Sugar Tech

, Volume 12, Issue 3–4, pp 288–293 | Cite as

Sugar Beet as an Energy Crop

Review Article


The combination of volatility in the oil market and finite oil resources and the effect on global climate change from the addition of CO2 to the atmosphere as a result of burning fossil fuels has increased the interest in sustainable energy generation from renewable biofuels. Most 1st generation biofuels in current production are liquid with bioethanol the product of fermentation. Sugar beet provides an abundance of sucrose, which is easily fermented by many microbes and on a per hectare basis; sugar beet is one of the most efficient sources of ethanol, however storage of harvested roots is problematic. Most studies have indicated sustainable biofuels have reduced greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) when compared to petroleum based fuels. Bioethanol from sugar beet reduces GHG comparably or superiorly to maize or sugarcane. There also are other biofuels from fermentation, including biomethanol, biobutanol ETBE, biomethane, and biohydrogen, many of which are more energy dense than ethanol. Storage of sugar beet is a problem that could be solved by ensilage and anaerobic digestion producing a biogas, which could yield more energy per hectare than bioethanol. As the global economy moves away from fossil fuels, sugar beet will play an increasing role in the adoption of more sustainable energy generation.


Beta vulgaris Feedstock Renewable energy Biofuel Sustainable energy 


  1. Antoni, D., V. Zverlov, and W. Schwarz. 2007. Biofuels from microbes. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 77: 23–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balat, M., and H. Balat. 2009. Recent trends in global production and utilization of bio-ethanol fuel. Applied Energy 86: 2273–2282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balat, M., H. Balat, and C. Öz. 2008. Progress in bioethanol processing. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 34: 551–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biofuels Platform 2008. Production of biofuels in the world in 2007. Biofuels Platform-Production of biofuels in the world. Accessed 10 Jan 2011
  5. Bram, S., J. De Ruyck, and D. Lavric. 2009. Using biomass: A system perturbation analysis. Applied Energy 86: 194–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, L.R. 2009. Plan B 4.0 mobilizing to save civilization. New York, NY: W.W. Norton and Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, J.E., D.B. Lobell, R.C. Genova, and C.B. Field. 2008. The global potential of bioenergy on abandoned agriculture lands. Environmental Science and Technology 42: 5791–5794.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cassman, K.G., and A.J. Liska. 2007. Food and fuel for all: Realistic or foolish? Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining 1: 18–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Vries, S.C., G.W.J. van de Ven, M.K. van Ittersum, and K.E. Giller. 2010. Resource use efficiency and environmental performance of nine major biofuel crops, processed by first-generation conversion techniques. Biomass and Bioenergy 34: 588–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Wit, M., and A. Faaij. 2010. European biomass resource potential and costs. Biomass and Bioenergy 34: 188–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Wit, M., M. Junginger, S. Lensink, M. Londo, and A. Faaij. 2010. Competition between biofuels: Modeling technological learning and cost reductions over time. Biomass and Bioenergy 34: 203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Demirbas, A. 2009. Political, economic and environmental impacts of biofuels: A review. Applied Energy 86: S108–S117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dodic, S., S. Popov, J. Dodic, J. Rankovic, Z. Zavargo, and R. Jevtic Mucibabic. 2009. Bioethanol production from thick juice as intermediate of sugar beet processing. Biomass and Bioenergy 33: 822–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Doney, D.L., and J.C. Theurer. 1984. Potential of breeding for ethanol fuel in sugar beet. Crop Science 24: 255–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eggleston, G. 2008. Sugar and related oligosaccharides. In Glycoscience, ed. B. Fraser-Reid, and T.K. Thiem, 1164–1183. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  16. FAO. 2008. The state of food and agriculture. Biofuels: Prospects, risks and opportunities. Rome, Italy: FAO Electronic Publishing Policy and Support Branch Communications Division. Accessed 10 Jan 2011.
  17. Gerbens-Leenes, W., A.Y. Hoekstra, and T.H. van der Meer. 2009. The water footprint of bioenergy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 106: 10219–10223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goldemberg, J., and P. Guardabassi. 2009. Are biofuels a feasible option? Energy Policy 37: 10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Halleux, H., S. Lassaux, R. Renzoni, and A. Germain. 2008. Comparative life cycle assessment of two biofuels ethanol from sugar beet and rapeseed methyl ester. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13: 184–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harland, J.I., C.K. Jones, and C. Hufford. 2006. Co-products. In Sugar beet, ed. A.P. Draycott, 443–463. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing, Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hatano, K.I., S. Kikuchi, Y. Nakamura, H. Sakamoto, M. Takigami, and Y. Kojima. 2009. Novel strategy using an adsorbent-column chromatography for effective ethanol production from sugarcane or sugar beet molasses. Bioresource Technology 100: 4697–4703.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Henke, J.M., G. Klepper, and N. Schmitz. 2005. Tax exemption for biofuels in Germany: Is bio-ethanol really an option for climate policy? Energy 30: 2617–2635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoffman, C.M. 2008. Bioenergy from sugar beet—physiological aspects of yield formation. Proceedings of the International Institute of Beet Research, 71st Congress 13–14 Feb 2008, Brussels, Belgium, pp 117–124.Google Scholar
  24. Hoffmann, C.M., T. Huijbregts, N. van Swaaij, and R. Jansen. 2009. Impact of different environments in Europe on yield and quality of sugar beet genotypes. European Journal of Agronomy 30: 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoogeveen, J., J.-M. Faurès, and N. van de Giessen. 2009. Increased biofuel production in the coming decade: To what extent will it affect global freshwater resources? Irrigation and Drainage 58: S160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Içöz, E., K.M. Tugrul, A. Saral, and E. Içöz. 2009. Research on ethanol production and use from sugar beet in Turkey. Biomass and Bioenergy 33: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jacobs, J. 2006. Ethanol from sugar: What are the prospects for U.S. sugar co-ops? p. 5.
  28. Kaffka, S.R. 2009. Fertilizer N effects on yield and root quality for high-yielding, fall-planted sugar beets in the Imperial Valley, 37. Denver, CO: ASSBT.Google Scholar
  29. Kaffka, S.R. 2010. Can feedstock production for biofuels be sustainable in California? California Agriculture 63: 202–207.Google Scholar
  30. Kaltschmitt, M., G.A. Reinhardt, and T. Stelzer. 1997. Life cycle analysis of biofuels under different environmental aspects. Biomass and Bioenergy 12: 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kim, H., S. Kim, and B.E. Dale. 2009. Biofuels, land use change, and greenhouse gas emissions: Some unexplored variables. Environmental Science and Technology 43: 961–967.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Klocke, M., P. Mahnert, K. Mundt, K. Souidi, and B. Linke. 2007. Microbial community analysis of a biogas-producing completely stirred tank reactor fed continuously with fodder beet silage as mono-substrate. Systematic and Applied Microbiology 30: 139–151.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Koga, N. 2008. An energy balance under a conventional crop rotation system in northern Japan: Perspectives on fuel ethanol production from sugar beet. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 125: 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Koga, N., H. Takahshi, K. Okazaki, T. Kajiyama, and S. Kobayashi. 2009. Potential agronomic options for energy-efficient sugar beet-based bioethanol production in northern Japan. Global Change Biology and Bioenergy 1: 220–229.Google Scholar
  35. Kondili, E.M., and J.K. Kaldellis. 2007. Biofuel implementation in east Europe: Current status and future prospects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 11: 2137–2151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kozak, R., and C.S. Laufer. 2009. Addition of a thermostabilized pectin methylesterase significantly enhances the rate of saccharification of sugar beet pulp by the commercial pectinase preparation Pectinex ® Ultra SPL, Journal of Sugar Beet Research 46: 71–72 (abstract).Google Scholar
  37. Krajnc, D., M. Mele, and P. Glavic. 2007. Improving the economic and environmental performances of the beet sugar industry in Slovenia: Increasing fuel efficiency and using by-products for ethanol. Journal of Cleaner Production 15: 1240–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kretschmer, B., D. Narita, and S. Peterson. 2009. The economic effects of the EU biofuel target. Energy Economics 31: S285–S294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Larson, E.D. 2006. A review of life-cycle analysis studies on liquid biofuel systems for the transport sector. Energy for Sustainable Development 10: 109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McGinnis, R.A. 1982. Beet-sugar technology. Fort Collins, CO: Beet Sugar Development Foundation.Google Scholar
  41. Menichetti, E., and M. Otto. 2009. Energy balance and greenhouse gas emissions of biofuels from a life-cycle perspective. In: Biofuels: Environmental consequences and interactions with changing land use, eds. R.W. Howarth and S. Bringezu, 81–109. Proceedings of the Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment (SCOPE) International Biofuels Project Rapid Assessment, 22–25 Sept 2008, Gummersbach, Germany. ( Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
  42. Merkes, R. 1996. Considerations on the emission of CO2 in the production of sugar beet. Zuckerindustrie 121: 631–634.Google Scholar
  43. Morillo-Velarde, R., and E.S. Ober. 2006. Water use and irrigation. In Sugar beet, ed. A.P. Draycott, 221–255. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Morillo-Velarde, R., L. Cavazza, M. Cariolle, and R. Beckers. 2001. Irrigation de la betterave scurière en zone méditerranéenne. Advances in Sugar Beet Research, vol. 3. Brussels, Belgium: IIRB.Google Scholar
  45. Naylor, R.L., A.J. Liska, M.B. Burke, et al. 2007. The ripple effect: Biofuels, food security, and the environment. Environment 49: 30–43.Google Scholar
  46. Nigam, P.S., and A. Singh. 2010. Production of liquid biofuels from renewable resources. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2010.01.003.
