International Journal of Social Robotics

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 235–252

Safety Analysis for a Human-Friendly Manipulator

  • Sami Haddadin
  • Alin Albu-Schäffer
  • Gerd Hirzinger
Article

Abstract

The DLR Lightweight Robot III (LWR-III) developed at the German Aerospace Center (DLR) is characterized by low inertial properties, torque sensing in each joint, and a load to weight ratio similar to humans. These properties qualify it for applications requiring high mobility and direct interaction with human users or uncertain environments. An essential requirement for such a robot is that it must under no circumstances pose a threat to the human operator. To actually quantify the potential injury risk emanating from the manipulator, impact test were carried out using standard automobile crash-test facilities at the ADAC (German automobile club). Furthermore, we introduce our analysis for soft-tissue injury based on swine experiments with the LWR-III. This paper gives an overview about the variety of investigations necessary to provide a safety analysis of a human-friendly robot based on biomechanical injury results. We believe this paper can provide a guideline for the robotics community for future qualifications of other robots and thus serve as a key component to bring robots in our everyday life.

Keywords

Human-friendly robot Robot safety Physical Human-Robot Interaction Crash-testing Soft-tissue injury Collision detection 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Albu-Schäffer A, Ott C, Hirzinger G (2007) A unified passivity-based control framework for position, torque and impedance control of flexible joint robots. Int J Robot Res 26:23–39 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    For the Advancement of Automotive medicine, A. (1998) The Abbreviated Injury Scale (1990) Revision Update 1998. Des Plaines/IL Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bicchi A, Tonietti G (2004) Fast and soft arm tactics: dealing with the safety-performance trade-off in robot arms design and control. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 11:22–33 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Luca A, Albu-Schäffer A, Haddadin S, Hirzinger G (2006) Collision detection and safe reaction with the DLR-III lightweight manipulator arm. In: IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp 1623–1630 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Edlich R, Rodeheaver G, Morgan R, Berman DE, Thacker J (1988) Principles of emergency wound management. Ann Emerg Med 17:1284–1302 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edlich R, Tafel J, Smith J, Morgan R (1987) Facitious skin wounds. Compr Ther 13:57–60 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eisenmenger W (2004) Handbuch gerichtliche Medizin—Spitze, scharfe und halbscharfe Gewalt. Springer, Berlin Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    EN953 (1997) Safety of Machinery—Guards—General requirements for the design and construction of fixed and movable guards Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    EuroNCAP (2003) European protocol new assessment programme—assessment protocol and biomechanical limits Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    EuroNCAP (2004) European protocol new assessment programme—frontal impact testing protocol Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fazekas I, Kosa F, Bajnoczky I, Jobba G, Szendrenyi J (1972) Mechanische Untersuchung der Kraft durchbohrender Einstiche an der menschlichen Haut und verschiedenen Kleidungsschichten. Z Rechtsmed 70:235–240 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Haddadin S, Albu-Schäffer A, De Luca A, Hirzinger G (2008) Collision detection & reaction: a contribution to safe physical human-robot interaction. In: IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS2008), Nice, France, pp 3356–3363 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haddadin S, Albu-Schäffer A, De Luca A, Hirzinger G (2008) Evaluation of collision detection and reaction for a human-friendly robot on biological tissue. In: IARP International Workshop on Technical Challenges and for Dependable Robots in Human Environments (IARP2008), Pasadena, USA. www.robotic.de/Sami.Haddadin
  14. 14.
    Haddadin S, Albu-Schäffer A, Hirzinger G (2007) Safe physical human-robot interaction: measurements, analysis & new insights. In: International Symposium on Robotics Research (ISRR2007), Hiroshima, Japan, pp 439–450 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Haddadin S, Albu-Schäffer A, Hirzinger G (2007) Safety evaluation of physical human-robot interaction via crash-testing. Robotics: Science and Systems Conference (RSS2007) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haddadin S, Albu-Schäffer A, Hirzinger G (2008) The role of the robot mass and velocity in physical human-robot interaction—part I: Unconstrained blunt impacts. In: IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA2008), Pasadena, USA, pp 1331–1338 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Haddadin S, Albu-Schäffer A, Hirzinger G (2010) Soft-tissue injury in robotics. In: IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA2010), Anchorage, Alaska Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heinzmann J, Zelinsky A (2003) Quantitative safety guarantees for physical human-robot interaction. Int J Robot Res 22(7–8):479–504 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ikuta K, Ishii H, Nokata M (2003) Safety evaluation method of design and control for human-care robots. Int J Robot Res 22(5):281–298 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    ISO10218 (2006) Robots for industrial environments—safety requirements—part 1: Robot Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kallieris D (2004) Handbuch gerichtliche Medizin. Springer, Berlin Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kuppa S (2004) Injury criteria for side impact dummies. NHTSA Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lau I, Viano D (1983) Role of impact velocity and chest compression in thoracic injury. Aviat Space Environ Med 56 Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lau I, Viano D (1985) Thoracic impact: a viscous tolerance criterion. In: Tenth Experimental Safety Vehicle Conference Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lau I, Viano D (1986) The viscous criterion—bases and applications of an injury severity index for soft tissues. In: Proceedings of 30th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Technical Paper No 861882 Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lim HO, Tanie K (2000) Human safety mechanisms of human-friendly robots: passive viscoelastic trunk and passively movable base. Int J Robot Res 19(4):307–335 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    McElhaney J, Stalnaker R, Roberts V (1972) Biomechanical aspects of head injury. In: Human impact response—measurement and simulation Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    NHTSA (1997) Actions to reduce the adverse effects of air bags. FMVSS No 208 Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ott C, Albu-Schäffer A, Kugi A, Stramigioli S, Hirzinger G (2004) A passivity based cartesian impedance controller for flexible joint robots—part I: torque feedback and gravity compensation. In: IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp 2666–2672 Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Prasad P, Mertz H (1985) The position of the US delegation to the ISO working group 6 on the use of HIC in automotive environment. SAE Paper 851246 Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Prasad P, Mertz H (1991) Hybrid III sternal deflection associated with thoracic injury severities on occupants restrained with force-limiting shoulder belts. SAE Paper 910812 Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Prasad P, Mertz H, Nusholtz G (1985) Head injury risk assessment for forehead impacts. SAE Paper 960099 Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tonietti G, Schiavi R, Bicchi A (2006) Optimal mechanical/control design for safe and fast robotics. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, vol. 21. Springer, Berlin Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Versace J (1971) A review of the severity index. In: Proc 15th stapp conference, SAE Paper No 710881 Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Weber W, Schweitzer H (1973) Stichversuche an Leichen mit unterschiedlicher kinetischer Energie. Beitr Gerichtl Med 31:180–184 Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Workgroup D.P.V.S. (2004) Crash analysis criteria version 1.6.1 Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zinn M, Khatib O, Roth B (2004) A new actuation approach for human friendly robot design. Int J Robot Res 23:379–398 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zinn M, Khatib O, Roth B, Salisbury JK (2002) Playing it safe—human-friendly robots. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 11:12–21 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science & Business Media BV 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sami Haddadin
    • 1
  • Alin Albu-Schäffer
    • 1
  • Gerd Hirzinger
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Robotics and MechatronicsDLR—German Aerospace CenterWesslingGermany

Personalised recommendations