Advertisement

International Journal of Social Robotics

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 575–591 | Cite as

The Role of Healthcare Robots for Older People at Home: A Review

  • Hayley Robinson
  • Bruce MacDonald
  • Elizabeth BroadbentEmail author
Article

Abstract

This review aimed to identify the areas of need that older people have, and the available solutions. In particular, the robotic solutions are explored and critiqued and areas for future development identified. The literature was reviewed for factors that influence admission to nursing home care, and for technological solutions to these factors. The main issues facing older people are physical decline, cognitive decline, health management, and psychosocial issues. Robots exist that may meet some of the identified issues but gaps where robots could be developed include delivering interventions to prevent physical decline occurring and robots with multiple functions, including a range of cognitive stimuli and health education. To reduce barriers to acceptance, robots designed to provide physical and healthcare assistance should have a serious appearance. On the other hand animal-like robots can address psychosocial issues and function like pets. While smart phones and computers can offer some solutions, robots may promote adherence due to a social presence. Robots are being developed to address areas of need in older people, including physical, cognitive, medical and psychosocial issues. However more focus could be placed on developing preventative interventions, multifunctional robots, greater educational content and motivational aspects of appearance and interaction style.

Keywords

Healthcare robots Robotics Ageing Assistive technologies 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI) and Yujin Robot for their valuable contributions and help with the research. We would also like to thank our colleagues at University of Auckland on the HealthBots research team for their ongoing support.

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Gorman M (1999) Development and the rights of older people. In: Randel J (ed) The ageing and development report: poverty independence and the world’s older people. Earthsacen Publications, London, pp 3–21Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Suzman R, Beard J (2011) Global health and aging. National Institute on Aging http://www.nia.nih.gov/research/publication/global-health-and-aging/preface. Accessed 4 Feb 2014
  3. 3.
    Super N (2002) Who will be there to care? The growing gap between caregiver supply and demand. National Health Policy Forum, George Washington University, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Murray MK (2002) The nursing shortage: past, present, and future. J Nurs Admin 32:79–84Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Marek KD, Rantz MJ (2000) Ageing in place: a new model for long-term care. Nurs Admin Quart 24:1–11Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kane RA (2001) Long-term care and a good quality of life: bringing them closer together. Gerontologist 41:293–304Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Agich GJ (2004) Dependence and autonomy in old age. An ethical framework for long-term care. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Manion PS, Rantz MJ (1995) Relocation stress syndrome: a comprehensive plan for long-term care admissions. Geriatr Nurs 16:108–112Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nay R (1995) Nursing home residents’ perceptions of relocation. J Clin Nurs 4:319–325Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rossen EK, Knafl KA (2003) Older women’s response to residential relocation: description of transition styles. Qual Health Res 13:20–36Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Scocco P, Rapattoni M, Fantoni G (2006) Nursing home institutionalization: a source of eustress or distress for the elderly? Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 21:281–287Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davey J (2006) “Ageing in place”: the views of older homeowners on maintenance, renovation and adaptation. Soc Policy J NZ 27:128–141Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Broekens J, Heerink M, Rosendal H (2009) Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review. Gerontechnology 8:94–103Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heerink M, Kröse B, Evers V, Wielinga B (2010) Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: the Almere model. Int J Soc Robot 2:361–375Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Broadbent E, Stafford R, MacDonald B (2009) Acceptance of healthcare robots for the older population: review and future directions. Int J Soc Robot 1:319–330Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scopelliti M, Giuliani MV, Fornara F (2005) Robotics in a domestic setting: a psychological approach. Universal Access Inform Soc 4:146–155Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Frennert S, Östlund B (2014) Review: seven matters of concern of social robots and older people. Int J Soc Robot 6:299– 310Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Broadbent E, Tamagawa R, Patience A, Knock B, Kerse N, Day K, MacDonald BA (2012) Attitudes towards health-care robots in a retirement village. Australas J Ageing 31:115–120Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Broadbent E, Tamagawa R, Kerse N, Knock B, Patience A, MacDonald B (2009) Retirement home staff and residents’ preferences for healthcare robots. In: Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication,Toyama, Japan, 645–650Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Giuliani MV, Scopelliti M, Fornara F (2005) Elderly people at home: technological help in everyday activities. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Workshop on Robots and Human Interactive Communication, Nashville, TN, 365–370Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Boissy P, Corriveauz H, Michaud F, Labontey D, Royer M (2007) A qualitative study of in-home robotic telepresence for home care of community-living elderly subjects. J Telemed Telecare 13: 79–84Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Heerink M, Ben K, Evers V, Wielinga B (2008) The influence of social presence on acceptance of a companion robot by older people. J Phys Agents 2:33–40Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Looije R, Cnossen F, Neerincx MA (2006) Incorporating guidelines for health assistance into a socially intelligent robot. University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, pp 515–520Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    de Ruyter B, Saini P, Markopoulos P, van Breemen AJN (2005) Assessing the effects of building social intelligence in a robotic interface for the home. Interact Comput 17:522–541Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hirvensalo M, Rantanen T, Heikkinen E (2000) Mobility difficulties and physical activity as predictors of mortality and loss of independence in the community-living older population. J Am Geriatr Soc 48:493Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    de Veer AJE, de Baker DH (1994) Measuring unmet needs to assess the quality of home health care. Int J Qual Health Care 6:267–274Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bassuk SS, Glass TA, Berkman LF (1999) Social disengagement and incident cognitive decline in community-dwelling elderly persons. Ann Intern Med 133:165–173Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Freedman VA, Berkman LF, Rapp SR, Ostfeld AM (1994) Family networks: predictors of nursing home entry. AJ Pub Health 84:843–845Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Freedman VA (1996) Family structure and the risk of nursing home admission. J Gerontol 2:61–69Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Elkan R, Kendrick D, Dewey M, Hewitt M, Robinson J, Blair M, Williams D, Brummell K (2001) Effectiveness of home based support for older people: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 323:1–9Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sands LP, Wang Y, McCabe GP, Jennings K, Eng C, Covinsky KE (2006) Rates of acute care admissions for frail older people living with met versus unmet activity of daily living needs. J Am Geriatr Soc 54:339–344Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stuck AE, Siu AL, Wieland GD, Adamis J, Rubenstein LZ (1993) Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Lancet 342:1032–1036Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gaugler JE, Duval S, Anderson KA, Kane RL (2007) Predicting nursing home admission in the U.S: a meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr 7:1–14Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gooberman-Hill R, Ebrahim S (2007) Making decisions about simple interventions: older people’s use of walking aids. Age Ageing 36:569–573Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kennedy J (2001) Unmet and undermet need for activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living assistance among adults with disabilities: estimates from the 1994 and 1995 disability follow-back surveys. Med Care 39:1305–1312Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Allen SM, Mor V (1997) The prevalence and consequences of unmet need: contrasts between older and younger adults with disability. Med Care 35:1132–1148Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Alonso J, Orfila F, Ruigomez A, Ferret M, Anto JM (1997) Unmet health care needs and mortality among Spanish elderly. Am J Pub Health 87:365–370Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chenier MC (1997) Review and analysis of caregiver burden and nursing home placement: the multiple problems and variables affecting the caregiving relationships require multiple approaches and interventions. Geriatr Nurs 18:121–126Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tennstedt S, McKinlay J, Kasten L (1994) Unmet need among disabled elders: a problem in access to community long term care? Soc Sci Med 38:915–924Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Cumming RG, Salkeld G, Thomas M, Szonyi G (2000) Prospective study of the impact of fear of falling on activities of daily living, SF-36 scores, and nursing home admission J Gerontol. Med Sci 55A:299–305Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tinetti M, Williams CS (1997) Falls, injuries