Interaction with a Moving Object Affects One’s Perception of Its Animacy
- 375 Downloads
Sometimes we regard just an artifact as a lifelike one and other times not; it is considered to depend on how we deal and interact with the artifact. We experimentally examined whether differences in the manner of interacting with a moving robot (operating it or only observing its movements) influenced one’s perception of the robot’s animacy and, if so, whether the strength of this influence depended on the apparent goal-directedness of the robot’s movements. We found that people only observing the robot perceived it most animated when its movements seemed most goal-directed but that people controlling the robot perceived it more animated when 1/f noise made its movements seem less goal-directed. Our perception of a moving object’s animacy thus depends on whether we interact with the object or just observe it while someone else interacts with it. This result suggests that robotics researchers should design how a robot interacts with its users, in order to elicit higher degree of animacy perception for the robot.
KeywordsAnimacy perception Moving robot Human-robot interaction
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Michotte A (1963) The perception of causality. Basic Books, New York Google Scholar
- 3.Baron-Cohen S (1995) Mindblindness. MIT Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
- 5.Tremoulet PD, Feldman J (2000) The influence of spatial context and the role of intentionality in the interpretation of animacy from motion. Perception 68:1047–1058 Google Scholar
- 6.Tremoulet PD, Feldman J (2006) The influence of spatial context and the role of intentionality in the interpretation of animacy from motion. Percept Psychophys 68:1047–1058 Google Scholar
- 12.Lee KM, Park NH, Song H (2005) Can a robot be perceived as a developing creature? Hum Commun Res 31:538–563 Google Scholar
- 19.Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (2006) e-puck educational robot. www.e-puck.org
- 22.Braitenberg V (1984) Vehicles: experiments in synthetic psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
- 28.Adolphs R (2003) Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci 1:4165–4178 Google Scholar
- 37.Ishiguro I (2005) Android science: toward a new cross-interdisciplinary framework. Proc Cogsci2005, workshop, pp 1–6 Google Scholar
- 38.Mori M (1970) Bukimi no tani (uncanny valley). Energy 7:33–35 Google Scholar