Advertisement

Sugar Tech

pp 1–12 | Cite as

Sugarcane Bagasse Ash-Blended Concrete for Effective Resource Utilization Between Sugar and Construction Industries

  • T. Murugesan
  • R. VidjeapriyaEmail author
  • A. Bahurudeen
Research Article
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

Sugarcane bagasse ash can be used as an alternative cementitious material. However, lack of performance evaluation hinders its effective utilization in concrete. Therefore, performance assessment of bagasse ash in concrete is essential and a combined utilization of bagasse ash and marble waste is not reported in the current literature. In the present study, sugarcane bagasse ash and marble waste were used in concrete as an alternative for cement and fine aggregate, respectively. Bagasse ash-blended concrete paver blocks were cast and performance evaluation of paver specimens in terms of compressive strength, breaking load, abrasion resistance, water absorption was determined. Incorporation of marble waste as an alternative material to the commonly used fine aggregate led to a significant improvement in abrasion resistance and marginal improvement in the compressive strength. Results from the experimental study showed that there was a significant improvement in strength and durability of bagasse ash-blended concrete specimens up to 20% replacement level when compared to the conventional concrete specimens.

Keywords

Sugarcane bagasse ash Marble waste Pozzolan Durability Paver block Blended cement 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animals Rights

Authors declare no research involving human participants and/or animals was conducted.

