International Journal of Social Robotics

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 85–102 | Cite as

Study of Scenarios and Technical Requirements of a Social Assistive Robot for Alzheimer’s Disease Patients and Their Caregivers

  • Miguel A. Salichs
  • Irene P. Encinar
  • Esther Salichs
  • Álvaro Castro-González
  • María Malfaz
Article

Abstract

Robots have begun to assist elders and patients suffering dementia. In particular, recent studies have shown how robots can benefit Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients. This is a novel area with a promising future but lot of researching needs to be done. The RobAlz project is aimed to assist AD patients and their caregivers by social robots. This project is divided in three phases: the definition of the requirements and scenarios, the development of a new robotic platform, and the evaluation. This work presents the results obtained in the first phase, in which several meetings were conducted with a set of subject-matter experts in the areas of Alzheimer’s Disease and social robotics. The meetings were classified according to the application areas they covered: general aspects, safety, entertainment, personal assistance, and stimulation. The meetings ended up with a repertory of scenarios where robots can be applied to Alzheimer’s patients and their caregivers at their home or in longterm care facilities. These scenarios present different psychological, social and technical concerns that must be addressed for the design of the robot. In this work we perform an analysis on the scenarios and present the technical requirements for the development of a first robotic prototype. This prototype will be constructed and tested in real environments in the subsequent phases of the RobAlz project.

Keywords

Alzheimer Dementia Elderly  Social assistive robot Social robot Assistive robot 

References

  1. 1.
    Antila K, Lötjönen J, Thurfjell L, Laine J, Massimini M, Rueckert D, Zubarev RA, Orešič M, van Gils M, Mattila J, Simonsen AH, Waldemar G, Soininen H (2013) The PredictAD project: development of novel biomarkers and analysis software for early diagnosis of the Alzheimers disease. Interface Focus 3(2):20120072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    World Health Organization and Alzheimer’s Disease International (2012) Dementia: a public health priority. Technical report 112 ppGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hebert LE, Weuve J, Scherr PA, Evans DA (2013) Alzheimer disease in the United States (2010–2050) estimated using the 2010 census. Neurology 80:1778–1783. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31828726f5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Broekens B, Heerink M, Rosendal H (2009) Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review. Gerontechnology 8(2):94–103. doi:10.4017/gt.2009.08.02.002.00 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Feil-seifer D, Matari MJ (2005) Defining socially assistive robotics. Direct Ci: 465–468. doi:10.1109/ICORR.2005.1501143
  6. 6.
    Tapus A, Member S, Scassellati B (2007) The grand challenges in socially assistive robotics. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 14(1):1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tapus A, Tapus C, Mataric MJ (2009) The use of socially assistive robots in the design of intelligent cognitive therapies for people with dementia. doi:10.1109/ICORR.2009.5209501
  8. 8.
    Shibata T, Wada K (2011) Robot therapy: a new approach for mental healthcare of the elderly—a mini-review. Gerontology 57(4):378. doi:10.1159/000319015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wu YH, Fassert C, Rigaud AS (2012) Designing robots for the elderly: appearance issue and beyond. Archiv Gerontol Geriatr 54(1):121. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2011.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mast M, Burmester M, Kruger K, Fatikow S, Arbeiter G, Graf B, Kronreif G, Pigini L, Facal D, Qiu R (2012) User-centered design of a dynamic-autonomy remote interaction concept for manipulation-capable robots to assist elderly people in the home. J Human Robot Interact 1(1):96. doi:10.5898/JHRI.1.1.Mast CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Frennert S, Östlund B (2014) Review: seven matters of concern of social robots and older people. Int J Soc Robot 6(2):299. doi:10.1007/s12369-013-0225-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wada K, Shibatal T, Musha T, Kimura S (2005) In: Intelligent robots and systems, 2005. (IROS 2005). 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on. pp 1552–1557 doi:10.1109/IROS.2005.1545304
  13. 13.
    Furuta Y, Kanoh M, Shimizu T, Shimizu M, Nakamura T (2012) In: 2012 IEEE International conference on fuzzy aystems (Ieee, Brisbane, QLD, 2012), pp 1–4. doi:10.1109/FUZZ-IEEE.2012.6251247
  14. 14.
    Ch. Schroeter HMG, Mueller S, Volkhardt M, Einhorn E, Huijnen C, van den Heuvel H, van Berlo A, Bley A (2013) In: IEEE International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA 2013) (Karlsruhe, Germany, 2013), Icra, pp 1145–1151Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Martín F, Agüero Carlos E, Cañas JM, Valenti M, Martínez-Martín P (2013) Robotherapy with Dementia Patients. Int J Adv Robot Syst 10:1. doi:10.5772/54765 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Broadbent E, Tamagawa R, Kerse N, Knock B, Patience A, MacDonald B (2009) In: Robot and human interactive communication, 2009. RO-MAN 2009. The 18th IEEE International Symposium on, pp 645–650 doi:10.1109/ROMAN.2009.5326284
  17. 17.
    Mayer JM, Zach J (2013) In: Proceedings of the 15th International conference on human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2013), MobileHCI ’13, pp 540–545. doi:10.1145/2493190.2494436 URL http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2493190.2494436
  18. 18.
    Salichs MA, Barber R, Khamis A, Malfaz M, Gorostiza J, Pacheco R, Rivas R, Corrales A, Delgado E, Garcia D (2006) In: 2006 IEEE conference on robotics automation and mechatronics, pp 1–7. doi:10.1109/RAMECH.2006.252754
  19. 19.
    Ramey A, Gorostiza JF, Salichs MA (2012) In: HRI 2012. Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    González-Pacheco V, Ramey A, Alonso-Martin F, Castro-González A, Salichs MA (2011) Maggie: a social robot as a gaming platform. Int J Soc Robot 3(4):371. doi:10.1007/s12369-011-0109-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miguel A. Salichs
    • 1
  • Irene P. Encinar
    • 1
  • Esther Salichs
    • 1
  • Álvaro Castro-González
    • 1
  • María Malfaz
    • 1
  1. 1.Carlos III University of MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations