Agricultural practices in relation to yield and quality of sugar beet: Yield and yield components
- 118 Downloads
- 1 Citations
Abstract
The root number/feddan of the two seasons sown with planter showed distinct advantage compared to the manual sowing. The narrower the ridge space (15 cm) the higher, the root numbers/fed. (30716 and 31175 in both seasons, respectively). The differences between soaking treatments with respect to their effect on root number/feddan were not significance in the second seasons. Sowing sugar beet mechanically attained additional increment in root yield over those under the traditional method (sowing manually) amounted by 8.52 % and 25.08 % in the 1st and 2nd seasons, respectively. Soaking sugar beet seeds befor sowing significantly surpassed the dried method with respect to root yield. There was a positive response in the values of root yield due to ridge space from 15 cm to 20 cm produced on increment in root yield amounted by 4.79 % in the 1st season corresponding 4.94 % in the 2nd season. There was no clear cut trend due to the effect of sowing method on richness per cent. The values of richness per cent reflected an opposite response in the two seasons, where the narrow ridge space (15 cm) recorded the higher values of this trait in the first season. On the contrary the wider ridge space (20 cm) attained the highest value of this trait in the 2nd season. Sowing sugar beet seeds by using soaked seeds attained relative increments in richness per cent in the 1st season. On the contrary, sowing sugar beet seeds using the dried seeds in the 2nd season appeared significant increase in this trait. There are general tendencies toward increasing the sugar yield/fed by using planter technique for sowing sugar beet seeds. The wider, ridge space (20 cm), gave the higher sugar yield/fed (4.19 and 4.14 ton/fed.). Sowing sugar beet crop by the soaked seeds attained and significant increase in sugar yield in the 2nd season.
Key words
Sugar beet agriculture practices yield qualityPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Abd-EL-Kader, EL MA M (2005) Effect of some Agricultural practicis on sugar beet tolerance to salinity B.Sc. Thesis in Agron Fac of Agrice AL- Azhar UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Attia AN, T El-Kassaby A, Badawi MA, El - Sead S (1999) Yield, yield components and quality of sugar beet as affected by growth regulator, nitrogen fertilazition and foliar nutrition treatments. First international conference on sugar and integrated industries Luxor, Egypt (1): 235–256.Google Scholar
- Awad NMM (2000) Effect of mechanical planting on production of sugar beet yield. Ph. D. thesis, Fac of Agric Kafr EI- Sheikh Tanta Univ.Google Scholar
- Cormack WF, Jarvis PJ, Ecclestone PMJ, Hopkins A (2004) Seed spacing and treatment for organically grown sugar beet. Organic farming scienc and practice for profitable leves tock cropping- proceedings of the BGS AAB COR conference Newport, Shropshire, UK 20–22-April 2004, 208–211.Google Scholar
- Dawwam HA, Rody MS, BD- Alla AAA (2000) Studies on some factors affecting the produtivity of sugar beet proc. 9th conf. Agron Minufiy a Univ 1–2 Sept. 2000: 583–600.Google Scholar
- El-Kassaby, AT, Attia AN, Badawi MA, El-Sead S (1999) Effect of growth regulator, nitrogen fertillzation and foliar nutrition treatments: I growth attributes of sugar beet. First international conference on Sugar and Integrated Industries Luxor, Egypt. vol. 1: 123–139.Google Scholar
- Gladkove AT, Zolotove LN (1966) Effect of trace- elements treatments of sugar beet before sowing. Khiniya sel,khoz 4(10) 11–130Google Scholar
- Gobarh Mirvat EM (1993) Effect of nitrogen fertilization and plant density on yield and quality of some sugar beet varieties. Ph. D Thesis, Fac Agric Cairo Univ Egypt.Google Scholar
- Ibraheim YY (1997) Effect of plant population on yield and quality of sugar beet. Magazine of Egyptian sugar society technologist: 31, 109–121 Conference.Google Scholar
- Le Clerg L, Leonard WH, Clark GA (1966) Field plot techniquue Burgess pub. Comp. Minnesota, USA pp 1–373.Google Scholar
- Mady MA (1997) Mechanization of some operiations for sugar beet production. Misr J Ag Eng 18(2): 339–355.Google Scholar
- Mohamed El K (1993) Physiological studies on sugar beet (Beta- vulgaris l.) M.Sc Thesis in Agrono Fac of Agric Al-Azhar University.Google Scholar
- Nassar A M (2001) Effect of plant density on the productivity of some sugar beet varieties. J Agric Sci Mansoura Univ 26(12): 7533–7546.Google Scholar
- Shafi M, Manan- A, Ahmad B, Khan S, Hassan SW, Aman K (1993) Effect of seed treatment on emergence, growth, yield and yield componts of sugar beet sarhad journal of Agriculture, 9:(1) 11–14.Google Scholar
- Shafi M, Khan K (1992) Effect of seed treatment and ridged and flat planting on the groweth and yield of sugar beet, sarhad Journal of Agriculture 8(1): 11–15Google Scholar
- Smith JA, Yots CD, Wilson RG, G.Robb J, Kerr ED (1998) Transplanted sugar beet yield response In- row spacing. Trans of the ASAE, 31(5): 1322–1325. (C.F.CD Rom computer system).Google Scholar
- Snedecor Chocran (1981). statistical methods, 6th Edlowa State Univ Press Amessi Iowa, USAGoogle Scholar
- Sorour SR, Abou-Khadrah SH, Zahran M, Neamet-Alla EAY (1995) Effect of different potassium and nitrogen rates on growth and yield of some sugar beet cultivars. Proc. 5111 Confrans Zagzig 13–15 Sept. (2):1027–1043.Google Scholar
- Taieb AZ (1990) The demands and constraints of energy utilization in sugar beet crop production, Ph. D. Thesis (Agr. Eng.) Cairo Univ., EgyptGoogle Scholar
- Taieb AZ (1997) Comparative study on manual and mechanical sugar beet planting in the newly reclaimed lands. Misr J Ag Eng 14(3): 299–309.Google Scholar
- Tawfik SF (1994) Effect of some fertilization tretments and plant density on yield of sugar beet M. Sc. Thesis Fac Aric Moshtohor (Banha Branch) Egypt.Google Scholar
- Waller RA, Duncan DB (1969) A bays rula for the symmetric multipa compariso problem Amer. State Assoc J Dec: 1485–1503.Google Scholar