Sugar Tech

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 138–149 | Cite as

Soil Physical, Chemical and Biological Changes and Long Term Sustainability in Subtropical India Through Integration of Organic and Inorganic Nutrient Sources in Sugarcane

  • S. K. Shukla
  • P. N. Singh
  • R. S. Chauhan
  • S. Solomon
Research Article

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2007–2010 at Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow to assess the magnitude of changes in soil physical, chemical and biological properties and crop yield with integration of FYM (organic) and inorganic fertilizer in sugarcane (plant-ratoon) system. Eight treatments of various inorganic and organic proportions were applied at the time of sugarcane planting and ratoon initiation in subsequent years. Application of 100 % N through organic showed lowest bulk density (1.30 Mg m−3) and highest infiltration rate (4.8 mm h−1). Soil organic carbon, nitrogen use efficiency and soil respiration rate improved with increasing proportion of organic with inorganic fertilizer. The higher soil microbial biomass carbon was analyzed at grand growth phase (August) of sugarcane crop as compared to tillering and maturity. Soil microbial biomass nitrogen increased with advancement in crop growth stages and the highest values were observed at maturity stage. Sugarcane yield increased with integration of organic and inorganic fertilizer and it showed long term sustainability in sugarcane based system.

Keywords

N uptake Soil microbial biomass carbon Soil microbial biomass nitrogen Respiration rate Sugarcane yield 

