Non-Integrability of Some Few Body Problems in Two Degrees of Freedom
- 76 Downloads
The basic theory of Differential Galois and in particular Morales–Ramis theory is reviewed with focus in analyzing the non-integrability of various problems of few bodies in Celestial Mechanics. The main theoretical tools are: Morales–Ramis theorem, the algebrization method and Kovacic’s algorithm. Morales–Ramis states that if a Hamiltonian system is completely integrable with meromorphic first integrals in involution in a neighborhood of a specific solution, then the differential Galois group of the normal variational equations is abelian. In case of two degrees of freedom, completely integrable means to have an additional first integral in involution with the Hamiltonian. The algebrization method permits under general conditions to recast the variational equation in a form suitable for its analysis by means of Kovacic’s algorithm. We apply these tools to various examples of few body problems in Celestial Mechanics: (a) the elliptic restricted three body in the plane with collision of the primaries; (b) a general Hamiltonian system of two degrees of freedom with homogeneous potential of degree −1; here we perform McGehee’s blow up and obtain the normal variational equation in the form of an hypergeometric equation. We recover Yoshida’s criterion for non-integrability. Then we contrast two methods to compute the Galois group: the well known, based in the Schwartz–Kimura table, and the lesser based in Kovacic’s algorithm. We apply these methodology to three problems: the rectangular four body problem, the anisotropic Kepler problem and two uncoupled Kepler problems in the line; the last two depend on a mass parameter, but while in the anisotropic problem it is integrable for only two values of the parameter, the two uncoupled Kepler problems is completely integrable for all values of the masses.
KeywordsNon-integrability Differential Galois theory Celestial Mechanics
Mathematical Subject Classification (2000).Primary 37J30 Secondary 34M15
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Abraham, R., Marsden, J.E.: Foundations of Mechanics, 2nd edn. Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co. Inc. Advanced Book Program, Reading, MA (1978). Revised and enlarged, With the assistance of Tudor Raţiu and Richard CushmanGoogle Scholar
- 3.Acosta-Humanez, P.B.: Galoisian approach to supersymmetric quantum mechanics. Ph.D. thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (2009)Google Scholar
- 7.Arnold V.I.: Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 60. Springer, New York (1978)Google Scholar
- 9.Boucher, D., Weil, J.-A.: Application of J.-J. morales and J.-P. Ramis’ theorem to test the non-complete integrability of the planar three-body problem. From combinatorics to dynamical systems, IRMA Lectures in Mathematical and Theoretical Physics, vol. 3, pp. 163–177. de Gruyter, Berlin (2003)Google Scholar
- 13.Morales-Ruiz J.J.: Differential Galois Theory and Non-Integrability of Hamiltonian Systems. Progress in Mathematics, vol. 179. Birkhäuser, Basel (1999)Google Scholar
- 14.Morales-Ruiz, J.J.: A remark about the Painlevé transcendents, Théories asymptotiques et équations de Painlevé, Sémin. Congr. Angiers, vol. 14, pp. 229–235. Society of Mathematics, France, Paris (2006)Google Scholar
- 21.Simoni Estrada S.: On the Non-Integrability of Some Problems in Celestial Mechanics. Vdm Verlag Dr Mueller EK, Berlin (2008)Google Scholar
- 22.Szebehely V.G.: Theory of Orbits. Academic Press, New York (1966)Google Scholar
- 26.Put M., Singer M.F.: Galois Theory of Linear Differential Equations, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 328. Springer, Berlin (2003)Google Scholar
- 28.Whittaker, E.T.: A Treatise on the Analytical Dynamics of Particles and Rigid Bodies. Cambridge Mathematical Library, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988). With an introduction to the problem of three bodies, Reprint of the 1937 edition, With a foreword by William McCreaGoogle Scholar