due to falls, and the risk of admission to a nursing home. New Engl J Med 337:1279–1284Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gillespie LD, Robertson MC, Gillespie WJ, Lamb SE, Gates S, Cumming RG, Rowe BH (2009) Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD007146Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sattin RW (1992) Falls among older persons: a public health perspective. Ann Rev Pub Health 13:489–508Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gill TM, Baker DI, Gottschalk M, Peduzzi PP, Allore H, Byers A (2002) A program to prevent functional decline in physically frail, elderly persons who live at home. New Engl J Med 347:1068–74Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Stafford RQ, MacDonald BA, Broadbent E (2012) Identifying specific reasons behind unmet needs may inform more specific eldercare robot design. In: Gee SS, Khatib O, Cabibihan JJ, Simmons R, Williams MA (eds) Social robotics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 148–157Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Mahani M, Eklundh KS (2009) A survey of the relation of the task assistance of a robot to its social role. KTH Computer Science and Communication, Royal Institute of Technology, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Boulos MN, Wheeler S, Tavares C, Jones R (2011) How smartphones are changing the face of mobile and participatory healthcare: an overview, with example from eCAALYX. Biomed Eng Online 10:24Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sposaro F, Danielson J, Tyson G (2010) iWander: An android application for dementia patients. The 2010 Annual conference of the IEEE, Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Buenos Aires, Argentina, pp 3875–3878Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Chan M, Bocquet H, Campo E, Val T, Pous J (1999) Alarm communication network to help carers of the elderly for safety purposes: a survey of a project. Int J Rehabil Res 22:131–136Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Abowd GD, Bobick AF, Essa IA, Mynatt ED, Rogers WA (2002) The aware home: a living laboratory for technologies for successful aging. AAAI Technical Report WS-02-02Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    McConatha D, McConatha JT, Dermingny R (1994) The use of interactive computer services to enhance the quality for life for long-term care residents. Gerontologist 34:553–556Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Gietzelt D (2001) Computer and internet use among a group of Sydney seniors: a pilot study. Austr Acad Res 32:137–152Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Olsen RV, Hutchings BL, Ehrenkrantz E (2000) “Media memory lane” interventions in an Alzheimer’s day care centre. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Dement 15:163–175Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Mihailidis A, Boger J, Craig T, Hoey J (2008) The COACH prompting system to assist older adults with dementia through handwashing: an efficacy study. BMC Geriatr 8:28–46Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Devor M, Wang A, Renvall M, Feigal D, Ramsdell J (1994) Compliance with social and safety recommendations in an outpatient comprehensive geriatric assessment program. J Gerontol 49:M168–M173Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Foulk E (2007) Lonely robots ignored by elderly ludites. The New Zealand Herald. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/story.cfm?c_id=5&objectid=10465061. Accessed 28 Sep 2012
  57. 57.
    Yi-Lin S (2005) Other devices and high technology solutions. In: Mann WC (ed) Smart technology for aging, disability, and independence. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 49–82Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Davenport RD (2005) Robotics. In: Mann WC (ed) Smart technology for aging, disability, and independence. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 83–126Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Rentschler AJ, Cooper RA, Blasch B, Boninger ML (2003) Intelligent walkers for the elderly: performance and safety testing of VA-PAMAID robotic walker. J Rehabil Res Dev 40:423– 431Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Noury N (2005) AILISA: Experimental platforms to evaluate remote care and assistive technologies in gerontology. In: Proceedings of 7th international workshop on enterprise networking and computing in healthcare industry HEALTHCOM 2005, Busan, Korea, pp 67–72Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Graf B, Hans M, Schraft RD (2004) Care-O-bot II—development of a next generation robotic home assistant. Auton Robots 16: 193–205Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Pollack ME, Engberg S, Matthews JT, Thrun S, Brown L, Colbry D, Orosz C, Peintner B, Ramakrishnan S, McCarthy CE, Montemerlo M, Pineau J, Roy N, Dunbar-Jacob J (2002) Pearl: a mobile robotic assistant for the elderly. AAAI Technical Report WS-02-02Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Brooke J (2004) Japan: Japan seeks robotic help in caring for the aged. http://www.globalaging.org/elderrights/world/2004/japaninvention.htm. Accessed 20 Sep 2012
  64. 64.
