Advertisement

Spatial visualization on patterns of disaggregate robberies

  • Thyago Celso C. NepomucenoEmail author
  • Ana Paula Cabral Seixas Costa
Original paper
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

The problem of aggregating large samples of criminal data in visual representations, as often observed in many studies using geographic information systems and optimization tools to perform social assessments and design spatial patterns, is discussed in this work. A compensation bias in the correlation measure of the spatial association can be found in such types of big data aggregations, which may jeopardize the entire analysis and the conclusions from the results. In this work, a big dataset of robbery incidents recorded from the years 2013 through 2016 in Recife, one of the most important Brazilian capitals, is decomposed into nine small sets of specific robberies, namely, larceny, armed robbery, group stealing, motor vehicles thefts, burglary, commercial burglary, saidinha de banco (saucy bank), motor vehicle robbery (carjacking) and arrastão (flash robbery). More accurate measures for the spatial autocorrelation can be derived from the individual incidences as proposed in this work. The visualization of optimized hot spots and cold spots of crime based on these autocorrelation measures besides enable rapid actions where crime concentrates, they have the property to design spatial patterns that can be associated with environmental, social and economic factors to support more efficient decision making on the allocation of public safety resources.

Keywords

Criminal behavior Spatial analysis Geographic information system (GIS) Data visualization Data disaggregation Optimized hot spots 

Notes

Funding

Funding was provided by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).

