Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 958–969

Predictors and incremental prognostic value of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony response during stress-gated positron emission tomography in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy

  • Wael AlJaroudi
  • M. Chadi Alraies
  • Venu Menon
  • Richard C. Brunken
  • Manuel D. Cerqueira
  • Wael A. Jaber
Original Article



The study sought to investigate whether there is stress-induced worsening of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony (LVMD) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), determine the predictors of LVMD response (LVMDR) and its incremental prognostic value.


The effect of stress physiology on LVMD in patients with ICM has not been adequately evaluated, and the prognostic value of abnormal LVMDR beyond traditional predictors of mortality remains uncertain.


489 consecutive patients with ICM, LV ejection fraction (EF) <35% undergoing rest/stress Rb-82 gated PET were evaluated. LVMD was determined by phase analysis (SD) from gated rest and peak stress images; LVMDR was defined as stress SD − rest SD, and stratified by tertiles. All-cause mortality was the primary outcome. Linear regression was performed to determine the predictors of LVMDR, and Cox proportional hazard modeling to assess its independent prognostic value. Integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and net reclassification improvement (NRI) were performed to determine incremental value of abnormal LVMDR.


Independent predictors of worse LVMD at peak stress were perfusion defect size (PDS) and resting heart rate; while higher resting LVEF, LVEF reserve and rest phase SD were associated with lower LVMDR. Over a mean follow-up of 2.0 ± 1.4 years, 123 patients (25%) died. After multivariate analysis, LVMDR was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (HR 1.19[1.01;1.38], per 10° increase, P = .04) and reclassified 18% of patients with IDI 1.4% (P = .02) and NRI 9% (P = .057).


In patients with ICM, an increase of LVMD during peak gating stress as compared to rest was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality, and had a modest incremental prognostic value. Future studies are needed to validate our findings.


Cardiomyopathy abnormal MPI left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony response outcomes PET 


  1. 1.
    Chen J, Garcia EV, Bax JJ, Iskandrian AE, Borges-Neto S, Soman P. SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for the assessment of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony. J Nucl Cardiol 2011;18:685-94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    AlJaroudi W, Chen J, Jaber WA, Lloyd SG, Cerqueira M, Marwick T. Non-echocardiographic imaging of cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation: CV. Imaging 2011;4:334-43.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen J, Garcia EV, Folks RD, et al. Onset of left ventricular mechanical contraction as determined by phase analysis of ECG-gated myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging: Development of a diagnostic tool for assessment of cardiac mechanical dyssynchrony. J Nucl Cardiol 2005;12:687-95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    AlJaroudi W, Jaber WA, Grimm R, Marwick T, Cerqueira M. Alternative methods for the assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony by phase analysis of gated single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2011 (Epub ahead of print).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pazhenkottil AP, Buechel RR, Nkoulou R, et al. Left ventricular dyssynchrony assessment by phase analysis from gated PET-FDG scans. J Nucl Cardiol 2011;18:920-5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    AlJaroudi W, Alraies M, DiFillipo F, Brunken R, Cerqueira M, Jaber W. Left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony should be assessed from stress gated positron emission tomography in patients with normal myocardial perfusion. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2012;39:665-72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dorbala S, Hachamovitch R, Curillova Z, et al. Incremental prognostic value of gated Rb-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging over clinical variables and rest LVEF. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:846-54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hage FG, Dean P, Iqbal F, Heo J, Iskandrian AE. A blunted heart rate response to regadenoson is an independent prognostic indicator in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2011;18:1086-94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ficaro EP, Lee BC, Kritzman JN, Corbett JR. Corridor4DM: The Michigan method for quantitative nuclear cardiology. J Nucl Cardiol 2007;14:455-65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lauer MS, Blackstone EH, Young JB, Topol EJ. Cause of death in clinical research: Time for a reassessment? J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:618-20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cox D. Regression models and lifetables. J R Stat Soc Ser 1972;34:187-220.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB Sr, Steyerberg EW. Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers. Stat Med 2011;30:11-21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aljaroudi W, Koneru J, Heo J, Iskandrian AE. Impact of ischemia on left ventricular dyssynchrony by phase analysis of gated single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2011;18:36-42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen J, Faber TL, Cooke CD, Garcia EV. Temporal resolution of multiharmonic phase analysis of ECG-gated myocardial perfusion SPECT studies. J Nucl Cardiol 2008;15:383-91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rocchi G, Bertini M, Biffi M, et al. Exercise stress echocardiography is superior to rest echocardiography in predicting left ventricular reverse remodelling and functional improvement after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J 2009;30:89-97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Altman RK, McCarty D, Chen-Tournoux AA, et al. Usefulness of low-dose dobutamine echocardiography to predict response and outcome in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol 2011;108:252-7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hachamovitch R, Rozanski A, Shaw LJ, et al. Impact of ischaemia and scar on the therapeutic benefit derived from myocardial revascularization vs. medical therapy among patients undergoing stress-rest myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Eur Heart J 2011;32:1012-24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Nuclear Cardiology 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wael AlJaroudi
    • 1
  • M. Chadi Alraies
    • 2
  • Venu Menon
    • 1
  • Richard C. Brunken
    • 3
  • Manuel D. Cerqueira
    • 1
  • Wael A. Jaber
    • 1
  1. 1.Section of Cardiovascular Imaging, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Robert and Suzanne Tomsich Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Sydell and Arnold Miller Family Heart and Vascular InstituteCleveland ClinicClevelandUSA
  2. 2.Department of Hospital MedicinesCleveland ClinicClevelandUSA
  3. 3.Department of Nuclear MedicineCleveland ClinicClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations