Brachiopod Collection at the Science Museum of the University of Coimbra (Portugal). Zootaxa 3677(1):1–168. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3677.1.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schemm-Gregory M, Henriques MH (2013c) Os braquiópodes da Coleção Krantz do Museu da Ciência da Universidade de Coimbra/The brachiopods of the Krantz Collection of the University of Coimbra. Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra/Coimbra University Press, CoimbraCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Seilacher A (1953) Über die Methoden der Palichnologie, 1, Studien von Palichnologie. N Jb Geol Paläont (Abh) 96:421–452Google Scholar
  59. Seilacher A, Reif WE, Westphal F (1985) Sedimentological, ecological and temporal patterns of Fossil Lagerstätten. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 311:5–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sookias RB, Budd GE, Kear BP (2013) Mesozoic fossil sustainability: synoptic case studies of resource management. GFF/J Geol Soc Sweden 135(1):131–143Google Scholar
  61. Sousa MAS, Henriques, MH, Sá AA (2014) As exposições escolares como recursos educativos: um estudo de caso centrado nas variações da biodiversidade ao longo do tempo geológico. Boletín de la Real Sociedad Española de Historia Natural, Sección Aula, Museos y Colecciones 1:1–14 (in press)Google Scholar
  62. Stearn WT (1981) The Natural History Museum at South Kensington. Heinemann, LondonGoogle Scholar
  63. Stewart IS, Nield T (2013) Earth stories: context and narrative in the communication of popular geoscience. Proc Geol Assoc 124(4):699–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Thomas MF (2012) Geodiversity and landscape sensitivity: a geomorphological perspective. Scott Geogr J 128(3–4):195–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. UNDB (2014) Strategic goals & targets for 2020. Taking action for biodiversity. United Nations Decade for Biodiversity. http://www.cbd.int/2011-2020/goals/. Accessed 2 Sept 2014
  66. Van Loon AJ (2008) Geological education of the future. Earth Sci Rev 86:247–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Williams D, Edwards D (2013) Moulding and cast replication of outcrops: a tool in geoconservation. Proc Geol Assoc 124(4):648–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Worton GJ (2008) A historical perspective on local communities and geological conservation. In: Burek CV, Prosser CD (eds) The history of geoconservation. Geological Society, Special Publications 300, London, pp 137–146Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The European Association for Conservation of the Geological Heritage 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geosciences Centre, Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Sciences and TechnologyUniversity of Coimbra (Polo II)Rua Sílvio LimaPortugal

Personalised recommendations