Effect of reduced photon count levels and choice of normal data on semi-automated image assessment in cardiac SPECT
- 17 Downloads
The SMARTZOOM multifocal collimator from Siemens Healthcare was developed to improve the γ-photon sensitivity in myocardial perfusion imaging without truncating the field of view. As part of the IQ-SPECT package, it may be used to reduce radiopharmaceutical dose to patients, as well as acquisition time. The aim of this study was twofold: (1) to evaluate the influence of dose reduction in semi-automated MPI scoring, with focus on different strategies for the choice of normal data (count-matched, full-count), and (2) to evaluate the effect of dose reduction afforded by Siemens’ IQ-SPECT package.
50 patients underwent Tc-99m-sestamibi one-day stress/rest SPECT/CT. Multiple levels of count reduction were generated using binomial thinning. Using Corridor 4DM, summed stress score (SSS) was calculated using either count-matched or full-count normal data. Studies were classified as low-risk (SSS < 4) or intermediate/high-risk (SSS ≥ 4).
Count reduction using count-matched normal data increases false-normal rate and decreases sensitivity. With full-count normal data, count reduction increases false-hypoperfusion rate, leading to decreased specificity. Altogether, rate of reclassification was significant at roughly 67% dose and below.
Significant bias results from count level of normal data relative to actual patient data. Compared to standard LEHR, IQ-SPECT should allow for significant dose reduction.
Key WordsMPI SPECT/CT Tc-99m MIBI dose reduction normal data
Myocardial perfusion imaging
Total perfusion deficit
Summed stress score
Summed rest score
Counts per pixel
The present work was performed in (partial) fulfillment of the requirements for obtaining the degree “Dr. med.”
Matthias Wetzl has nothing to declare. James C. Sanders has been supported in the past by a collaboration agreement with Siemens Molecular Imaging that is not directly related to this project. Torsten Kuwert has received honoraria for lectures on behalf of Siemens Molecular Imaging. Torsten Kuwert and Philipp Ritt: the Clinic of Nuclear Medicine in Erlangen has a research cooperation with Siemens on the field of SPECT/CT, but not related to the data contained in this manuscript.
- 2.Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Shaw LJ, Kiat H, Cohen I, Cabico JA, et al. Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998;97:535–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Vija AH, Malmin R, Yahil A, Zeintl J, Bhattacharya M, Rempel TD et al. A method for improving the efficiency of myocardial perfusion imaging using conventional SPECT and SPECT/CT imaging systems. In: Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC), 2010 IEEE; 2010. p. 3433-7.Google Scholar
- 15.Zeintl J, Rempel TD, Bhattacharya M, Malmin RE, Vija AH. Performance characteristics of the SMARTZOOM collimator. In: Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC), 2011 IEEE; 2011. p. 2426-9.Google Scholar
- 17.Pirich C, Keinrath P, Barth G, Rendl G, Rettenbacher L, Rodrigues M. Diagnostic accuracy and functional parameters of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy using accelerated cardiac acquisition with IQ SPECT technique in comparison to conventional imaging. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;61:102–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Novak M, Grancorvitz A, Johnson C. Comparison of IQ-SPECT/CT with conventional SPECT/CT for myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:2712.Google Scholar
- 22.Erwin W, Jessop A, Peirsol W, Mar M, Jones S, Macapinlac H, et al. Qualitative and quantitative comparison of gated blood pool SPECT using low-energy high-resolution and SMARTZOOM collimation. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:1736.Google Scholar
- 27.Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz. Bekanntmachung der aktualisierten diagnostischen Referenzwerte für nuklearmedizinische Untersuchungen [National Regulation]. Bundesanzeiger. 2012;19(10):2012.Google Scholar
- 39.Sharir T, Pinskiy M, Pardes A, Rochman A, Prokhorov V, Kovalski G, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracies of very low stress-dose with standard-dose myocardial perfusion imaging: Automated quantification of one-day, stress-first SPECT using a CZT camera. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016;23:11–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 42.Siemens Molecular Imaging. IQ-SPECT Hints and Tips Software Version VA60A [Manufacturer’s White Paper]; 2011.Google Scholar
- 43.Lindner O, Bengel F, Burchert W, Hacker M, Schäfer W, Schäfers M et al. DGN-Handlungsempfehlung (S1-Leitlinie): Myokard-Perfusions-Szintigraphie [National Guideline]; 2012.Google Scholar
- 44.Berman DS, Kang X, Van Train KF, Lewin HC, Cohen I, Areeda J, et al. Comparative prognostic value of automatic quantitative analysis versus semiquantitative visual analysis of exercise myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:1987–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 47.Meden J, Ficaro E, Corbett J. Clinical comparison of four minute IQ-SPECT imaging with conventional parallel hole collimated SPECT/CT. J Nucl Med Meeting Abstracts 2011;52:1132Google Scholar
- 49.Agostini D, Pineau S, Manrique A, Desmonts C. Assessment of myocardial perfusion and function by IQ-SPECT in comparison with LEHR-SPECT in patients suspected of coronary artery disease: Preliminary results. J Nucl Med Meeting Abstracts 2014;55:1717Google Scholar