Why Should We Imitate Robots? Effect of Back Imitation on Judgment of Imitative Skill
- 274 Downloads
How we perceive robots affects how we interact with them and vice versa. This leads us to hypothesize that imitating a robot (back imitation) would affect human’s perception of this robot. More specifically, we suggest that it would lead to the attribution to a higher imitative skill to the robot when it subsequently imitates the human. Given that one of the major challenges in learning from demonstration (imitation) in robotics is the limited number of training examples that the demonstrator is usually willing to provide, it would be beneficial to design the interaction context in such a way to increase human’s subjective evaluation of the robot’s imitative skills and back-imitation may be a way to achieve that. Three studies were conducted—involving 78 subjects and 150 HRI sessions—to evaluate the effect of back imitation on human’s perception of the robot along several dimensions including imitation skill, motion human likeness, interaction quality, humanness and likability. These studies show that people who imitated the robot for few minutes assigned it later higher imitative skill and motion human-likeness. Moreover, back imitation was shown to lead to higher intention of future interaction. The paper reports the results of these studies and discusses their implications for the design of imitation interactions.
KeywordsLearning through imitation Back imitation Perception of robots Social factors in imitation
This study has been carried out with financial support from the Center of Innovation Program from JST, JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 24240023, JSPS Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Postdoctoral Fellows P12046, and AFOSR/AOARD Grant No. FA2386-14-1-0005.
- 1.Argall B, Browning B, Veloso M (2007) Learning by demonstration with critique from a human teacher. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 57–64. doi: 10.1145/1228716.1228725
- 5.Cooper J (2007) Cognitive dissonance: 50 years of a classic theory. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- 8.Grimm LG, Yarnold PR (1995) Reading and understanding multivariate statistics. American Psychological Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- 14.Jones SS (2006) Infants learn to imitate by being imitated. In: Proceedings of the international conference on development and learning (ICDL)Google Scholar
- 17.Lee C, Lesh N, Sidner CL, Morency LP, Kapoor A, Darrell T (2004) Nodding in conversations with a robot. In: CHI’04 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. ACM, pp 785–786Google Scholar
- 18.Mohammad Y, Nishida T (2013) Tackling the correspondence problem: closed-form solution for gesture imitation by a humanoid’s upper body. In: International conference on active media technology (AMT). WIC and IEEE TF-BI. Maebashi, Japan, pp 84–95Google Scholar
- 24.Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 3:425–478Google Scholar