International Journal of Social Robotics

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 157–169 | Cite as

Humanoid Robots as a Broadcasting Communication Medium in Open Public Spaces

  • Daisuke Sakamoto
  • Kotaro Hayashi
  • Takayuki Kanda
  • Masahiro Shiomi
  • Satoshi Koizumi
  • Hiroshi Ishiguro
  • Tsukasa Ogasawara
  • Norihiro Hagita
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper reports a method that uses humanoid robots as a communication medium. Even though many interactive robots are being developed, their interactivity remains much poorer than that of humans due to their limited perception abilities. In our approach, the role of interactive robots is limited to a broadcasting medium for exploring the best way to attract people’s interest to information provided by robots. We propose using robots as a passive social medium, in which they behave as if they are talking together. We conducted an eight-day field experiment at a train station to investigate the effects of such a passive social medium.

Keywords

Humanoid robot Field experiment Broadcasting information service 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sakamoto D, Kanda T, Ono T, Kamashima M, Imai M, Ishiguro H (2005) Cooperative embodied communication emerged by interactive humanoid robots. Int J Hum Comput Stud 62:247–265 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cassell J, Bickmore T, Billinghurst M, Campbell L, Chang K, Vilhjalmsson H, Yan H (1999) Embodiment in conversational interfaces: rea. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 1999, pp 520–527 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kidd CD, Breazeal C (2004) Effect of a robot on user perceptions. In: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, 2004, vol 4, pp 3559–3564 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wada K, Shibata T, Saito T, Tanie K (2004) Effects of robot-assisted activity for elderly people and nurses at a day service center. Proc IEEE 92(11):1780–1788 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dautenhahn K, Werry I (2002) A quantitative technique for analysing robot-human interactions. In: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, 2002, vol 2, pp 1132–1138 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kozima H, Nakagawa C, Yasuda Y (2005) Interactive robots for communication-care: A case-study in autism therapy. In: Proceedings of IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, 2005, pp 341–346 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tanaka F, Cicourel A, Movellan JR (2007) Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(46):17954–17958 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Siegwart R (2003) Robox at Expo.02: a large scale installation of personal robots. Robot Auton Syst 42:203–222 MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shiomi M, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2006) Interactive humanoid robots for a science museum. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on human-robot interaction, 2006, pp 305–312 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gockley R, Forlizzi J, Simmons R (2006) Interactions with a moody robot. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on human-robot interaction, 2006, pp 186–193 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kanda T, Hirano T, Eaton D, Ishiguro H (2004) Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: a field trial. Hum-Comput Interact 19(1–2):61–84 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hayashi K, Sakamoto D, Kanda T, Shiomi M, Koizumi S, Ishiguro H, Ogasawara T, Hagita N (2007) Humanoid robots as a passive-social medium: a field experiment at a train station. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, 2007, pp 137–144 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Walster E, Festinger L (1962) The effectiveness of “overheard” persuasive communication. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 65(6):395–402 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Suzuki SV, Yamada S (2004) Persuasion through overheard communication by life-like agents. In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on intelligent agent technology, 2004, pp 225–231 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Takeuchi Y, Katagiri Y (2002) Social dynamics in Web page through inter-agent interaction. Trans Jpn Soc Artif Intell 17(4):439–448 MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shinozawa K, Naya F, Yamato J, Kogure K (2005) Differences in effect of robot and screen agent recommendations on human decision-making. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 62(2):267–279 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sakamoto D, Kanda T, Ono T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2007) Android as a telecommunication medium with human like presence. In: Proceedings of 2nd ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, 2007, pp 193–200 Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nakanishi H, Nakazawa S, Ishida T, Takanashi K, Isbister K (2003) Can software agents influence human relations? Balance theory in agent-mediated communities. In: Proceedings of the second international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, 2003, pp 717–724 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sakamoto D, Ono T (2006) Sociality of robots: do robots construct or collapse human relations? In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on human-robot interaction, 2006, pp 355–356 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hayashi K, Kanda T, Miyashita T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2005) Robot Manzai—robots’ conversation as a passive social medium. In: Proceedings of 5th IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots, 2005, pp 456–462 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Imai M, Ono T (2004) Development and evaluation of interactive humanoid robots. Proc IEEE 92(11):1839–1850 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science & Business Media BV 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daisuke Sakamoto
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kotaro Hayashi
    • 2
    • 3
  • Takayuki Kanda
    • 2
  • Masahiro Shiomi
    • 2
  • Satoshi Koizumi
    • 4
  • Hiroshi Ishiguro
    • 4
  • Tsukasa Ogasawara
    • 3
  • Norihiro Hagita
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science, Graduate School of Information Science and TechnologyThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  2. 2.ATR Intelligent Robotics and Communication LaboratoriesKeihanna Science CityJapan
  3. 3.Nara Institute of Science and TechnologyIkoma CityJapan
  4. 4.Osaka UniversitySuitaJapan

Personalised recommendations