References

  1. Alba RD, Logan JR, Bellair PE (1994) Living with crime: the implications of racial/ethnic differences in suburban location. Soc Forces 73(2):395–434Google Scholar
  2. Andreoni V, Galmarini S (2016) Mapping socioeconomic well-being across EU regions. Int J Soc Econ 43(3):226–243Google Scholar
  3. Andresen MA (2013) Unemployment, business cycles, crime, and the Canadian provinces. J Crim Justice 41(4):220–227Google Scholar
  4. Andresen MA, Linning SJ (2012) The (in)appropriateness of aggregating across crime types. Appl Geogr 35:275–282Google Scholar
  5. Andresen MA, Malleson N (2011) Testing the stability of crime patterns: implications for theory and policy. J Res Crime Delinq 48:58–82Google Scholar
  6. Andresen MA, Curman AS, Linning SJ (2017a) The trajectories of crime at places: understanding the patterns of disaggregated crime types. J Quant Criminol 33(3):427–449Google Scholar
  7. Andresen MA, Linning SJ, Malleson N (2017b) Crime at places and spatial concentrations: exploring the spatial stability of property crime in Vancouver BC, 2003–2013. J Quant Criminol 33(2):255–275Google Scholar
  8. Arabatzis S, Manos B (2005) An integrated system for water resources monitoring, economic evaluation and management. Oper Res Int J 5(1):193–208Google Scholar
  9. Bernasco W, Elffers H (2010) Statistical analysis of spatial crime data. In: Piquero AR, Weisburd D (eds) Handbook of quantitative criminology. Springer, New York, pp 699–724.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77650-7_33 Google Scholar
  10. Berry JK, Sailor JK (1987) Use of a geographic information system for storm runoff prediction from small urban watersheds. Environ Manag 11(1):21–27Google Scholar
  11. Bimonte S, Pradel M, Boffety D, Tailleur A, André G, Bzikha R, Chanet JP (2013) A New sensor-based spatial OLAP architecture centered on an agricultural farm energy-use diagnosis tool. Int J Decis Support Syst Technol (IJDSST) 5(4):1–20Google Scholar
  12. Boman A (2007) Does migration pay? Earnings effects from geographic mobility following job displacement. rapport nr.: Working papers in Economics 244Google Scholar
  13. Braga A, Hureau DM, Papachristos AV (2010) The concentration and stability of gun violence at micro places in Boston, 1980–2008. J Quant Criminol 26:33–53Google Scholar
  14. Braga A, Hureau DM, Papachristos AV (2011) The relevance of micro places to citywide robbery trends: a longitudinal analysis of robbery incidents at street corners and block faces in Boston. J Res Crime Delinq 48:7–32Google Scholar
  15. Buccella A, Cechich A, Gendarmi D, Lanubile F, Semeraro G, Colagrossi A (2010) GeoMergeP: geographic information integration through enriched ontology matching. New Generation Computing 28(1):41–71Google Scholar
  16. Burrough PA (1986) Principles of geographical information systems for land resources assessment. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Caldas de Castro M, Singer BH (2006) Controlling the false discovery rate: a new application to account for multiple and dependent test in local statistics of spatial association. Geogr Anal 38:180–208Google Scholar
  18. Čerba O, Jedlička K, Čada V, Charvát K (2017) Centrality as a method for the evaluation of semantic resources for disaster risk reduction. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 6(8):237Google Scholar
  19. Chainey S, Ratcliffe J (2013) GIS and crime mapping. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Chainey S, Tompson L, Uhlig S (2008) The utility of hotspot mapping for predicting spatial patterns of crime. Secur J 21(1–2):4–28Google Scholar
  21. Cohen J, Gorr WL (2005) Development of crime forecasting and mapping systems for use by police in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and Rochester, New York, 1990–2001. ICPSR04545-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2006-08-31.  https://doi.org/10.3886/icpsr04545.v1
  22. Daudelin J, Ratton JL (2017) Mercados de drogas, guerra e paz no Recife. Tempo Social 29(2):115–133Google Scholar
  23. Fajnzylber P, Lederman D, Loayza N (2002) What causes violent crime? Eur Econ Rev 46(7):1323–1357Google Scholar
  24. Fatima-Zohra Y, Djamila H, Omar B (2015) A surveillance and spatiotemporal visualization model for infectious diseases using social network. Int J Decis Support Syst Technol (IJDSST) 7(4):1–19Google Scholar
  25. Figueiredo CJJD, Mota CMDM (2016). A classification model to evaluate the security level in a city based on GIS-MCDA. Math Problems Eng 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3534824
  26. Getis A, Ord JK (1992) The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geogr Anal 24(3):189–206Google Scholar
  27. Glaeser EL, Sacerdotev B (1999) Why is there more crime in cities? J Polit Econ 107(S6):S225–S258Google Scholar
  28. Gober-Meyers P (1978) Migration analysis: the role of geographic scale. Ann Reg Sci 12(3):52–61Google Scholar
  29. Hachikyan A, Scherer R, Angelova M, Lazarova M (2005) Decision support system for a river network pollution estimation based on a structural-linguistic data model. Oper Res Int J 5(1):105–113Google Scholar
  30. Hong SY, Sadahiro Y (2014) Measuring geographic segregation: a graph-based approach. J Geogr Syst 16(2):211–231Google Scholar
  31. Kaloudis ST, Lorentzos NA, Sideridis AB, Yialouris CP (2005) A decision support system for forest fire management. Oper Res Int J 5(1):141–152Google Scholar
  32. Kim MC, Zhu Y, Chen C (2016) How are they different? A quantitative domain comparison of information visualization and data visualization (2000–2014). Scientometrics 107(1):123–165Google Scholar
  33. Kirk KE, Haq MZ, Alam MS, Haque U (2014) Geospatial technology: a tool to aid in the elimination of malaria in Bangladesh. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 4(1):47–58Google Scholar
  34. Kursah MB (2017) Modelling malaria susceptibility using geographic information system. GeoJournal 82(6):1101–1111.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-016-9732-0 Google Scholar
  35. Lochner L (2004) Education, work, and crime: a human capital approach. Int Econ Rev 45(3):811–843Google Scholar
  36. Maguire DJ (1991) An overview and definition of GIS. In: Maguire DJ, Goodchild MF, Rhind DW (eds) Geographical information systems: principles and applications, vol 1. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 9–20Google Scholar
  37. Maltz M, Gordon AC, Friedman W (1991) Mapping crime in its community setting: event geography analysisGoogle Scholar
  38. Manfré LA, Hirata E, Silva JB, Shinohara EJ, Giannotti MA, Larocca APC, Quintanilha JA (2012) An analysis of geospatial technologies for risk and natural disaster management. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 1(2):166–185Google Scholar
  39. Melo SN, Matias LF, Andresen MA (2015) Crime concentrations and similarities in spatial crime patterns in a Brazilian context. Appl Geogr 62:314–324Google Scholar
  40. Menezes T, Silveira-Neto R, Monteiro C, Ratton JL (2013) Spatial correlation between homicide rates and inequality: evidence from urban neighborhoods. Econ Lett 120(1):97–99Google Scholar
  41. Moonen M, Cattrysse D, Van Oudheusden D (2008) Organising patrol deployment against violent crimes. Oper Res Int J 7(3):401–418Google Scholar
  42. Moran PAP (1950) Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37:17–23Google Scholar
  43. Nasar JL, Fisher B (1993) ‘Hot spots’ of fear and crime: a multi-method investigation. J Environ Psychol 13(3):187–206Google Scholar
  44. Nelson EP, Connors KA, Suárez C (2007) GIS-based slope stability analysis, Chuquicamata open pit copper mine, Chile. Nat Resour Res 16(2):171–190Google Scholar
  45. Nepomuceno TCC, de Moura JA, e Silva LC and Costa APCS (2017) Alcohol and violent behavior among football spectators: AN empirical assessment of Brazilian’s criminalization. Int J Law Crime Justice 51:34–44. ISSN 1756-0616. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2017.05.001
  46. Nikolopoulou AI, Repoussis PP, Tarantilis CD, Zachariadis EE (2019) Adaptive memory programming for the many-to-many vehicle routing problem with cross-docking. Oper Res Int J 19(1):1–38.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-016-0278-1 Google Scholar
  47. Oliveira W (2004) Arrombamentos de residências assustam moradores de Casa Amarela. Diário de Pernambuco. http://blogs.diariodepernambuco.com.br/segurancapublica/?p=7585. Accessed 31 Aug 2017
  48. Ord JK, Getis A (1995) Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: distributional issues and an application. Geogr Anal 27:286–306.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00912.x Google Scholar
  49. Pereira DV, Mota CM, Andresen MA (2015) Social disorganization and homicide in Recife, Brazil. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 1:2.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X15623282 Google Scholar
  50. Pereira DV, Mota CM, Andresen MA (2017) The homicide drop in Recife, Brazil: a study of crime concentrations and spatial patterns. Homicide Studes 21(1):21–38Google Scholar
  51. Power DJ, Roth RM, Karsten R (2013). Decision support for crisis incidents. Engineering effective decision support technologies: New Models and Applications: New Models and Applications, 149Google Scholar
  52. Rephann TJ (2009) Rental housing and crime: the role of property ownership and management. Ann Reg Sci 43(2):435–451Google Scholar
  53. Rodríguez-González A, Alor-Hernandez G, Mayer MA, Cortes-Robles G, Perez-Gallardo Y (2013) Application of probabilistic techniques for the development of a prognosis model of stroke using epidemiological studies. Int J Decis Support Syst Technol (IJDSST) 5(4):34–58Google Scholar
  54. Schröder W, Schmidt G, Bast H, Pesch R, Kiel E (2007) Pilot-study on GIS-based risk modelling of a climate warming induced tertian malaria outbreak in Lower Saxony (Germany). Environ Monit Assess 133(1):483–493Google Scholar
  55. Scorzafave LG, Soares MK (2009) Income inequality and pecuniary crimes. Econ Lett 104(1):40–42Google Scholar
  56. Sherman LW, Gartin P, Buerger ME (1989) Hot spots of predatory crime: routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology 27:27–55Google Scholar
  57. Spelman W (1993) Abandoned buildings: magnets for crime? J Crim Justice 21(5):481–495Google Scholar
  58. Sridharan S, Meyer J (2005) Exploratory spatial data approach to identify the context of unemployment-crime linkages in Virginia, 1995–2000. ICPSR04546-v1. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], Ann Arbor, MI, 2006-08-31.  https://doi.org/10.3886/icpsr04546.v1
  59. Subasinghe S, Estoque R, Murayama Y (2016) Spatiotemporal analysis of urban growth using GIS and remote sensing: a case study of the Colombo metropolitan area, Sri Lanka. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 5(11):197Google Scholar
  60. Tabangin DR, Flores JC, Emperador NF (2010) Investigating crime hotspot places and their implication to urban environmental design: a geographic visualization and data mining approach. Int J Hum Soc Sci 5(4):210–218Google Scholar
  61. Tarantilis CD, Kiranoudis CT (2001) Using the vehicle routing problem for the transportation of hazardous materials. Oper Res Int J 1(1):67–78Google Scholar
  62. Tatsiramos K (2009) Geographic labour mobility and unemployment insurance in Europe. J Popul Econ 22(2):267–283Google Scholar
  63. Thomas JJ, Cook KA (2005) Illuminating the path: the R&D agenda for visual analytics. Natl Visual Anal Center, USAGoogle Scholar
  64. Tlili T, Krichen S, Faiz S (2013) Towards a decision making support system for the capacitated vehicle routing problem. Int J Decis Support Syst Technol (IJDSST) 5(4):21–33Google Scholar
  65. Tseloni A, Thompson R (2015) Securing the premises. Significance 12(1):32–35Google Scholar
  66. Tufte E (1983) The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press, CheshireGoogle Scholar
  67. Tukey J (1977) Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley, BostonGoogle Scholar
  68. Webber D, Pacheco G (2016) Changes in intra-city employment patterns: a spatial analysis. Int J Soc Econ 43(3):263–283Google Scholar
  69. Weisburd D, Amram S (2014) The law of concentrations of crime at place: the case of Tel Aviv-Jaffa. Police Pract Res 15:101–114Google Scholar
  70. Weisburd D, Bushway S, Lum C, Yang S-M (2004) Trajectories of crime at places: a longitudinal study of street segments in the City of Seattle. Criminology 42:283–321Google Scholar
  71. Zachariadis EE, Tarantilis C, Kiranoudis CT (2017) Vehicle routing strategies for pick-up and delivery service under two dimensional loading constraints. Oper Res Int J 17(1):115–143Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Engenharia de ProduçãoUniversidade Federal de PernambucoRecifeBrazil
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Ingegneria Informatica Automatica e Gestionale Antonio RubertiSapienza University of RomeRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations