Investigation on People Living with Seal Robot at Home
- 609 Downloads
This study examined people living with Paro, a seal robot, and how they interact with it. Questionnaires were sent along with Paro to the owners who could voluntarily choose to respond. Eighty-five responses were obtained and analyzed in terms of gender, preference for animals, and pet ownership experience. The results showed that for females, besides “can touch and hug,” “tactile texture” is also an important reason for keeping Paro. In addition, owners’ preference for animals seems to influence how they touch Paro. Owners who have a dislike or no preference for animals tend to touch Paro differently than do those who like animals, seemingly because of their different playing styles. Moreover, owners who have pet ownership experience tend to talk to Paro more when they wake up and go to sleep compared to owners who have never kept pets. Furthermore, owners who have pet ownership experience demand a “collar” as an accessory for Paro more than do those who have no previous experience of keeping pets. This paper presents and analyzes data on the effects of owners’ gender and pet ownership experience on their interactions with Paro.
KeywordsMental commitment robot Human-robot interaction
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Kato S, Ohshiro S, Itoh H, Kimura K (2004) Development of a communication robot Ifbot. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, vol 1, pp 697–702 Google Scholar
- 6.Wada K, Shibata T, Musha T, Kimura S (2008) Robot therapy for elders affected by dementia. In: IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, pp 53–60 Google Scholar
- 9.Shibata T, Tanie K (2001) Physical and affective interaction between human and mental commit robot. In: Proceedings of the IEEE, international conference on robotics & automation, Seoul, Korea, May 2001, pp 2572–2577 Google Scholar
- 10.Wada K, Shibata T, Musha T, Kimura S (2008) Robot therapy for elders affected by dementia. In IEEE engineering in medicine and biology, pp 53–60 Google Scholar