References

  1. Aoyama, M., D.A. Angers, and A.N. Dayegamiya. 1999a. Particulate and mineral associated organic matter in water stable aggregates as affected by mineral fertilizer and manure applications. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 79: 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aoyama, M., D.A. Angers, A.N. Dayegamiya, and N. Bissinate. 1999b. Protected organic matter in water stable aggregates as affected by mineral fertilizer and manure applications. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 79: 419–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barzegar, A., R. Youseti, and A. Daryashenas. 2002. The effect of addition of different amounts and types of organic materials on soil physical properties and yield of wheat. Plant and Soil 247: 295–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertrand, A. R. 1965. Rate of water intake in the field. In: Method of soil analysis, Part I American Society of Agronomy, ed. C.A. Black, 197–209. Madison, Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
  5. Blakemore, K., P.L. Searle, and B.K. Daly. 1972. In: Methods for the chemical analysis of soils. NZ Soil Bureau Report 10 A Government Printers, Wellington.Google Scholar
  6. Boehm, M.J., L.V. Madden, and H.A.J. Hoitink. 1993. Effect of organic matter decomposition level on bacterial species diversity and composition in relationship to Pythium damping off severity. Applied Environmental Microbiology 59: 4171–4179.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Boopathy, R., T. Beary, and P.J. Templet. 2001. Microbial decomposition of post harvest sugarcane residue. Bioresource Technology 79: 29–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell, C.A., Y.W. Jame, O.O. Akinremi, and M.L. Cabrera. 1995. Adapting the potentially mineralizable concept for the prediction of fertilizer N requirements. Fertilizer Research 42: 16–75.Google Scholar
  9. Dawe, D., A. Dobermann, J.K. Ladha, R.L. Yadav, Lin Bao, R.K. Gupta, P. Lal, G. Panaullah, O. Sariam, Y. Singh, A. Swarup, and Q.X. Zhen. 2003. Do organic amendments improve yield trends and profitability in intensive rice systems? Field Crops Research 83: 191–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dissanayake, N. 1996. Effects of organic wastes amendments, herbicides and weed hosts on Pythium root rot of sugarcane. Ph.D. Dissertation Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.Google Scholar
  11. Dissanayake, N., and J.W. Hoy. 1999. Organic material soil amendment effects on root rot and sugarcane growth and characterization of the materials. Plant Disease 83: 1039–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Doran, J.W., and T.B. Parkin. 1994. Defining and assessing soil quality. Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment, ed. J.W. Doran et al., 3–21. SSSA Special Publication 35. Madison, WI: SSSA and ASA.Google Scholar
  13. Eghball, B., I.N. Mielke, D.L. McCallister, and J.W. Doran. 1994. Distribution of organic carbon and inorganic nitrogen in a soil under various tillage and crop sequences. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 49: 201–205.Google Scholar
  14. F.A.O. 2007. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, FAOSTAT@fao.org.Google Scholar
  15. Freed, R., S.P. Eisensmith, S. Goetz, D. Reicosky, V.W. Smail, and P. Wolberg. 1991. In User’s guide to MSTAT-C: A software program for the design, management and analysis of agronomic research experiments. East Lasing, MI: Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  16. Gelsomino, A., L. Badalucco, L. Landi, and G. Cacco. 2006. Soil carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics as affected by soil solarization alone or combined with organic amendment. Plant and Soil 279: 307–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gershuny, G., and D.L. Martin. 1992. In: The Rodale book of composting (Ed). Rodale Press Emmaus, PA.Google Scholar
  18. Goncalves, J.L., and J.C. Carlyle. 1994. Modelling the influence of moisture and temperature on net nitrogen mineralization in a forested sandy soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 26: 1557–1564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Havlin, J.L., D.E. Kissel, D. Maddux, M.M. Classen, and J.H. Long. 1990. Crop rotation and tillage effects on soil organic carbon and nitrogen. Soil Science Society of America Journal 54: 448–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Helton, T.J. 2004. Effects of composted dairy manure on soil chemical properties and forage yield and nutritive value of Coastal Bermuda grass (Cyanodon dactylon). M.S. thesis, Texas A &M. Univ. College Station.Google Scholar
  21. ISMA. 2012. Area and production of sugarcane in different states of India. Indian Sugar 53: 87–89.Google Scholar
  22. Jackson, M.L. 1973. In: Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India Pvt, LTD.Google Scholar
  23. Jenkinson, D.S., and D.S. Powlson. 1976. The effect of biocidal treatment on metabolism in soil: I Fumigation with chloroform. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 8: 167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jeyabal, A., and G. Kuppuswamy. 2003. Recycling of organic wastes for the production of vermicompost and its response in rice- legume cropping system and soil fertility. European Journal of Agronomy 15: 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kennedy, I.R., A.T.M.A. Chowdhury, and M.L. Kecskes. 2004. Non-Symbiotic bacterial diazotrophs in crop farming systems: Can their potential for plant growth promotion be better exploited. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 36: 1229–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ma, B.L., L.M. Dwyer, and E.G. Gregorich. 1999. Soil nitrogen amendments effects on nitrogen uptake and grain yield of maize. Agronomy Journal 91: 650–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marschner, H., 1995. In Mineral nutrition of higher plants. 2nd edn. London: Academic Press, 889 pp.Google Scholar
  28. Materechera, S.A., and G.R. Mehuys. 1991. Organic manure additions and the leaf water potential and yield of barley. Plant and Soil 138: 239–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meady, G. P., and G. C. P. Chen, 1997. In: Cane sugar handbook. Edn 10 882-5, 882–885. New York: Willey.Google Scholar
  30. Muchow, R.C., M.J. Robertson, A.W. Wood, and B.A. Keating. 1996. Effect of nitrogen on the term course of sucrose accumulation in sugarcane. Field Crops Research 47: 143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oaks, A. 1992. A re-evaluation of nitrogen assimilation in roots. BioScience 42: 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Paroda, R.S. 2000. International conference on managing Natural Resources for sustainable agricultural production in 21st century February 14–18, 2000, New Delhi. Chairman’s Address February 14, 2000. p. 2.Google Scholar
  33. Patra, D.D., M. Ram, and D.V. Singh. 1993. Influence of straw mulching on fertilizer nitrogen use efficiency, moisture conservation and herb and essential oil yield of Japanese Mint. Fertilizer Research 34: 135–139. doi: 10.1007/BF00750108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pierzynski, G.M., and T.L. Logan. 1993. Crop soil and management effects on phosphorus soil test levels. Journal of Production Agriculture 6: 513–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rice, C.W., and J.S. Angle. 2004. A role for genetically modified organisms in soil carbon sequestration. In Application of biotechnology to mitigation of green house warming, ed. N. J. Rosenberg et al., pp 61–78. Proceedings of St. Michaels Workshop, St. Michaels, M.D. 13–15, Apr 2003. Batelle Press, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
  36. Robinson, C.A., R.M. Cruse, and K.A. Kohler. 1994. Soil management. In Sustainable agricultural systems, ed. J.L. Hatfield, and D.L. Karlen, 109–134. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publ.Google Scholar
  37. Rochette, P., and E.G. Gregorich. 1998. Dynamics of soil microbial biomass C, soluble organic C, and CO2 evolution after three years of manure applications. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 78: 283–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rose, D.A. 1991. The effect of long continued organic manuring on some physical properties of soils. In Advances in Soil organic matter research Special publication no. 90, ed. W.S. Wilson, 197–205. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.Google Scholar
  39. Schjonning, P., B.T. Christensen, and B. Christensen. 1994. Physical and chemical properties of a sandy loam receiving animal manure, mineral fertilizer or no fertilizer for 90 years. European Journal of Soil Science 45: 257–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Singh, P. 2002. The Hindu: Survey of Indian Agriculture, 15–21.Google Scholar
  41. Singh, M., and R.M. Sharma. 1991. Microbial population and decomposition of sugarcane trash at different relative humilities. Journal of Indian Society of Soil Science 39: 189–190.Google Scholar
  42. Sinha, M.K., D.P. Sinha, and H. Sinha. 1977. Organic matter transformations in soil. V. Kinetics of carbon and nitrogen mineralization in soils amended with different organic materials. Plant and Soil 46: 579–590. doi: 10.1007/BF00015917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sparling, G. P., L. A. Schipper, M. McLeod, L. Basher, and W. Rijkse. 1998. Trialing soil quality indicators for state of the environment monitoring: Research report 1997/1998. Unpublished Landcare Research Contract Report LC9798/141 for the Sustainable Management Fund, Ministry for the Environment Project 5001. Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  44. Tanner, P.D., and L. Mugwira. 1984. Effectiveness of communal area manures as sources of nutrients for young maize plants. Zimbabwean Agriculture Journal 81: 31–35.Google Scholar
  45. Weil, R.R., and W. Krontje. 1979. Physical condition of a Davidson clay loam after five years of heavy poultry manure applications. Journal of Environment and Quality 8: 387–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Sugar Research & Promotion 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. K. Shukla
    • 1
  • P. N. Singh
    • 1
  • R. S. Chauhan
    • 1
  • S. Solomon
    • 1
  1. 1.Indian Institute of Sugarcane ResearchLucknowIndia

Personalised recommendations