  47. Panella, L., and S.R. Kaffka. 2010. Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L) as a biofuel feedstock in the United States. In Sustainability of the sugar and sugar-ethanol industries, ed. G. Eggleston, 163–175. American Chemical Society Symposium Series. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Power, N., J.D. Murphy, and E. McKeogh. 2008. What crop rotation will provide optimal first-generation ethanol production in Ireland, from technical and economic perspectives? Renewable Energy 33: 1444–1454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rankovic, J., J. Dodic, S. Dodic, and S. Popov. 2010. Bioethanol production from intermediate products of sugar beet processing with different types of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Chemical Industry and Chemical Engineering Quarterly 15: 13–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sachs, J., R. Remans, S. Smukler, et al. 2010. Monitoring the world’s agriculture. Nature 466: 558–560.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sanderson, K. 2006. US biofuels: A field in ferment. Nature 444: 673–676.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schmer, M.R., K.P. Vogel, R.B. Mitchell, and R.K. Perrin. 2008. Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 105: 464–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Scott, R.K., and K.W. Jaggard. 1993. Crop physiology and agronomy. In The sugar beet crop: Science into practice, ed. D.A. Cooke, 179–237. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  54. Searchinger, T., R. Heimlich, R.A. Houghton, et al. 2008. Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319: 1238–1240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shapouri, H., M. Salassi, and J.N. Fairbanks. 2006. The economic feasibility of ethanol production from sugar in the United States. Joint publication of OEPNU, OCE, USDA, and LSU. Accessed 10 Jan 2011.
  56. Silva Lora, E.E., et al. 2010. Issues to consider, existing tools and constraints in biofuels sustainability assessments. Energy. doi:10.1016/
  57. Smeets, E.M.W., L.F. Bouwman, E. Stehfest, D.P. van Vuuren, and A. Posthuma. 2009. Contribution of N2O to the greenhouse gas balance of first-generation biofuels. Global Change Biology 15: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Srivastava, H.M., V.K. Sharma, and Y. Bhargava. 2008. Genetic potential of sugar beet genotypes for ethanol production under different agro-climatic conditions of India. Proceedings of the International Institute of Beet Research, 71st Congress 13–14 Feb 2008, Brussels, Belgium, 305–311.Google Scholar
  59. Sutton, M.D., and J.B. Doran Peterson. 2001. Fermentation of sugar beet pulp for ethanol production using bioengineered Klebsiella oxytoca strain P2. Journal of Sugar Beet Research 38: 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tao, L., and A. Aden. 2009. The economics of current and future biofuels. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology Plant 45: 199–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Taylor, R.D., and W.W. Koo. 2010. Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emission Regulations on the U.S. Sugar Industry. Agribusiness and Applied Economics Report no. 93027, pp. 1–14. North Dakota State University: Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics. Accessed 10 Jan 2011.
  62. Theurer, J.C., D.L. Doney, G.A. Smith, et al. 1987. Potential ethanol production from sugar beet and fodder beet. Crop Science 27: 1034–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tian, Y., L. Zhao, H. Meng, L. Sun, and J. Yan. 2009. Estimation of un-used land potential for biofuels development in (the) People’s Republic of China. Applied Energy 86: S77–S85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Turley, D.B. 2008. The chemical value of biomass. In Introduction to chemicals from biomass, ed. J.H. Clark, and F.E.I. Deswarte, 21–46. Sussex, UK: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tzilivakis, J., D.J. Warner, M. May, K.A. Lewis, and K. Jaggard. 2005. An assessment of the energy inputs and greenhouse gas emissions in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) production in the UK. Agricultural Systems 85: 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. US EPA. 2007. Renewable Fuel Standard Program Regulatory Impact Analysis. EPA420-R-07-004 Accessed 10 Jan 2011.
  67. USDA-ERS. 2010. Home/briefing rooms/sugar and sweeteners/recommended data, Table 14 Accessed 10 Jan 2011.
  68. van Beilen, J.B. 2008. Transgenic plant factories for the production of biopolymers and platform chemicals. Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining 2: 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. von Felde, A. 2008. Trends and developments in energy plant breeding—special features of sugarbeet. Zuckerindustrie 133: 342–345.Google Scholar
  70. Weiland, P. 2003. Production and energetic use of biogas from energy crops and wastes in Germany. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 109: 263–274.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Young, A. 2009. Finding the balance between food and biofuels. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 16: 117–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhang, Y.-H.P., B.R. Evans, J.R. Mielenz, R.C. Hopkins, and M.W.W. Adams. 2007. High-yield hydrogen production from starch and water by a synthetic enzymatic pathway. PLoS ONE 2: e456.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Sugar Research & Promotion 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sugarbeet Research Unit, Crops Research LaboratoryUSDA-ARS, NPAFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations