Developing Joint Attention for Children with Autism in Robot-Enhanced Therapy
- 514 Downloads
Social difficulties is a core symptom of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). One of the main psychological factors supposed to underlie these difficulties is the lack or low levels of joint attention (JA) with the interaction partners. The use of a social robot in ASD interventions has received a lot of attention in the last years. The main objective of this research is to investigate if the JA performance of ASD children is dependent on the social cues that the robot uses in the therapy sessions. Three different types of social cues are adopted: gaze orientation, pointing and vocal instruction. Furthermore, our study aims also to investigate if the robot-enhanced treatment produces similar patterns in comparison with a standard human treatment. For testing our hypothesis, we have used a single case design involving five children with ASD who received 20 intervention sessions. The results pointed to a very consistent pattern across all types of sessions: using more cues for prompting JA increases the performance of the children. These findings emphasize the importance of using more cues, such as pointing, for increasing engagement and performance engagement in a child–robot interaction session.
KeywordsJoint-attention Robot-enhanced therapy Autism spectrum disorder Cognitive-behavioral therapy
We are thankful for the financial support provided by the European Commission under the Programme EU FP7 ICT-2013.2.1, within the DREAM Project (”Development of Robot-Enhanced therapy for children with AutisM spectrum disorder”). Grant Agreement No. 611391.
Funding This study was funded by European Commission through the 7th Framework Programme Project “Development of Robot-Enhanced therapy for children with AutisM spectrum disorders” (DREAM; http://www.dream2020.eu), Grant Agreement No. 611391.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals
All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): Data & Statistics. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/data.html. Accessed 24 March 2017
- 3.Rogers SJ, Dawson G (2009) Play and engagement in early autism: the early START Denver model. Guilford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 11.Robins B, Dautenhahn K, Dickerson P (2009) From isolation to communication: a case study evaluation of robot assisted play for children with autism with a minimally expressive humanoid robot. In: ACHI’09. Second international conferences on advances in computer–human interactions, 2009. IEEE, pp 205–211Google Scholar
- 15.Damm O, Malchus K, Jaecks P, Krach S, Paulus F, Naber M, Wrede B (2013) Different gaze behavior in human–robot interaction in Asperger’s syndrome: An eye-tracking study. In RO-MAN, 2013 IEEE 368-369. IEEEGoogle Scholar
- 19.David D, Anton R, Stefan S, Mogoase C, Matu S (2010) Adaptation of the autism diagnostic observation schedule. OS Publishing, RomaniaGoogle Scholar
- 20.Tellegen PJ, Winkel M, Wijnberg-Williams BJ, Laros JA (1998) Snijders-Oomen niet-verbale intelligentietest SON-R 2,5-7. Handleiding en verantwoording [Snijders–Oomen nonverbal intelligence test: SON-R 2.5-7. Manual and justification]. Lisse: SwetsGoogle Scholar
- 23.Kazdin AE (1982) Single-case experimental designs in clinical research and practice. New Directions for Methodology of Social & Behavioral ScienceGoogle Scholar
- 24.Cooper JO, Heron TE, Heward WL (2007) Applied behavior analysis, 2nd edn. Pearson, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
- 28.Gouaillier D, Hugel V, Blazevic P, Kilner C, Monceaux J, Lafourcade P, Maisonnier B (2009) Mechatronic design of NAO humanoid. In: Robotics and automation, 2009. ICRA’09. IEEE international conference on 769–774. IEEEGoogle Scholar
- 30.Anzalone SM, Tilmont E, Boucenna S, Xavier J, Jouen AL, Bodeau N MICHELANGELO Study Group (2014) How children with autism spectrum disorder behave and explore the 4-dimensional (spatial 3D+ time) environment during a joint attention induction task with a robot. Res Autism Spectr Disorders 8(7):814–826Google Scholar