ERRATUM TO: J NUCL CARDIOL DOI 10.1007/s12350-017-0866-3

Regrettably an error was introduced in Table 3 during the article’s production. The very first cell (row: Very low 0; column: Very low) should read ‘12’ and not ‘21’ as originally published. The corrected Table 3 appears below.

Table 3 Manual CAC scoring in CSCT vs (a) manual and (b) automatic CAC scoring in CTAC at rest