    Eriksson J, Mataric MJ, Winstein CJ (2005) Hands-off assistive robotics for post-stroke arm rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Chicago, IL, pp 21–24Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Mann JA, MacDonald BA, Kuo I, Li X, Broadbent E (2014) People respond better to robots than computer tablets delivering healthcare instructions (in submission)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Kidd CD, Breazeal C (2008) Robots at home: understanding long-term human-robot interaction. In: Proceeding of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Nice, France, pp 3230–3235Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Kiesler S, Powers A, Fussell SR, Torrey C (2008) Anthropomorphic interactions with a robot and robot-like agent. Soc Cogn 26:169–181Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Black BS, Rabins PV, German PS (1999) Predictors of nursing home placement among elderly public housing residents. Gerontologist 39:559–568Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Ferri CP, Prince M, Brayne C, Brodaty H, Fratiglioni L, Ganguli M, Hall K, Hasegawa K, Hendrie H, Huang Y, Jorm A, Mathers C, Menezes PR, Rimmer E, Scazufca M (2006) Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study. Lancet 366:2112–2117Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Agüero-Torres H, von Strauss E, Viitanen M, Winblad B, Fratiglioni L (2001) Institutionalization in the elderly: the role of chronic diseases and dementia. Cross-sectional and longitudinal data from a population-based study. J Clin Epidemiol 54:795–801Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Brodaty H, Green A, Koschera A (2003) Meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for caregivers of people with dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 51:657–664Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Ory MG, Hoffman RR, Yee JL, Tennstedt S, Schulz R (1999) Prevalence and impact of caregiving: a detailed comparison between dementia and nondementia caregivers. Gerontologist 39:177–186Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Yaffe K, Fox P, Newcomer R, Sands L, Lindquist K, Dane K, Covinsky KE (2002) Patient and caregiver characteristics and nursing home placement in patients with dementia. JAMA 287:2090–2097Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Wilson RS, Mendes de Leon CF, Barnes LL, Schneider JA, Bienias JL, Evans DA, Bennett DA (2002) Participation in cognitively stimulating activities and risk of incident Alzheimer disease. JAMA 287:742–748Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Willis SL, Tennstedt SL, Marsiske M, Ball K, Elias J, Koepke KM, Morris JN, Rebok GW, Unverzagt FW, Stoddard AM, Wright A (2006) Long-term effects of cognitive training on everyday functional outcomes in older adults. JAMA 296:2805–2814Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Ball K, Berch DB, Helmers KF, Jobe JB, Leveck MD, Marsiske M, Morris JN, Rebok GW, Smith DM, Tennstedt SL, Unverzagt FW, Willis SL (2002) Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288:2271–2281Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Chan D, Kasper JD, Black BS, Rabins PV (2003) Presence of behavioral and psychological symptoms predicts nursing home placement in community-dwelling elders with cognitive impairment in univariate but not multivariate analysis. J Gerontol 58A:548–554Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Lauriks S, Reinersmann A, Van der Roest HG, Meiland FJM, Davies RJ, Moelaert F, Mulvenna MD, Nugent CD, Droes RM (2007) Review of ICT-based services for identified unmet needs in people with dementia. Ageing Res Rev 6:223–246Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Astell AJ, Ellis MP, Bernardi L, Alm N, Dye R, Gowans G, Campbell J (2010) Using a touch screen computer to support relationships between people with dementia and caregivers. Interact Comput 22:267–275Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Gunther VK, Schafer P, Holzner BJ, Kemmler GW (2003) Long-term improvements in cognitive performance through computer-assisted cognitive training: a pilot study in a residential home for older people. Aging Ment Heath 7:200–206Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Poon P, Hui E, Dai D, Kwok T, Woo J (2005) Cognitive intervention for community-dwelling older persons with memory problems: telemedicine versus face-to-face treatment. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 20:285–286Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Broadbent E, Jayawardena C, Kerse N, Stafford RQ, MacDonald A (2011) Human-robot interaction research to improve quality of life in elder care: an approach and issues. In: Proceedings of the 25th Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Workshop on Human-Robot Interaction in Elder Care. San Francisco, CA, pp 13–19Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Robinson H, MacDonald BA, Kerse N, Broadbent E (2013) Suitability of healthcare robots for a dementia unit and suggested improvements. JAMDA 14:34–40Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Lee D, Yamazaki T, Helal S (2009) Robotic companions for smart space interactions. Pervasive Comput 8:78–84Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Goetz J, Kiesler S (2002) Cooperation with a robotic assistant. In: Terveen L, Wixon D (eds) CHI’02 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. ACM Press, Minneapolis, pp 578–579Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Corlett AJ (1996) Aids to compliance with medication. BMJ 313:926–929Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    van Eijken M, Tsang S, Wensing M, de Smet PAG, Grol RPTM (2003) Interventions to improve medication compliance in older patients living in the community: a systematic review of the literature. Drugs Aging 20:229–240Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Haynes RB, McKibbon KA, Kanai R (1996) Systematic review of randomised trials of interventions to assist patients to follow prescriptions for medications. Lancet 348:383–386Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Sale JE, Gignac M, Hawker G (2006) How “bad” does the pain have to be? A qualitative study examining adherence to pain medication in older adults with osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 55:272–278Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Kippen S, Fraser M, Ellis J (2005) As time goes by: issues for older people with their medication use. Australas J Ageing 24:103–107Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Campbell R, Pound P, Pope C, Britten N, Pill R, Morgan M, Donovan J (2003) Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Soc Sci Med 56:671–684Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Mancia G, Sega R, Milesi C, Cesana G, Zanchetti A (1997) Blood-pressure control in the hypertensive population. Lancet 349:454–457Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Benson J, Britten N (2006) What effects do patients feel from their antihypertensive tablets and how do they react to them? Qualitative analysis of interviews with patients. Fam Pract 23:80–87Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Cline CM, Bjorck-Linne AK, Israelsson BY, Willenheimer RB, Erhardt LR (1999) Non-compliance and knowledge of prescribed medication in elderly patients with heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2:145–149Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Senior V, Marteau TM, Weinman J (2004) Self-reported adherence to cholesterol lowering medication in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia: the role of illness perceptions. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 6:475–481Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Chin MH, Goldman L (1997) Correlates of early hospital admissions or death in patients with congestive cardiac failure. Am J Cardiol 79:1640–1644Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Banning M (2009) A review of interventions used to improve adherence to medication in older people. Int J Nurs Stud 46:1505–1515Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Schroeder K, Fahey T, Ebrahim S (2004) Interventions for improving adherence to treatment in patients with high blood pressure in ambulatory settings (review). Cochrane Database Syst 2:CD004804Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Siek KA, Rogers Y, Connelly KH (2005) Human-computer Interaction-INTERACT 2005. In: Costabile MF, Paterno F (eds) Fat finger worries: how older and younger users physically interact with PDAs, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 267–280Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Sterns AA (2005) Curriculum design and program to train older adults to use personal digital assistants. Gerontologist 45:828– 834Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Buckwater KC, Davis LL, Wakefield BJ, Kienzle MG, Murray MA (2002) Telehealth for elders and their caregivers in rural communities. Fam Com Health 25:31–40Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Barlow J, Singh D, Bayer S, Curry R (2007) A systematic review of the benefits of home telecare for frail elderly people and those with long-term conditions. J Telemed Telecare 13:172– 179Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Hassol A, Walker JM, Kidder D, Rokita K, Young D, Pierdon S, Deitz D, Kuck S, Ortiz E (2004) Patient experiences and attitudes about access to a patient electronic health care record and linked web messaging. J Am Med Inform Assoc 11:505–513Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Blake H (2008) Innovation in practice: mobile phone technology in patient care. Br J Commun Nurs 13:160–165Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Kailas A, Chong CC, Watanabe F (2010) From mobile phones to personal wellness dashboards. IEEE Pulse 1:57–63Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Arsand E, Froisland DH, Skrovseth SO, Chomutare T, Tatara N, Hartvigsen G, Tufano JT (2012) Mobile health applications to assist patients with diabetes: lessons learned and design implications. J Diab Sci Technol 6:1197–1206Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Hicks J (2012) Hector: robotic assistance for the elderly. http://www.forbes.com/sites/jenniferhicks/2012/08/13/hector-robotic-assistance-for-the-elderly/. Accessed 20 Sep 2012
  108. 108.