References

  1. Alyamac, Kursat Esat, and Ragip Ince. 2009. A preliminary concrete mix design for SCC with marble powders. Construction and Building Materials 23: 1201–1210.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.08.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ASTM International. 2018. ASTM C311-18: Standard test methods for sampling and testing fly ash or natural pozzolans for use in portland-cement concrete. West Conshohocken, PA.  https://doi.org/10.1520/C0311.
  3. ASTM International. 2019. ASTM C618-19: Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete. West Conshohocken, PA.  https://doi.org/10.1520/C0618-19.
  4. Bahurudeen, A., D. Kanraj, V. Gokul Dev, and M. Santhanam. 2015a. Performance evaluation of sugarcane bagasse ash blended cement in concrete. Cement & Concrete Composites 59: 77–88.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.03.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bahurudeen, A., and M. Santhanam. 2015. Influence of different processing methods on the pozzolanic performance of sugarcane bagasse ash. Cement & Concrete Composites 56: 32–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bahurudeen, A., K.S. Vaisakh, and Manu Santhanam. 2015b. Availability of sugarcane bagasse ash and potential for use as a supplementary cementitious material in concrete. Indian Concrete Journal 89 (6): 41–50.Google Scholar
  7. Batra, V.S., S. Urbonaite, and G. Svensson. 2008. Characterization of unburned carbon in bagasse fly ash. Fuel 87: 2972–2976.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2008.04.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bureau of Indian Standards. 2005. IS 4031-3: Methods of physical tests for hydraulic cement. Determination of soundness. New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  9. Bureau of Indian Standards. 2005. IS 4031-4: Methods of physical tests for hydraulic cement. Determination of consistency of standard cement paste. New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  10. Bureau of Indian Standards. 2005. IS 4031-5: Methods of physical tests for hydraulic cement. Determination of initial and final setting times. New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  11. Bureau of Indian Standards. 2005. IS 4031-6: Methods of physical tests for hydraulic cements. Determination of compressive strength of hydraulic cement. New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  12. Bureau of Indian Standards. 2004. IS 1727: Methods of test for Pozzolanic materials. New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  13. Bureau of Indian Standards. 2006. IS 15658: Indian standard precast concrete block for paving-specification. New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  14. Bureau of Indian Standards. 2008. IS 12269: Specification for 53 grade ordinary portland cement. New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  15. Bureau of Indian Standards. 2012. IS 1237: Cement concrete flooring tiles-specification. New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  16. Bureau of Indian Standards. 2016. IS 383: Coarse and fine aggregate for concrete-specification. New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  17. Cordeiro, G.C., R.D. Toledo Filho, L.M. Tavares, and E.M.R. Fairbairn. 2008. Pozzolanic activity and filler effect of sugar cane bagasse ash in Portland cement and lime mortars. Cement and Concrete Composites 30: 410–418.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cordeiro, G.C., R.D.T. Filho, L.M. Tavares, and E.M.R. Fairbairn. 2012. Experimental characterization of binary and ternary blended-cement concretes containing ultrafine residual rice husk and sugar cane bagasse ashes. Construction and Building Materials 29: 641–646.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cordeiro, G.C., V.A. Pryscila, and L.M. Tavares. 2019. Pozzolanic properties of ultra fine sugar cane bagasse ash produced by controlled burning. Heliyon 5: e02566.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02566.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Corinaldesi, V., G. Moriconi, and T.R. Naik. 2010. Characterization of marble powder for its use in mortar and concrete. Construction and Building Materials 24: 113–117.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.08.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Deepika, S., G. Anand, A. Bahurudeen, and Manu Santhanam. 2017. Construction products with sugarcane bagasse ash binder. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 29: 04017189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. DIMI. 2013. Development of Indian mining industryThe way forward non-fuel minerals: 1–120. FICCI Mines and Metals Division. India. http://ficci.in/spdocument/20317/Mining-Industry.pdf Accessed 14 Dec 2019.
  23. DIN 1048: Part-5. 1991. German standard for determination of permeability of concrete. Google Scholar
  24. Gameiro, F., J. de Brito, and D. Correia da Silva. 2014. Durability performance of structural concrete containing fine aggregates from waste generated by marble quarrying industry. Engineering Structures 59: 654–662.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.11.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ganesan, K., K. Rajagopal, and K. Thangavel. 2007. Evaluation of bagasse ash as supplementary cementitious material. Cement & Concrete Composites 29: 515–524.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gencel, O., O. Cengiz, F. Koksal, E. Erdogmus, G.M. Barrera, and W. Brostow. 2012. Properties of concrete paving blocks made with waste marble. Journal of Cleaner Production 21: 62–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.08.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gopinath, A., A. Bahurudeen, S. Appari, and P. Nanthagopalan. 2018. A circular framework for the valorisation of sugar industry wastes: Review on the industrial symbiosis between sugar, construction and energy industries. Journal of Cleaner Production 203: 89–108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Martirena Hernández, J.F., B. Middendorf, M. Gehrke, and H. Budelmann. 1998. Use of wastes of the sugar industry as pozzolana in lime-pozzolana binders: Study of the reaction. Cement and Concrete Research 28: 1525–1536.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00130-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Saboya, F., G.C. Xavier, and J. Alexandre. 2007. The use of the powder marble by-product to enhance the properties of brick ceramic. Construction and Building Materials 21: 1950–1960.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.05.029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Srinivasan, R., and K. Sathiya. 2018. Experimental study on bagasse ash in concrete. International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, Humanitarian Engineering and Social Entrepreneurship 5: 60–66.  https://doi.org/10.24908/ijsle.v5i2.2992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. South African National Standard. 2018. SANS 3001- Part CO3-1: Concrete durability index testingPreparation of test specimens. Cape Town, South Africa.Google Scholar
  32. Talah, A., F. Kharchi, and R. Chaid. 2015. Influence of marble powder on high performance concrete behavior. Procedia Engineering 114: 685–690.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Topçu, İlker Bekir, Turhan Bilir, and Tayfun Uygunoğlu. 2009. Effect of waste marble dust content as filler on properties of self-compacting concrete. Construction and Building Materials 23: 1947–1953.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.09.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Villar-Cociña, Ernesto, Moisés Frías, Jesús Hernández-Ruiz, and Holmer Savastano. 2013. Pozzolanic behaviour of a bagasse ash from the boiler of a Cuban sugar factory. Advances in Cement Research 25: 136–142.  https://doi.org/10.1680/adcr.11.00066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. WBCSD/IEA. 2018. World Business Council for Sustainable Development/International Energy Agency Technology Roadmap: Low carbon transition in the cement industry. Paris, France. https://www.wbcsd.org/Sector-Projects/Cement-Sustainability-Initiative/Resources/Low-Carbon-Technology-Roadmap-for-the-Indian-Cement-Sector-Status-Review-2018. Accessed 14 Dec 2019.

Copyright information

© Society for Sugar Research & Promotion 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringGovernment College of EngineeringSalemIndia
  2. 2.Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering GuindyAnna UniversityChennaiIndia
  3. 3.Department of Civil EngineeringBirla Institute of Technology and ScienceHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations