Advertisement

International Journal of Social Robotics

, Volume 9, Issue 5, pp 675–690 | Cite as

A Collaborative Homeostatic-Based Behavior Controller for Social Robots in Human–Robot Interaction Experiments

  • Hoang-Long Cao
  • Pablo Gómez Esteban
  • De Beir Albert
  • Ramona Simut
  • Greet Van de Perre
  • Dirk Lefeber
  • Bram Vanderborght
Article

Abstract

Robots have been gradually leaving laboratory and factory environments and moving into human populated environments. Various social robots have been developed with the ability to exhibit social behaviors and collaborate with non-expert users in different situations. In order to increase the degree of collaboration between humans and the robots in human–robot joint action systems, these robots need to achieve higher levels of interaction with humans. However, many social robots are operated under teleoperation modes or pre-programmed scenarios. Based on homeostatic drive theory, this paper presents the development of a novel collaborative behavior controller for social robots to jointly perform tasks with users in human–robot interaction (HRI) experiments. Manual work during the experiments is reduced, and the experimenters can focus more on the interaction. We propose a hybrid concept for the behavior decision-making process, which combines the hierarchical approach and parallel-rooted, ordered, slip-stack hierarchical architecture. Emotions are associated with behaviors by using the two-dimensional space model of valence and arousal. We validate the usage of the behavior controller by a joint attention HRI scenario in which the NAO robot and a therapist jointly interact with children.

Keywords

Homeostasis Behavior controller Social robot Joint action 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work leading to these results has received funding from the European Commission 7th Framework Program as a part of the project DREAM Grant No. 611391. Greet Van de Perre is funded by the Fund for Scientific Research (FWO), Flanders. Ramona Simut is funded by the Government agency for Innovation by Science and Technology (IWT), Flanders. Robotics and Multibody Mechanics Research Group is partner of the Agile and Human Centered Production and Robotic Systems Research Priority of Flanders Make. The authors would like to thank the therapists from Vrije Universiteit Brussel (Belgium) and Babes-Bolyai University (Romania) for their contributions to the system validation.

