Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 36–43 | Cite as

Does perfusion pattern influence stress-induced changes in left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony on thallium-201-gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging?

  • Harmandeep Singh
  • Chetan D. PatelEmail author
  • Punit Sharma
  • Nitish Naik
  • Sandeep Singh
  • Rajiv Narang
Original Article



The relationship between perfusion pattern and stress-induced changes in left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony (LVMD) on stress-rest thallium-201-gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (Tl-201 SPECT MPI) is not clear. The aim of the study is to assess the relation of perfusion pattern with stress-induced changes in LVMD on Tl-201 MPI.


Data of 194 patients who underwent exercise-rest Tl-201 MPI between January to December 2012 at our institute was retrospectively evaluated. Institute Ethical committee approval was obtained. Fifty patients who underwent Tl-201 MPI for suspected CAD and had normal LV perfusion and function on MPI were taken as normal group. Patients with perfusion abnormalities (n = 144) were divided into three groups: ischemia (n = 66), infarct (n = 32), and mixed group (n = 46; ischemia and infarct both). Summed stress score, summed rest score, summed difference score (SDS), and LV ejection fraction (EF) were evaluated. Two LVMD parameters, phase standard deviation (PSD) and phase histogram bandwidth (PHB), were assessed in post-stress and rest MPI images. ΔPSD (post-stress PSD − rest PSD) and ΔPHB (post-stress PHB − rest PHB) were calculated to measure stress-induced changes in LVMD.


In all the groups, mean post-stress LVMD parameters were lower as compared to LVMD parameters at rest. Post-stress PSD was significantly lower than rest PSD in all groups. Similar trend was noted with PHB values also, but it was statistically significant in the normal and ischemia group only. Post-stress worsening of at least one of the LVMD parameters was noted in 28 patients and all these patients had perfusion abnormalities. But on subgroup analysis, no difference was found in proportion of patients showing post-stress worsening of LVMD between ischemia (13.6%), infarct (25%), and mixed (23.6%) groups. No significant correlation was found between ΔPSD/ΔPHB and ΔLVEF/SDS in any group.


LV mechanical dyssynchrony parameters are smaller in post-exercise stress as compared to rest on Tl-201 MPI, regardless of perfusion pattern. Stress-induced worsening of LV dyssynchrony was observed only in patients with perfusion abnormalities, but this is not related to the type of perfusion abnormality.


Thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging SPECT perfusion abnormality left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony 



Harmandeep Singh, Chetan D. Patel, Punit Sharma, Nitish Naik, Sandeep Singh, and Rajiv Narang declare that there is no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Leclercq C, Faris O, Tunin R, Johnson J, Kato R, Evans F, et al. Systolic improvement and mechanical resynchronization does not require electrical synchrony in the dilated failing heart with left bundle-branch block. Circulation 2002;106:1760-3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mollema SA, Bleeker GB, van der Wall EE, Schalij MJ, Bax JJ. Usefulness of QRS duration to predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with end-stage heart failure. Am J Cardiol 2007;100:1665-70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    AlJaroudi WA, Hage FG, Hermann D, Doppalapudi H, Venkataraman R, Heo J, et al. Relation of left-ventricular dyssynchrony by phase analysis of gated SPECT images and cardiovascular events in patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators. J Nucl Cardiol 2010;17:398-404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    AlJaroudi WA, Koneru J, Heo J, Iskandrian AE. Impact of ischemia on left ventricular dyssynchrony by phase analysis of gated single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2011;18:36-42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen CC, She TY, Chang MC, Hung GU, Chen WC, Kao CH, et al. Stress-induced myocardial ischemia is associated with early post-stress left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony as assessed by phase analysis of 201Tl gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2012;39:1904-9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Trimble MA, Velazquez EJ, Adams GL, Honeycutt EF, Pagnanelli RA, Barnhart HX, et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of phase analysis of gated single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging used to quantify cardiac dyssynchrony. Nucl Med Commun 2008;29:374-81.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen J, Garcia EV, Folks RD, Cooke CD, Faber TL, Tauxe EL, et al. Onset of left ventricular contraction determined by phase analysis of ECG-gated myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging: Development of a diagnostic tool for assessment of cardiac me-chanical dyssynchrony. J Nucl Cardiol 2005;6:687-95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Trimble MA, Borges-Neto S, Smallheiser S, Chen J, Honeycutt EF, Shaw LK, et al. Evaluation of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony as determined by phase analysis of ECG-gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and conduction disturbances. J Nucl Cardiol 2007;14:298-307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen J, Garcia EV, Bax JJ, Iskandrian AE, Borges-Neto S, Soman P. SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for the assessment of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony. J Nucl Cardiol 2011. doi: 10.1007/s12350-011-9392-x.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pazhenkottil AP, Buechel RR, Herzog BA, Nkoulou RN, Valenta I, Fehlmann U, et al. Ultrafast assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony from nuclear myo-cardial perfusion imaging on a new high-speed gamma camera. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010;37:2086-92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li D, Zhou Y, Feng J, Yuan D, Cao K, Garcia EV, et al. Impact of image reconstruction on phase analysis of ECG-gated myocardial perfusion SPECT studies. Nucl Med Commun 2009;30:700-5.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Henneman MM, Chen J, Ypenburg C, Dibbets-Schneider P, Stokkel MP, Bleeker GB, et al. Phase analysis of gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography compared with tissue Doppler imaging for the assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1708-14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen CC, Huang WS, Hung GU, Chen WC, Kao CH, Chen J. Left-ventricular dyssynchrony evaluated by Tl-201 gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: A comparison with Tc-99m sestamibi. Nucl Med Commun 2012. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e32835c91b9.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hida S, Chikamori T, Tanaka H, Igarashi Y, Shiba C, Usui Y, et al. Diagnostic value of left ventricular dyssynchrony after exercise and at rest in the detection of multivessel coronary artery disease on single-photon emission computed tomography. Circ J 2012;76:1942-52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Nuclear Cardiology 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harmandeep Singh
    • 1
  • Chetan D. Patel
    • 1
    Email author
  • Punit Sharma
    • 1
  • Nitish Naik
    • 2
  • Sandeep Singh
    • 2
  • Rajiv Narang
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Nuclear MedicineAll India Institute of Medical SciencesNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Department of CardiologyAll India Institute of Medical SciencesNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations