Advertisement

Qualitative Theory of Dynamical Systems

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 1201–1224 | Cite as

Hopf Bifurcations in a Predator–Prey Model with an Omnivore

  • Yongjun Li
  • Valery G. RomanovskiEmail author
Article
  • 83 Downloads

Abstract

We study limit cycle bifurcations in a three-dimensional Lotka–Volterra system which models a food web of three species, one of which is an omnivore. First, using a new approach based on the elimination theory of the computational algebra we find necessary and sufficient conditions for existence of a pair of pure imaginary eigenvalues for the Jacobian of the system at the stationary point with positive coordinates. Then it is shown that the system can have two small limit cycles bifurcating from the singular point.

Keywords

Lotka–Volterra systems Center manifold Limit cycle Bifurcation 

Mathematics Subject Classification

34C23 37G15 34C60 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The first author acknowledges the support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11761044, 11661048) and the key constructive discipline of Lanzhou City University (LZCU-ZDJSXK-201706). The second author acknowledges the support by the Slovenian Research Agency (Program P1-0306, project N1-0063) and the grant of the Erwin Schrödinger International Institute for Mathematics and Physics (ESI) related to the Workshop on “Advances in Chemical Reaction Network Theory”. We also thank the reviewers for careful reading and valuable suggestions which helped to improve the manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    May, R.M., Leonard, W.J.: Nonlinear aspects of competition between three species. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 29, 243–253 (1975)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blé, G., Castellanos, V., Llibre, J., Quilantán, I.: Integrability and global dynamics of the May–Leonard model. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 14, 280–293 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chi, C.-W., Hsu, S.-B., Wu, L.-I.: On the asymmetric May–Leonard model of three competing species. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 58, 211–226 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Murza, A.C., Teruel, A.E.: Global dynamics of a family of 3-D Lotka–Volterra systems. Dyn. Syst. 25, 269–284 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schuster, P., Sigmund, K., Wolf, R.: On \(\omega \)-limit for competition between three species. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 37, 49–54 (1979)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zeeman, M.L.: Hopf bifurcations in competitive three dimensional Lotka–Volterra systems. Dyn. Stab. Syst. 8, 189–216 (1993)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gyllenberg, M., Yan, P., Wang, Y.: A 3D competitive Lotka–Volterra system with three limit cycles: a falsification of a conjecture by Hofbauer and So. Appl. Math. Lett. 19, 1–7 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang, Q.L., Huang, W.T., Wu, H.T.: Bifurcation of limit cycles for 3D Lotka–Volterra competitive systems. Acta. Appl. Math. 114, 207–218 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang, Q.L., Huang, W.T., Li, B.L.: Limit cycles and singular point quantities for a 3D Lotka–Volterra system. Appl. Math. Comput. 217, 8856–8859 (2011)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yu, P., Han, M., Xiao, D.: Four small limit cycles around a Hopf singular point in 3-dimensional competitive Lotka–Volterra systems. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 436(1), 521–555 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Antonov, V., Dolićanin, D., Romanovski, V.G., Toth, J.: Invariant planes and periodic oscillations in the May–Leonard asymmetric model. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 76, 455–474 (2016)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tanabe, K., Namba, T.: Omnivory creates chaos in simple food web models. Ecology 86, 3411–3414 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Previte, J.P., Hoffman, K.A.: Period doubling cascades in a predator-prey model with a scavenger. SIAM Rev. 55, 523–546 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Al-khedhairi, A., Elsadany, A.A., Elsonbaty, A., Abdelwahab, A.G.: Dynamical study of a chaotic predator-prey model with an omnivore. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133, 29 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kuznetsov, Y.A.: Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory. Springer, New York (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chow, S., Hale, J.K.: Methods of Bifurcation Theory. Springer, New York (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bibikov, Y.N.: Local Theory of Nonlinear Analytic Ordinary Differential Equations. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 702. Springer, New York (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sijbrand, J.: Properties of center manifolds. Trans. Am. Soc. 289, 431–469 (1985)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Errami, H., Eiswirth, M., Grigoriev, D., Seiler, W.M., Sturm, T., Weber, A.: Detection of Hopf bifurcations in chemical reaction networks using convex coordinates. J. Comput. Phys. 291, 279–302 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Niu, W., Wang, D.: Algebraic approaches to stability analysis of biological systems. Math. Comput. Sci. 1, 507–539 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Niu, W., Wang, D.: Algebraic analysis of stability and bifurcation of a self-assembling micelle system. Appl. Math. Comput. 219, 108–121 (2012)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sturm, T., Weber, A., Abdel-Rahman, E.O., El Kahoui, M.: Investigating algebraic and logical algorithms to solve Hopf bifurcation problems in algebraic biology. Math. Comput. Sci. 2(3), 493–515 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liu, W.-M.: Criterion of Hopf bifurcations without using eigenvalues. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 182, 250–256 (1994)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kruff, N., Walcher, S.: Coordinate-independent criteria for Hopf bifurcations. Preprint (2017). arXiv:1708.06545
  25. 25.
    Cox, D., Little, J., O’Shea, D.: Ideals, Varieties, and Algorithms. Springer, New York (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Collins, G.E.: Quantifier elimination for the elementary theory of real closed fields by cylindrical algebraic decomposition. In: Second GI Conference, Automata Theory and Formal Languages, LNCS, vol. 33, pp. 134–183 (1975)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Decker, W., Laplagne, S., Pfister, G., Schonemann, H.: SINGULAR (3-1 library for computing the prime decomposition and radical of ideals, primdec.lib) (2010)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gianni, P., Trager, B., Zacharias, G.: Gröbner bases and primary decomposition of polynomials. J. Symb. Comput. 6, 146–167 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Decker, W., Greuel, G.-M., Pfister, G., Shönemann, H.: Singular (4-1-2—A Computer Algebra System for Polynomial Computations (2019). http://www.singular.uni-kl.de)
  30. 30.
    Wang, Q.L., Liu, Y.R., Chen, H.B.: Hopf bifurcation for a class of three-dimensional nonlinear dynamic systems. Bull. Sci. Math. 134, 786–798 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Xia, Y., Grašič, M., Huang, W., Romanovski, V.G.: Limit cycles in a model of olfactory sensory neurons. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 29(3), 1950038 (2019)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pliss, V.A.: A reduction principle in the theory of stability of motion. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 28, 1297–1324 (1964)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Guckenheimer, J., Holmes, P.: Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems and Bifurcation of Vectorfields. Springer, New York (1990)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of MathematicsLanzhou City UniversityLanzhouChina
  2. 2.Faculty of Natural Science and MathematicsUniversity of MariborMariborSlovenia
  3. 3.Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of MariborMariborSlovenia
  4. 4.Center for Applied Mathematics and Theoretical PhysicsUniversity of MariborMariborSlovenia

Personalised recommendations