References

  1. 1.
    Aldebaran robotics: Datasheet NAO Next Gen - H21/H25 Model - English version (2012). https://www.ald.softbankrobotics.com/sites/aldebaran/files/datasheet_nao_next_gen_en.pdf
  2. 2.
    Andrist S, Tan XZ, Gleicher M, Mutlu B (2014) Conversational gaze aversion for humanlike robots. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction. ACM, pp 25–32Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anzalone SM, Tilmont E, Boucenna S, Xavier J, Jouen AL, Bodeau N, Maharatna K, Chetouani M, Cohen D, Group MS et al (2014) How children with autism spectrum disorder behave and explore the 4-dimensional (spatial 3d+ time) environment during a joint attention induction task with a robot. Res Autism Spectr Disord 8(7):814–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arkin RC (1998) Behavior-based robotics. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arkin RC, Fujita M, Takagi T, Hasegawa R (2003) An ethological and emotional basis for human–robot interaction. Robot Auton Syst 42(3):191–201CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bekele E, Crittendon JA, Swanson A, Sarkar N, Warren ZE (2014) Pilot clinical application of an adaptive robotic system for young children with autism. Autism 18(5):598–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berridge KC (2004) Motivation concepts in behavioral neuroscience. Physiol Behav 81(2):179–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Breazeal C (2004) Designing sociable robots. MIT Press, CambridgezbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bryson J (2003) Action selection and individuation in agent based modelling. In: Proceedings of agent, pp 317–330Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bryson JJ (2001) Intelligence by design: principles of modularity and coordination for engineering complex adaptive agents. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cabibihan JJ, Javed H, Ang M Jr, Aljunied SM (2013) Why robots? a survey on the roles and benefits of social robots in the therapy of children with autism. Int J Soc Robot 5(4):593–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Campbell N, Reece J (2008) Biology. Pearson Benjamin Cummings, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cañamero L (2003) Designing emotions for activity selection in autonomous agents. Emot Hum Artifacts 115:148Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cannon WB (1932) The wisdom of the body. Am J Med Sci 184(6):864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cao HL, Esteban PG, De Beir A, Van de Perre G, Simut R, Lefeber D, Vanderborght B (2015) Toward a platform-independent social behavior architecture for multiple therapeutic scenarios. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on social robots in therapy and educationGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Charman T (2003) Why is joint attention a pivotal skill in autism? Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 358(1430):315–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chernova S, DePalma N, Morant E, Breazeal C (2011) Crowdsourcing human–robot interaction: application from virtual to physical worlds. In: RO-MAN, 2011 IEEE. IEEE, pp 21–26Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Damasio A (1994) Descartes’ error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. GP Putnam Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dautenhahn K (2007) Methodology and themes of human-robot interaction: a growing research field. Int J Adv Robot Syst 4(1):15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    De Beir A, Cao HL, Esteban PG, Van de Perre G, Lefeber D, Vanderborght B (2016) Enhancing emotional facial expressiveness on NAO. Int J Soc Robot 8(4):513–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    De Beir A, Cao HL, Esteban PG, Van de Perre G, Vanderborght B (2015) Enhancing NAO expression of emotions using pluggable eyebrows. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on social robots in therapy and educationGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Deak GO, Flom RA, Pick AD (2000) Effects of gesture and target on 12-and 18-month-olds’ joint visual attention to objects in front of or behind them. Dev Psychol 36(4):511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ekman P (1992) Are there basic emotions? Psychol Rev 99(3):550–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Feil-Seifer D, Mataric M (2008) Robot-assisted therapy for children with autism spectrum disorders. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Interaction design and children. ACM, pp 49–52Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fellous JM, Arbib MA (2005) Who needs emotions?: The brain meets the robot. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fong T, Nourbakhsh I, Dautenhahn K (2003) A survey of socially interactive robots. Robot Auton Syst 42(3):143–166CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gómez Esteban P, Cao HL, De Beir A, Van de Perre G, Lefeber D, Vanderborght B (2016) A multilayer reactive system for robots interacting with children with autism. In: Proceedings of the 5th international symposium on new frontiers in human-robot interactionGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hull CL (1943) Principles of behavior: an introduction to behavior theory Appleton-Century, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lazzeri N, Mazzei D, Zaraki A, De Rossi D (2013) Towards a believable social robot. In: Conference on biomimetic and biohybrid systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 393–395Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Leka S, Jain A et al (2010) Health impact of psychosocial hazards at work: an overview. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Loveland K, Landry S (1986) Joint attention and language in autism and developmental language delay. J Autism Dev Disord 16(3):335–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Maes P (1991) A bottom-up mechanism for behaviour selection in an artificial creature. In: Meyer J, Wilson S (eds) From animals to animats: proceedings of the first international conference on simulation of adaptive behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 478–485Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Malfaz M, Castro-González Á, Barber R, Salichs MA (2011) A biologically inspired architecture for an autonomous and social robot. IEEE Trans Auton Mental Dev 3(3):232–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mazzei D, Cominelli L, Lazzeri N, Zaraki A, De Rossi D (2014) I-clips brain: a hybrid cognitive system for social robots. In: Conference on biomimetic and biohybrid systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 213–224Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mook DG (1987) Motivation: the organization of action. W. W. Norton and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mundy P, Delgado C, Block J, Venezia M, Hogan A, Seibert J (2003) Early social communication scales (ESCS). University of Miami, Coral GablesGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mundy P, Gomes A (1998) Individual differences in joint attention skill development in the second year. Infant Behav Dev 21(3):469–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Norman DA, Ortony A, Russell DM (2003) Affect and machine design: lessons for the development of autonomous machines. IBM Syst J 42(1):38–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ortony A, Norman D, Revelle W (2005) Affect and proto-affect in effective functioning. In: Fellous J-M, Arbib MA (eds) Who needs emotions? The brain meets the robot. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 173–202Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Owen-DeSchryver JS, Carr EG, Cale SI, Blakeley-Smith A (2008) Promoting social interactions between students with autism spectrum disorders and their peers in inclusive school settings. Focus Autism Other Dev Disabil 23(1):15–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Van de Perre G, Van Damme M, Lefeber D, Vanderborght B (2015) Development of a generic method to generate upper-body emotional expressions for different social robots. Adv Robot 29(9):597–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Posner J, Russell J, Peterson B (2005) The circumplex model of affect: an integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology. Dev Psychopathol 17(3):715–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Proetzsch M, Luksch T, Berns K (2010) Development of complex robotic systems using the behavior-based control architecture iB2C. Robot Auton Syst 58(1):46–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Read R, Belpaeme T (2014) Situational context directs how people affectively interpret robotic non-linguistic utterances. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction. ACM, pp 41–48Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Riek LD (2012) Wizard of oz studies in HRI: a systematic review and new reporting guidelines. J Hum Robot Interact 1(1):119–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Riek LD (2015) Robotics technology in mental health care. Artificial intelligence in behavioral and mental health care. Academic Press, p 185Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Robins B, Dickerson P, Stribling P, Dautenhahn K (2004) Robot-mediated joint attention in children with autism. Interact Stud 5(2):161–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Saldien J, Goris K, Vanderborght B, Vanderfaeillie J, Lefeber D (2010) Expressing emotions with the social robot probo. Int J Soc Robot 2(4):377–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Saldien J, Vanderborght B, Goris K, Van Damme M, Lefeber D (2014) A motion system for social and animated robots. Int J Adv Robot Syst 11(5):72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Schertz HH, Odom SL (2007) Promoting joint attention in toddlers with autism: a parent-mediated developmental model. J Autism Dev Disord 37(8):1562–1575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Schietecatte I, Roeyers H, Warreyn P (2012) Exploring the nature of joint attention impairments in young children with autism spectrum disorder: associated social and cognitive skills. J Autism Dev Disord 42(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Sloman A, Logan B (2000) Evolvable architectures for human-like minds. In: Affective minds. ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sloman A et al (2001) Beyond shallow models of emotion. Cogn Process Int Q Cogn Sci 2(1):177–198Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Sosnowski S, Bittermann A, Kuhnlenz K, Buss M (2006) Design and evaluation of emotion-display EDDIE. In: 2006 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems. IEEE, pp 3113–3118Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Thill S, Pop CA, Belpaeme T, Ziemke T, Vanderborght B (2012) Robot-assisted therapy for autism spectrum disorders with (partially) autonomous control: challenges and outlook. Paladyn 3(4):209–217Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Thomaz AL, Breazeal C (2008) Teachable robots: understanding human teaching behavior to build more effective robot learners. Artif Intell 172(6):716–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Velásquez JD (1997) Modeling emotions and other motivations in synthetic agents. In: AAAI/IAAI. Citeseer, pp 10–15Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Vouloutsi V, Lallée S, Verschure PF (2013) Modulating behaviors using allostatic control. In: Conference on biomimetic and biohybrid systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 287–298Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Wada K, Shibata T (2006) Robot therapy in a care house-its sociopsychological and physiological effects on the residents. In: Proceedings 2006 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, 2006. ICRA 2006. IEEE, pp 3966–3971Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Warren Z, Zheng Z, Swanson A, Bekele E, Zhang L, Crittendon J, Weitlauf A, Sarkar N (2013) Can robotic interaction improve joint attention skills? J Autism Dev Disord 45(11):3726–3734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Whalen C, Schreibman L (2003) Joint attention training for children with autism using behavior modification procedures. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 44(3):456–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Zheng Z, Zhang L, Bekele E, Swanson A, Crittendon JA, Warren Z, Sarkar N (2013) Impact of robot-mediated interaction system on joint attention skills for children with autism. In: 2013 IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics (ICORR). IEEE, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Zubrycki I, Granosik G (2016) Understanding therapists needs and attitudes towards robotic support. The Roboterapia project. Int J Soc Robot 8(4):553–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Robotics and Multibody Mechanics Research GroupVrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Clinical and Life Span Psychology GroupVrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselsBelgium
  3. 3.Flanders MakeStrategic Research Centre Manufacturing IndustryLommelBelgium

Personalised recommendations