International Journal of Social Robotics

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 299–312

Problems and Issues for Service Robots in New Applications

Original Paper

Abstract

Service robots give the possibility of new fields of applications for Robotics by wide spreading robots also into no technical areas. But requirements and goals need to be carefully revised both in designing and operating specific solutions. In this paper, main aspects and challenges are discussed both as problems and advantages in using robots in service operations for new areas of applications, by taking particular attention to non engineering aspects that are deduced from new service areas. In particular, two novel applications, with direct experience of the author and his team, are discussed as referring to robots for restoration activity of historical goods, and robots for physiotherapy rehabilitation and training, as examples with many very different aspects and backgrounds, but even with common issues. Key problems for developing service robots for a successful acceptance and use by even no technical users can be considered in terms of specific technical problems for low-cost user-oriented operation systems, but mainly in terms of implications for human-machine interactions.

Keywords

Service robots Design procedure Design constraints Human-machine interaction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    ICRA (2010) Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Anchorage, 3–8 May 2010. http://icra2010.grasp.upenn.edu/?q=overview. Accessed 20 December 2010
  2. 2.
    ICORR (2009) Proceedings of IEEE 11th international conference on rehabilitation robotics, Kyoto, 23–26 June 2009. http://www.icorr2009.org/. Accessed 20 December 2010
  3. 3.
    Zelinsky (2008) Part F: Field and service robotics. In: Siciliano AB, Khatib O (eds) Springer handbook of robotics. Springer, Berlin. ISBN: 978-3-540-23957-4 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dallaway JL, Jackson RD, Timmers PHA (1995) Rehabilitation robotics in Europe. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 3:35–45 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jackson RD (1993) Robotics and its role in helping disabled people. Eng Sci Educ J 1993:267–272 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Meng Q, Lee MH (2006) Design issues for assistive robotics for the elderly. Adv Eng Inform 20:171–186 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    IFR (2010) International Federation of Robotics: service robots. http://www.ifr.org/service-robots/. Accessed 20 December 2010
  8. 8.
    EUROP (2009) Robot vision—to 2020 and beyond, the strategic research agenda for European robotics. Brussels Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ceccarelli M, Romdhane L (2009) Design issues for human-machine platform interface in cable-based parallel manipulators for physiotherapy applications. J Zhejiang Univ Sci 11:231–239. doi:10.1631/jzus.A1000027 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ceccarelli M, Ottaviano E (2008) Cable-based parallel manipulators of rehabilitation purposes of human limbs. In: Proceedings of 2nd international colloquium collaborative research centre, vol 52, Braunschweig, pp 53–67 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    LARM webpage (2010) http://webuser.unicas.it/weblarm/larmindex.htm. Accessed 20 December 2010
  12. 12.
    Grande S (2008) Development and operation of cable-based parallel manipulators for medical applications. LARM Internal Report, LARM, Cassino (in Italian) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ottaviano E, Ceccarelli M, Palmucci F (2009) An application of CaTraSys, a cable-based parallel measuring system for an experimental characterization of human walking. Robotica. doi:10.1017/S0263574709005645 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ottaviano E, Ceccarelli M, Paone A, Carbone G (2005) A low-cost easy-operation 4-cable driven parallel manipulator. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on robotics and automation ICRA’05, Barcelona, pp 4019–4024 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cigola M, Ceccarelli M (2008) A robot application for analysis, survey and conservation of historical architectures. In: Robotics and automation in construction. I-Tech Education and Publishing KG, Wien, pp 328–354. ISBN 978-953-7619-13-8 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ceccarelli M, Cigola M, Ottaviano E, Gallozzi A, Carbone G, Pelliccio A (2002) A study of feasibility of using robots in architecture analysis and survey of a historical pavement. In: Proceedings of 11th international workshop on robotics in Alpe-Adria-Danube Region RAAD2002, Balatonfured, pp 113–118 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science & Business Media BV 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LARM: Laboratory of Robotics and Mechatronics, at DiMSATUniversity of CassinoCassinoItaly

Personalised recommendations