International Journal of Social Robotics

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 65–75 | Cite as

Experiments on Stochastic Resonance Toward Human Mimetic Tactile Data Processing

  • Masahiro OhkaEmail author
  • Kadir Beceren
  • Tao Jin
  • Abdullah Chami
  • Hanafiah Bin Yussof
  • Tetsu Miyaoka


In the present research, human tactile stochastic resonance (SR) capable of enhancing sensitivity by superimposing proper noise upon undetectable weak signals is utilized to enhance the tactile processing method for social robotics. We develop an experimental apparatus composed of a piezoelectric actuator and its controller, and generate a step several microns high mixed with noise to perform a series of psychophysical experiments. Since psychophysical experiments are conducted based on the Parameter Estimation by Sequential Testing (PEST) method, we produce a PEST program that generates a stimuli sequence based on PEST. The experimental result shows that variation in the difference threshold (Difference Limen; DL) has a local minimum point in the relationship between DL and noise. Therefore, the tactile sensation’s just noticeable difference (JND) is decreased by appropriate external noise. Since JND denotes the scale divisions of sensation in the human mind, the present result shows that precise tactile sensations are enhanced by the appropriate external noise. Finally, we introduce a neural network model composed of nonlinear neurons with the bi-stable equilibrium condition to explain this result. Although original sensor data do not represent the morphology of the fine texture, the neural network model extracts the morphology and distinguishes the wave amplitude of the fine texture.


Tactile sensor Complex systems Stochastic resonance Human sensation Neural network Psychophysical experiment 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Herrmann G, Melhuish C (2010) Towards safety in human robot interaction. Int J Soc Robot 2:217–219 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tanaka M, Lévêque L, Tagami H, Kikuchi K, Chonan S (2003) The “haptic finger”—a new device for monitoring skin condition. Skin Res Technol 9:131–136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hosoda K, Tada Y, Asada M (2006) Anthropomorphic robotic soft fingertip with randomly distributed receptors. Robot Auton Syst 54:104–109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shirado H, Maeno T (2005) Modeling of human texture perception for tactile displays and sensors. In: The first joint eurohaptics conference and symposium on haptic interface for virtual environment and teleoperator systems: 57–58 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moss F, Wiesenfeld K (1995) The benefits of background noise. Sci Am 273(2):50–53 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gammaitoni L, Hänggi P, Jung P, Marchesoni F (1998) Stochastic resonance. Rev Mod Phys 70(1):223–287 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gluckman BJ, Netoff TI, Neel RJ, Ditto WL, Spano ML, Schiff SJ (1996) Stochastic resonance in a neuronal network from mammalian brain. Phys Rev Lett 77(19):4098–4101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kanamaru T, Horita T, Okabe Y (1998) Stochastic resonance in the Hodgkin-Huxley network. J Phys Soc Jpn 67(12):4058–4063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chik DTW, Wang Y, Wang ZD (2001) Stochastic resonance in a Hodgkin-Huxley neuron in the absence of external noise. Phys Rev 64:021913 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schmid G, Goychuk I, Hänggi P (2001) Stochaerhstic resonance as a collective property of ion channel assemblies. Europhys Lett 56(1):22–28 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sakumaru Y, Aihara K (2002) Stochastic resonance and coincidence detection in single neurons. Neural Process Lett 16(2002):235–242 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Collins JJ, Imhoff TT, Grigg P (1997) Noise-mediated enhancements and decrements in human tactile sensation. Phys Rev E 56(1):923–926 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gescheider GA (1997) Psychophysics: the fundamentals. Lawrence Erlbaum associates Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Taylor MM, Creelman CD (1967) PEST: efficient estimation provability functions. J Acoust Soc Am 41(4):782–787 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ohka M, Kondo S (2009) Stochastic resonance aided tactile sensing. Robotica 27:633–639 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hodgkin AL, Huxley AF (1952) A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol 117:500–544 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miyaoka T, Ohka M (1997) Tactile information processing mechanisms of fine surface texture discrimination in humans: a study with ridge height discrimination tasks. In: Int, ergonomics association 13th triennial congress of the IEA, vol 7, pp 264–266 Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Miyaoka T, Mano T, Ohka M (1999) Mechanisms of fine-surface-texture discrimination in human tactile sensation. J Acoust Soc Am 105(4):2485–2492 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Miyaoka T (2004) Measurements of detection thresholds presenting normal and tangential vibrations on human glabrous skin. In: Proceedings of the twentieth annual meeting of the international society for psychophysics, vol 20, pp 465–470 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Miyaoka T (2005) Mechanoreceptive mechanisms to determine the shape of the detection-threshold curve presenting tangential vibrations on human glabrous skin. In: Proceedings of the 21st annual meeting of the international society for psychophysics, vol 21, pp 211–216 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science & Business Media BV 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masahiro Ohka
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kadir Beceren
    • 1
  • Tao Jin
    • 1
  • Abdullah Chami
    • 1
  • Hanafiah Bin Yussof
    • 2
  • Tetsu Miyaoka
    • 3
  1. 1.Graduate School of Information ScienceNagoya UniversityNagoyaJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringUniversiti Teknologi MARAShah AlamMalaysia
  3. 3.Faculty of Comprehensive InformaticsShizuoka Institute of Science and TechnologyFukiroiJapan

Personalised recommendations