    Belew B (2007) Japan’s Ifbot understands language and emotional tone, gets rejected. Rising Sun of Nihon. http://www.risingsunofnihon.com/japanese-products/japans-ifbot-understands-langu/. Accessed 20 Sep 2012
  109. 109.
    Duggan A (2004) Robo-pet: a human’s best friend? http://www.iol.co.za/scitech/technology/robo-pet-a-human-s-best-friend-1.212637#.UHiomFLvaSo. Accessed 20 Sep 2012
  110. 110.
    Onishi K (2006) Wakamaru, the robot for your home. J Jpn Soc Mech Eng 109:448–449Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Lytle JM (2002) Robot care bears for the elderly. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/1829021.stm. Accessed 20 Sept 2012
  112. 112.
    Steinbach U (1992) Social networks, institutionalization, and mortality among elderly people in the United States. J Gerontol 47:I83–I90Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Caciopoppo JT, Hawkley LC, Crawford LE, Ernst JM, Burleson MH, Kowalewski RB, Malarkey WB, Van Cauter E, Berntson GG (2002) Loneliness and health: potential mechanisms. Adv Psychosom Med 64:407–417Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    O’Luanaigh C, Lawlor BA (2008) Loneliness and the health of older people. Intl J Geriatr Psychiatry 23:1213–1221Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Tilvis RS, Kahonen-Vare MH, Jolkkonen J, Valvanne J, Pitkala KH, Strandberg TE (2004) Predictors of cognitive decline and mortality of aged people over a 10-year period. J Gerontol 59:268–274Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Wilson RS, Krueger KR, Arnold SE, Schneider A, Kelly JF, Barnes LL, Tang Y, Bennett DA (2007) Loneliness and risk of Alzheimer disease. Arch Gen Psychiatry 64:234–240Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Adams KB, Sanders S, Auth EA (2004) Loneliness and depression in independent living retirement communities: risk and resilience factors. Aging Ment Health 8:475–485Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Holmen K, Ericsson K, Winblad B (1999) Quality of life among the elderly: state of mood and loneliness in two selected groups. Scand J Caring Sci 13:91–95Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Friedmann E, Thomas SA (1995) Pet ownership, social support, and one-year survival after acute myocardial infarction in the cardiac arrhythmia suppression trial (CAST). Am J Cardiol 76:1213–1217Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Raina P, Waltner-Toews D, Bonnett B, Woodward C, Abernathy T (1999) Influence of companion animals on the physical and psychological health of older people: an analysis of a one-year longitudinal study. J Am Geriatr Soc 47:323–329Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Siegel JM (1993) Companion animals: in sickness and in health. J Soc Issue 49:157–167Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Garrity TF, Stallones L, Marx MB, Johnson TP (1989) Pet ownership and attachment as supportive factors in the health of the elderly. Anthrozoos 3:35–44Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Fine AH, Beck A (2010) Understanding our kinship with animals: input for health care professionals interested in the human/animal bond. In: Fine AH (ed) Handbook on animal-assisted therapy: theoretical foundations and guidelines for practice, 3rd edn. Academic Press, London, pp 3–15Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Comijs HC, van Tilburg T, Geerlings SW, Jonker C, Deeg DJ, van Tilburg W, Beekman AT (2004) Do severity and duration of depressive symptoms predict cognitive decline in older persons? results of the longitudinal aging study Amsterdam. Aging Clin Exp Res 16:226–232Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    Surprenant AM, Neath I (2007) Cognitive aging. In: Wilmoth JM, Ferraro KM (eds) Gerontology: perspectives and issues, 3rd edn. Springer Publishing Company, New York, pp 89–110Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    Burnette D, Mui AC (1994) Determinants of self-reported depressive symptoms by frail elderly persons living alone. J Gerontol Soc Work 22:3–20Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Harris Y, Cooper JK (2006) Depressive symptoms in older people predict nursing home admission. J Am Geriatr Soc 54: 593–597Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Bruce ML, Seeman TE, Merrill SS, Blazer DG (1994) The impact of depressive symptomatology on physical disability: Macarthur studies of successful aging. Am J Pub Health 84:351–358Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    Guccione AA, Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Anthony JM, Zhang Y, Wilson PWF, Kelly-Hayes M, Wolf PA, Kreger BE, Kannel WB (1994) The effects of specific medical conditions on the functional limitations of elders in the Framingham study. Am J Pub Health 84:351–358Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Banerjee S, Shamash K, Macdonald AJ, Mann AH (1996) Randomised controlled trial of effect of intervention by psychogeriatric team on depression in frail elderly people at home. BMJ 313:1058–1061Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    Chew-Graham CA, Lovell K, Roberts C, Baldwin R, Morley M, Burns A, Burroughs H (2007) A randomised controlled trial to test the feasibility of a collaborative care model for the management of depression in older people. Br J Gen Pract 57: 364–370Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    Hirsch T, Forlizzi J, Hyder E, Goetz J, Kurtz C, Stroback J (2000) The ELDer project: Social, emotional and environmental factors in the design of eldercare technologies. In: Proceedings on the 2000 Conference of Universal Usability, Arlington, USA, pp 72–79Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    Horrocks S, Somerset M, Stoddart H, Peters TJ (2004) What prevents older people from seeking treatment for urinary incontinence? Fam Pract 21:689–696Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    Bradley N, Poppen W (2003) Assistive technology, computers and Internet may decrease sense of isolation for homebound elderly and disabled persons. Technol Disabil 15:19–25Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    Kivett VR (1979) Discriminators of loneliness among the rural elderly: implications for intervention. Gerontologist 19: 108–115Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    Mahani M, Eklundh KS (2009) A survey of the relation of the task assistance of a robot to its social role. KTH Computer Science and Communication, Royal Institute of Technology, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Lekeu F, Wojtasik V, Linden MVD, Salmon E (2002) Training early Alzheimer patients to use a mobile phone. Acta Neurol Belg 102:114–121Google Scholar
  138. 138.
    Mickus MA, Luz CC (2002) Televisits: sustaining long distance family relationships among institutionalized elders through technology. Aging Ment Health 6:387–396Google Scholar
  139. 139.
    Savenstedt S, Brulin C, Sandman PO (2003) Family members’ narrated experiences of communicating via video-phone with patients with dementia staying at a nursing home. J Telemed Telecare 9:216–220Google Scholar
  140. 140.
    Shibata T, Tanie K (2001) Physical and affective interaction between human and mental commit robot. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Seoul, Korea, pp 2572–2577Google Scholar
  141. 141.
    Kato S, Ohshiro S, Itoh H, Kimura K (2004) Development of a communication robot Ifbot. Proc IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom 1:697–702Google Scholar
  142. 142.
    Banks MR, Willoughby LM, Banks WA (2008) Animal-assisted therapy and loneliness in nursing homes: use of robotic versus living dogs. JAMDA 9:173–177Google Scholar
  143. 143.
    Wada K, Shibata T, Kawaguchi Y (2009) Long-term robot therapy in a health service facility for the aged: a case study for 5 years: a case study for five years. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Kyoto, Japan, pp 930– 933Google Scholar
  144. 144.
    Wada K, Shibata T, Saito T, Tanie K (2004) Effects of Three months robot assisted activity to depression of elderly people who stay at a health service facility for the aged. In: Proceedings of the SCIE 2004 Annual Conference, Sapporo, Japan, pp 2709– 2714Google Scholar
  145. 145.
    Robinson H, MacDonald B, Kerse N, Broadbent E (2013) A randomized controlled trial. The psychosocial effects of a companion robot. JAMDA 14(9):661–667Google Scholar
  146. 146.
    Baun M, Johnson R (2010) Human-animal interaction and successful aging. In: Fine A (ed) Handbook on animal-assisted therapy, 3rd edn. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 283–299Google Scholar
  147. 147.
    Shibata T, Kawaguchi Y, Wada K (2009) Investigation on people living with Paro at home. In: Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Toyama, Japan, pp 1131–1136Google Scholar
  148. 148.
    Friedman B, Kahn PH, Hagman J (2003) Hardware Companions? What Online AIBO Discussion Forums Reveal about the Human-Robotic Relationship. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. CHI ’03. 273–280. Ft. Lauderdale, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    Kahn PH, Friedman B, Hagman J (2002) I care about him as a pal: conceptions of robotic pets in online AIBO discussion forums. In: Proceedings of the CHI ’02 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, New York, NY, pp 632–633Google Scholar
  150. 150.
    Broekens J, Heerink M, Rosendal H (2009) Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review. Gerontechnology 8:94–103Google Scholar
  151. 151.
    Bemelmans R, Gelderblom GJ, Jonker P, de Witte L (2012) Socially assistive robots in elderly care: a systematic review into effects and effectiveness. JAMDA 13:114–120Google Scholar
  152. 152.
    Pain H, Gale CR, Watson C, Cox V, Cooper C, Sayer AA (2007) Readiness of elders to use assistive devices to maintain their independence in the home. Age Ageing 36:465–467Google Scholar
  153. 153.
    Mukai T, Onishi M, Odashima T, Hirano S, Zhiwei L (2008) Development of the tactile sensor system of a human-interactive robot “RI-MAN”. IEEE Trans Robot 24:505–512 Google Scholar
  154. 154.
    Dario P, Guglielmelli E, Laschi C, Teti G (1999) MOVAID: a personal robot in everyday life of disabled and elderly people. Technol Disabil 10:77–93Google Scholar
  155. 155.
    Libin AV, Cohen-Mansfield J (2004) Therapeutic robocat for nursing home residents with dementia: preliminary inquiry. Am J Alzheimer’s Dis Other Demen 19:111–116Google Scholar
  156. 156.
    Taggart W, Turkle S, Kidd CD (2005) An interactive robot in a nursing home: preliminary remarks. In: Proceedings of Toward Social Mechanisms of Android Science, Stresa, Italy, pp 56– 61Google Scholar
  157. 157.
    Stiehl WD, Lieberman J, Breazeal C, Basel L, Cooper R, Knight H, Lalla L, Maymin A, Purchase S (2006) The huggable: a therapeutic robotic companion for relational, affective touch. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, Las Vegas: NV. pp 1290– 1291Google Scholar
  158. 158.
    Kriglstein S, Wallner G (2005) HOMIE: an artificial companion for elderly people. In: Proceedings of The CHI’05: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Portland, Oregon, pp 2094–2098Google Scholar
  159. 159.
    Heerink M, Krose B, Evers V, Wielinga B (2006) The influence of a robot’s social abilities on acceptance by elderly users. In: Proceedings of the 15th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication RO-MAN 06 Hatfield, UK, pp 521–526Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hayley Robinson
    • 1
  • Bruce MacDonald
    • 2
  • Elizabeth Broadbent
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Psychological MedicineThe University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringThe University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  3. 3.Department of Psychological MedicineThe University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations