Sugar Tech

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 105–108 | Cite as

Exploring Alternative Treatment Method for Sugar Industry Effluent Using ‘Spirulina platensis’

  • Amol DeshmaneEmail author
  • Deepali Nimbalkar
  • T. D. Nikam
  • Vikram S. Ghole
Short Communication


Sugarcane cultivation and sugar industry plays a very important role in the socio-economics of rural areas of Maharashtra. Untreated discharge of sugar mill effluent can affect surface and/or ground water, soil as well as crops/plants. The objective of the present research was to explore a simple, easy to operate and lesser energy consuming sugar effluent treatment technology that could be operated even by unskilled manpower. Treatment of sugar effluent using Spirulina platensis was explored. The treatment achieved significant reduction in chemical oxygen demand of the effluent i.e. >50 % in 96 h and 80–89 %s after 144–216 h. Further, 81–85 % removal of nitrogen, 45–65 % removal of phosphorous and 90–91 % removal in potassium was achieved. These observations claimed significant development in sugar effluent treatment technology.


Sugar mill effluent Chemical oxygen demand (COD) Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) Phyco-remediation Effluent treatment, Spirulina species 



The authors are thankful to Vasantdada Sugar Institute, Pune for funding the research activity.


  1. Beltran, F.J., J.F. Garcia-Araya, and P.M. Alvarez. 1999. Wine distillery wastewater degradation 2. Improvement of aerobic biodegradation by means of an integrated chemical (ozone)-biological treatment. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 47: 3919–3924.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Benemann, J.R. 1979. Production of nitrogen fertilizer with nitrogen-fixing blue-green algae. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 1: 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buvaneswari, S., S. Damodarkumar, and S. Murugesan. 2013. Bioremediation of sugar mill effluent using a bacteria Staphylococcus aureu. Advanced Bio Technology 12: 10–19.Google Scholar
  4. de-Bashan, L.E., and Y. Bashan. 2010. Immobilized microalgae for removing pollutants: review of practical aspects. Bioresource Technology 101: 1611–1627.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Doke, J., K. Raman, and V.S. Ghole. 2004. Treatment of anaerobically digested wastewater using Spirulina sp. International Journal on Algae 6(4): 383–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eaton, A.D., L.S. Clesceri, E.W. Rice and A.E. Greenberg (Eds.). 2005. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st Edition. American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA) and Water Environment Federation (WEF), Washington DC.Google Scholar
  7. Hampannavar, U.S., and C.B. Shivayogimath. 2010. Anaerobic treatment of sugar industry wastewater by Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor at ambient temperature. International Journal of Environmental Sciences 1: 631–639.Google Scholar
  8. Jodhi, C., and V.N. Kumar. 2007. Evaluation studies on aeration methods for treating sugar effluent in suspended-growth aerobic reactor. Nature, Environment and Pollution Technology 6: 481–484.Google Scholar
  9. Markou, G., and D. Georgakakis. 2011. Cultivation of filamentous cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) in agro-industrial wastes and wastewaters: A review. Applied Energy 88: 3389–3401. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.12.042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Olguín, E.J., H.W. Doelel, and G. Mercado. 1995. Resource recovery through recycling of sugar processing by-products and residuals. Resource Conservation and Recycle 15: 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Parkavi Kumar, S. Kuppusamy, H.M. Yusof, and S.I.S. Alwi. 2011. POME treatment using Spirulina Platensis Geitler. International Journal of Current Science 1: 11–13.Google Scholar
  12. Phang, S.M., M.S. Miah, B.G. Yeoh, and M.A. Hashim. 2000. Spirulina cultivation in digested sago starch factory wastewater. Journal of Applied Phycology 12: 395–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ramkrishan, K., M. Srirama Chandraskharan, P. Thamizhin Igan, and P.S. Maorthy. 2001. Effect of sugar mill effluent polluted soil on VAM fungi. Journal of Eco-biology B 3: 187–192.Google Scholar
  14. Upadhyay, R.N., V.C. Pandey, D.D. Tewari, S.C. Verma, and Kaveash Pandey. 2009. Study of the groundwater quality contaminated with sugar mill effluent. Nature, Environment and Pollution Technology 7: 249–252.Google Scholar
  15. Vonshak, A., and R. Guy. 1992. Photo-adaptation, photo-inhibition and productivity in the blue-green alga, Spirulina platensis grown outdoors. Plant, Cell and Environment 15: 613–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Westerman, P.W., and J.R. Bicudo. 2005. Management considerations for organic waste use in agriculture. Bioresource Technology 96: 215–221.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Sugar Research & Promotion 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amol Deshmane
    • 1
    Email author
  • Deepali Nimbalkar
    • 1
  • T. D. Nikam
    • 2
  • Vikram S. Ghole
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Environmental SciencesVasantdada Sugar InstitutePuneIndia
  2. 2.Department of BotanySavitribai Phule Pune UniversityPuneIndia
  3. 3.National Institute of Virology (NIV)PuneIndia

Personalised recommendations