Advertisement

International Journal of Social Robotics

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 3–18 | Cite as

Keepon

A Playful Robot for Research, Therapy, and Entertainment
  • Hideki Kozima
  • Marek P. Michalowski
  • Cocoro Nakagawa
Original Paper

Abstract

Keepon is a small creature-like robot designed for simple, natural, nonverbal interaction with children. The minimal design of Keepon’s appearance and behavior is meant to intuitively and comfortably convey the robot’s expressions of attention and emotion. For the past few years, we have been observing interactions between Keepon and children at various levels of physical, mental, and social development. With typically developing children, we have observed varying styles of play that suggest a progression in ontological understanding of the robot. With children suffering from developmental disorders such as autism, we have observed interactive behaviors that suggest Keepon’s design is effective in eliciting a motivation to share mental states. Finally, in developing technology for interpersonal coordination and interactional synchrony, we have observed an important role of rhythm in establishing engagement between people and robots. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of work done with Keepon to date.

Keywords

Human-robot interaction Robot design Social development Autism therapy Rhythmic synchrony Interpersonal coordination 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    American Psychiatric Association (1994) DSM-IV: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Arlington Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baird G, Simonoff E, Pickles A, Chandler S, Loucas T, Meldrum D, Charman T (2006) Prevalence of disorders of the autism spectrum in a population cohort of children in South Thames: The Special Needs and Autism Project (SNAP). Lancet 368:210–215 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baron-Cohen S (1995) Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. MIT Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bernieri FJ, Rosenthal R (1991) Interpersonal coordination: Behavior matching and interactional synchrony. In: Feldman RS, Rime B (eds) Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 401–432 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Billard A (2002) Play, dreams and imitation in Robota. In: Dautenhahn K et al. (eds) Socially intelligent agent. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 165–173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Breazeal C, Scassellati B (2000) Infant-like social interactions between a robot and a human caretaker. Adapt Behav 8:49–74 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burgoon JK, Stern LA, Dillman L (1995) Interpersonal adaptation: Dyadic interaction patterns. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Butterworth G, Jarrett N (1991) What minds have in common is space: Spatial mechanisms serving joint visual attention in infancy. Br J Dev Psychol 9:55–72 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chapple ED (1982) Movement and sound: The musical language of body rhythms in interaction. In: Davis M (ed) Interaction rhythms: Periodicity in communicative behavior. Human Sciences Press, New York, pp 31–51 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Condon WS, Ogston WD (1966) Sound film analysis of normal and pathological behavior patterns. J Nerv Ment Dis 143:338–347 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Condon WS, Ogston WD (1967) A segmentation of behavior. J Psychiatr Res 5:221–235 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Condon WS, Ogston WD (1971) Speech and body motion synchrony or the speaker-hearer. In: Horton DL, Jenkins JJ (eds) Perception of language. Charles E Merrill, Columbus, pp 150–173 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Condon WS, Sander LW (1974) Synchrony demonstrated between movements of the neonate and adult speech. Child Dev 45(2):456–462 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Condon WS, Sander LW (1974) Neonate movement is synchronized with adult speech: Interactional participation and language acquisition. Science 183(4120):99–101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cruz RF, Berrol CF (2004) Dance/movement therapists in action: A working guide to research options. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dalton KM, Nacewicz BM, Johnstone T, Schaefer HS, Gernsbacher MA, Goldsmith HH, Alexander AL, Davidson RJ (2005) Gaze fixation and the neural circuitry of face processing in autism. Nat Neurosci 8:519–526 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dautenhahn K (1997) I could be you: The phenomenological dimension of social understanding. Cybern Syst J 28:417–453 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dautenhahn K (1999) Robots as social actors: Aurora and the case of autism. In: Proceedings of the international cognitive technology conference, pp 359-374 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    DeCasper AJ, Fifer WP (1980) Of human bonding: Newborns prefer their mothers’ voices. Science 208:1174–1176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dennett DC (1987) The intentional stance. MIT Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fantz RL (1961) The origin of form perception. Sci Am 204:66–72 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fernald A, Mazzie C (1991) Prosody and focus in speech to infants and adults. Dev Psychol 27:209–221 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fledderjohn H, Sewickley J (1993) An annotated bibliography of dance/movement therapy, 1940–1990. American Dance Therapy Association, Columbia Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Frith U (1989) Autism: Explaining the enigma. Blackwell, London Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kaye K (1982) The mental and social life of babies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kendon A (1970) Movement coordination in social interaction: Some examples described. Acta Psychol 32:100–125 Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kendon A (1990) Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kozima H (2002) Infanoid: A babybot that explores the social environment. In: Dautenhahn X et al. (eds) Socially intelligent agent. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 157–164 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kozima H, Ito A (2003) From joint attention to language acquisition. In: Leather J, van Dam J (eds) Ecology of language acquisition. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 65–81 Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kozima H, Nakagawa C, Yano H (2004) Can a robot empathize with people? Int J Artif Life Robot 8:83–88 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kozima H, Nakagawa C (2006) Interactive robots as facilitators of children’s social development. In: Mobile robots: Toward new applications, pp 269–286 Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kozima H, Nakagawa C, Yasuda Y (2007) Children-robot interaction: A pilot study in autism therapy. Prog Brain Res 164:385–400 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Meltzoff AN, Moore MK (1977) Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science 198:75–78 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Michalowski MP, Sabanovic S, Kozima H (2007) A dancing robot for rhythmic social interaction. In: Proceedings of the 2nd annual conference on human-robot interaction (HRI 2007), pp 89–96 Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Michalowski MP, Kozima H (2007) Methodological issues in facilitating rhythmic play with robots. In: Proceedings of the 16th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN 2007) Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Michaud F, Théberge-Turmel C (2002) Mobile robotic toys and autism. In: Dautenhahn K et al. (eds) Socially intelligent agent. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 125–132 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Morton J, Johnson MH (1991) Conspec and conlearn: A two-process theory of infant face recognition. Psychol Rev 98:164–181 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Nadel J, Butterworth G (1999) Imitation in infancy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Okada M, Goan M (2005) Modeling sociable artificial creatures: Findings from the Muu project. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on perception and action Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Robins B, Dickerson P, Stribling P, Dautenhahn K (2004) Robot-mediated joint attention in children with autism: A case study in robot-human interaction. Interact Stud 5:161–198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Scassellati B (2005) Using social robots to study abnormal social development. In: Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on epigenetic robotics, pp 11–14 Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Scheirer E (1998) Tempo and beat analysis of acoustic music signals. J Acoust Soc Am 103(1):588–601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tomasello M (1999) The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tomasello M, Carpenter M, Call J, Behne T, Moll H (2005) Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behav Brain Sci 28(5):675–691 Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Trevarthen C (2001) Intrinsic motives for companionship in understanding: Their origin, development, and significance for infant mental health. Infant Ment Health J 22:95–131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Trevarthen C, Malloch SN (2000) The dance of wellbeing: Defining the musical therapeutic effect. Nord J Music Ther 9(2):3–17 Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Vygotsky LS (1934/1962) Thought and language. MIT Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    World Health Organization (1993) The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioral disorders: Diagnostic criteria for research. World Health Organization, Geneva Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zlatev J (2001) The epigenesis of meaning in human beings, and possibly in robots. Minds Mach 11:155–195 zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hideki Kozima
    • 1
  • Marek P. Michalowski
    • 2
  • Cocoro Nakagawa
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute of Information and Communications TechnologySeikaJapan
  2. 2.Robotics InstituteCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations