What Effect Does an Animal Robot Called CuDDler Have on the Engagement and Emotional Response of Older People with Dementia? A Pilot Feasibility Study
- 1.4k Downloads
The development of companion animal robots is of growing interest. These robots have recently been marketed to older adults with dementia as a means of encouraging social engagement and reducing behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia. This paper outlines the results of a pilot study that sought to assess the feasibility and effect of using a robotic companion animal called CuDDler on engagement and emotional states of five older adults with dementia living in nursing home care. CuDDler is a prototype robot developed in Singapore. Despite their cognitive decline, the study participants raised a number of concerns regarding the feasibility and tolerability of CuDDler. The effectiveness of CuDDler was also limited in these participants, although one participant with visual agnosia benefited greatly from the one-on-one experience. The findings demonstrate the importance of companion robots being developed that are of an appropriate size, weight and shape for older people, including those with dementia, and a realistic animal shape that does not encourage thoughts of it being a toy. Our conclusions indicate the need for further studies on the development and use of companion robots, and investigation of the comparative benefits of social robots both compared to and in association with human interactions.
KeywordsSocial robots Dementia Older people Long-term care Companion animal
The authors thank Pam Scherman Carr, staff and residents of RSL Care Pinjarra Hills, Brisbane, Australia for their participation in this project, Dr Tan for giving us CuDDler to trial and Dr Rene Hexel and Carl Lusty from IIIS at Griffith University for undertaking maintenance of CuDDler. The Dementia Collaborative Research Centre – Carers and Consumers, Australia, funded this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of Interest
No conflict of interest declared.
The study received ethical approval from Griffith University Human Research Ethics Committee.
- 1.World Health Organisation (WHO), Alzheimer’s Disease International (2012) Dementia. A public health priority. World Health Organisation, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 2.Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2012) Dementia in Australia. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, CanberraGoogle Scholar
- 3.Draper B (2011) Understanding Alzheimer’s & other dementias. Longueville Books, WoollahraGoogle Scholar
- 4.Brodaty H, Draper BM, Low LF (2003) Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: a seven-tiered model of service delivery. Med J Aust 178:231–234Google Scholar
- 14.Fluffy baby robot helps keep you company. http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/onepercent/2011/12/baby-robot.html. Accessed 11 April 2015
- 16.Sellers DM (2006) The evaluation of an animal-assisted therapy intervention for elders with dementia in long-term care. Act Adapt Aging 30:61–77Google Scholar
- 18.Limbu DK, Anthony WCY, Adrian THJ, Tran AD, Kee CT, Tran HD, Alvin WHY, Terence NWZ, Jiang R, Li J (2013) Affective social interaction with CuDDler robot. In: 6th IEEE conference on robotics, automation and mechatronics (RAM), pp 179–184Google Scholar
- 19.Yin RK (2008) Case study research. Design and methods, 4th edn. Sage Publications, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
- 22.O’Bryant SE, Humphreys JD, Smith GE, Lynik RJ, Graff-Radford NR, Petersen RC, Lucas JA (2008) Detecting dementia with the mini-mental state examination in highly educated individuals. Arch Neurol 65:963–967Google Scholar
- 30.Goetz J, Kiesler S, Powers A (2003) Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. In: Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE international workshop on robot and human interaction communication. Millbrae, CA, pp 55–60Google Scholar
- 31.Bartlett B, Estivill-Castro V, Seymon S (2004) Dogs or robots: why do children see them as robotic pets rather than canine machines? In: Proceedings of the fifth conference on Australasian user interface, vol 28. Australian User-Interface Conference AUIC ’04, Dunedin, New Zealand, Australian Computer Society, Inc., pp 7–14Google Scholar
- 33.Lin P, Abney K, Bekey GA (2011) Robot ethics: the ethical and social implications of robotics. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 36.Moyle, W, Beattie E, Draper B, Shum D, Thalib L (2014) Effect of an interactive therapeutic robotic animal on engagement, mood states, agitation and antipsychotic drug use. NHMRC Project Grant APP1065320, 2014-2017Google Scholar