Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 201–207 | Cite as

Significance of genetic polymorphisms in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Clinical Review

Abstract

Because of recent advances in genetic research such as genome-wide association studies, the underlying genetic mechanisms of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) pathophysiology have been elucidated. Here, we present a review of the current literature on the impact of genetic polymorphisms in patients with NAFLD. These genetic polymorphisms, which regulate lipid metabolism, glucose metabolism, and the renin-angiotensin system, are involved in NAFLD onset, steatosis, inflammation, fibrosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Among these genetic polymorphisms, many studies and meta-analyses have demonstrated that position 148 (rs738409 C/G) of the patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein (PNPLA3) is a genetic factor associated with NAFLD pathophysiological features, such as hepatic fat level, hepatic inflammation, fibrosis, and HCC. However, the impact of genetic polymorphisms on NAFLD pathophysiology appears to differ among ethnic groups. Therefore, further studies with larger sample sizes are needed for each ethnic group.

Keywords

Genetic polymorphism NAFLD NASH Steatosis Inflammation Fibrosis 

Introduction

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the most common liver diseases worldwide. A large Japanese cohort study indicated that 29.7% of the adult population has NAFLD [1]. NAFLD is associated with metabolic syndrome, including obesity, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and diabetes [2, 3]. Therefore, NAFLD is considered part of the metabolic syndrome [3]. With an increasing number of patients with metabolic disease, the prevalence of NAFLD patients is increasing in Japan [1]. NAFLD encompasses a wide range of diseases, including non-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFL), non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [4, 5]. It has been determined that several environmental factors, such as lifestyle and enteral environment, affect the development of NASH. However, disease state in NAFLD is difference in individual at any body mass index or visceral fat. Furthermore, studies of twin subjects have suggested the heritability of NAFLD [6]. Therefore, NAFLD could be influenced by genetic variants. Indeed, several single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been reported to affect pathophysiology in patients with chronic liver disease including NAFLD through a genome-wide association study (GWAS). Over the last 10 years, many studies have also revealed the role of genetic factors in the development of steatosis, fibrosis, cirrhosis, and HCC in NAFLD. In this review, we discuss the genetic factors implicated in steatosis, steatohepatitis, fibrosis progression, cirrhosis, and HCC in NAFLD patients.

Genetic polymorphisms of lipid metabolism (Table 1)

About half of Japanese patients with NAFLD have hyperlipidemia [7]. Lipid metabolism in the liver and peripheral tissue plays a critical role in NAFLD onset and progression. Thus, there are many reports of gene polymorphisms involved in lipid metabolism that are associated with NAFLD and NAFLD fibrosis progression.
Table 1

Characteristics of genetic polymorphisms involved in lipid metabolism

Gene

Patient ethnicity

Polymorphism

Association

Reference

PNPLA3

Mixed (Hispanic/Caucasian/African American)

rs738409 I148M (C/G)

Steatosis

[8]

PNPLA3

Japanese

I148M (C/G)

Steatosis, fibrosis

[9, 10]

PNPLA3

Taiwan, Pediatric

I148M (C/G)

Steatosis

[18]

MTP

Caucasian (French)

−493 (G/T)

Steatohepatitis

[26]

MTP

Japanese

−493 (G/T)

Intracellular triglyceride accumulation

[27]

MTP

Chinese

rs1800804 (−164T/C) rs1057613 A/G rs3805335 C/T

NAFLD

[29]

APOC3

India

rs651821 C-482T, T-455C

NAFLD, insulin resistance

[29]

APOC3

Caucasian (Italian/United Kingdom)

rs651821 C-482T, T-455C

Favorable lipid profile

[30]

TM6SF2

Mixed (Hispanic/Caucasian/African American)

rs58542926

Hepatic steatosis

[34]

PPARα

Brazilian

Leu162Val

Fibrosis

[38]

PPARα

Chinese

Val227Ala

NAFLD

[40]

PPARγ

Germany

Pro12Ala

NAFLD

[43]

PPARγ

Indian

Pro12Ala

NAFLD, overweight

[44]

PNPLA3 patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein, MTP microsomal triglyceride transfer protein, APOC3 apolipoprotein C3, PPAR peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor, NAFLD nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein (PNPLA3)

A polymorphism in PNPLA3 at position 148 of the protein, which causes an isoleucine (rs738409-C) to methionine (rs738409-G) substitution, was identified as a genetic factor associated with increased hepatic fat level and hepatic inflammation by GWAS [8]. Subsequently, many studies of this polymorphism have been reported. In addition, the rs738409-GG genotype was associated with a higher risk of liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and HCC [9, 10, 11].

The PNPLA3 gene encodes the protein adiponutrin, which is expressed in the liver [12], where the replacement of isoleucine with methionine reduces its hydrolytic activity for triglycerides [13]. PNPLA3 is also expressed in adipose tissue [14] and the adrenal gland [15], and it is closely related to the major triglyceride hydrolete in peripheral fat tissue [16].

In the Japanese population, the rs738409-GG genotype was associated with susceptibility to NAFLD and with histological fibrosis stage [9, 10]. In addition, the rs738409-G allele was associated with hepatic steatosis as measured by ultrasonography and with overweight in pediatric subjects in Italy and Taiwan [17, 18]. The rs738409-G allele also increases the risk of HCC in patients with NAFLD. Compared to the CC genotype, the GC and GG genotypes exhibit increased risk for HCC (ORs 2.52 and 12.19, respectively) [19]. The frequency of the rs738409-GG genotype is higher among the Japanese (23%) and Hispanic (33%) populations than among the African American (1.6%) or European American (4%) populations [8, 9, 10].

Liver steatosis is observed in 18–40% patients after liver transplantation. Finkenstedts et al. reported that the rs738409 genotype of the recipient, but not the donor was associated with post-transplant steatosis [20]. In contrast, in our recent study, an rs738409-GG genotype in the donor was a predictor of post-transplant steatosis (in submission). In addition, the donor PNPLA3 genotype was reported to be the predictor of post-transplant outcome among liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C virus [21]. Finally, the rs738409-G allele has been reported to be associated with steatosis and/or fibrosis and HCC in other liver diseases, including hepatitis B and C and alcoholic liver disease [22].

Microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP)

MTP has a pivotal role in metabolizing hepatic triglycerides and very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL) for lipid export from the liver [23]. Therefore, MTP plays an important role in lipid metabolism. Some previous studies reported that functional polymorphisms of MTP were associated with reduced low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels [24]. Among French and Japanese patients, a polymorphism (promoter −493 G-allele) in the MTP gene is correlated with down-regulation of the MTP gene, corresponding to NASH and more severe steatosis [25, 26]. In contrast, in a Brazilian study, there was no association between the −493 G/T polymorphism and NAFLD [27]. The frequency of the MTP gene polymorphism (−493 GG-genotype) was similar among Japanese (60.7%), French (55.7%), and Brazilian (59.3%) individuals [25, 26, 27]. Finally, Peng et al. examined 580 NAFLD patients and 580 healthy controls in China. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that rs1800804 (−164 T/C) was associated with an increased risk of NAFLD, while rs1057613 A/C and rs3805335 C/T were associated with a decreased risk of NAFLD [28].

Apolipoprotein C3 (APOC3)

APOC3 regulates lipoprotein lipase activity. An APOC3 variant (C-482T, T-455C, or both) resulted in a 30% increase in the plasma concentration of apolipoprotein C3 as compared with that in the wild-type. There was also an increase in plasma triglycerides and tetinyl fatty acid ester concentrations by a factor of approximately two after an oral fat-tolerance test. The average hepatic triglyceride content was higher in individuals carrying the APOC3 rs651821 variant alleles (C-482T, T-455C, or both) than in wild-type homozygotes. In addition, the prevalence of NAFLD was 38% among the APOC3 variant-allele group and 0% among wild-type homozygotes. Subjects with NAFLD also exhibited marked insulin resistance [29]. In contrast, in Italy and the United Kingdom, the APOC3 wild-type genotype was associated with a more favorable lipid profile but not with insulin resistance, NASH, or increased fibrosis [30]. Moreover, among Finnish subjects, APOC3 variants were not associated with liver fat content due to NAFLD [31]. The prevalence of variant APOC3 alleles was found to be 79.7% in Asian Indian, 66.8% in Italian, and 80% in Finnish individuals [29, 30, 31].

Transmembrane 6 superfamily member 2 (TM6SF2)

A TM6SF2 variant was identified in an exome-wide association study. This variant was not associated with body mass index (BMI), homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), or alcohol intake. Knockdown of TM6SF2 in mice increased liver triglyceride content by threefold and decreased VLDL secretion by 50%. Thus, these data indicate that TM6SF2 activity is required for normal VLDL secretion. The TM6SF2 variant associated with hepatic triglyceride content is an adenine-to-guanine substitution at coding nucleotide 499. Moreover, the TM6SF2 variant genotype affects inflammation and liver fibrosis stage [32]. However, a recent study in a Japanese cohort demonstrated that the TM6SF2 genotype was not associated with steatosis, inflammation, or liver fibrosis stage [33]. TM6SF2 (rs10401969) also influences the total cholesterol level and was associated with a reduction in coronary artery disease events in a large sample of 20,597 cases and 61,046 controls (OR 0.90, p = 2 × 10−4) [34].

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)

PPARs are members of a family of nuclear receptors and play an important role in lipid metabolism. Members of the PPAR family include PPARα, PPARγ, and PPARδ. PPARα regulates fatty acid uptake and the oxidation of fatty acids. It is expressed in tissues such as the liver, heart, muscle, and brown adipose tissue [35]. In a Brazilian study, the polymorphism Leu162Val in PPARα was associated with NAFLD fibrosis [36], while in an Italian study, the frequency of the Leu162Val polymorphism did not differ between patients with NAFLD and a control group [37]. However, the frequency of another PPARα polymorphism, Val227Ala, was significantly different between subjects with NAFLD and a control group in China [38]. In Japan, Yamakawa et al. reported that the Val227Ala allele was associated with total cholesterol [39].

PPARγ is expressed in adipocytes, macrophages, and muscle, where it regulates abiogenesis, lipid storage, and glucose metabolism [40]. The polymorphism Pro12Ala in PPARγ among German subjects was more frequently found in NAFLD patients than in controls. However, the Pro12Ala polymorphism was not associated with NAFLD progression [41]. Similarly, in Italian NAFLD patients, Pro12Ala was not associated with NAFLD onset, liver damage, or insulin resistance [37]. Gupta et al. showed that the prevalence of the Pro12Ala variant was higher among Indian NAFLD subjects than among controls. In addition, the Pro12Ala variant was also associated with overweight [42]. This result suggests that the Pro12Ala variant plays a role in obesity-related NAFLD.

Genetic polymorphisms of glucose metabolism (Table 2)

Glucose intolerance, including insulin resistance, is a risk factor for the development of steatosis, NASH, and cirrhosis in patients with NAFLD.
Table 2

Characteristics of genetic polymorphisms involved in glucose metabolism, renin-angiotensin, and others

Gene

Patients ethnicity

Polymorphism

Association

Reference

ENPP1

Caucasian (Italian, United Kingdom)

Lys121Gln

Body weight, dyslipidemia, fibrosis

[48]

IRS-1

Caucasian (Italian, United Kingdom)

Gly972Arg

Dyslipidemia, fibrosis

[48]

Adiponectin

Italian

+45T/G

Hepatic steatosis, necroinflammatory grade

[52]

Adiponectin

Japanese

−493 (G/T)

Steatohepatitis

[53]

AGT

Japanese

rs7079 SNP

Steatohepatitis

 

AGTR1

Japanese

rs3772622, rs3772633, rs2276736, rs3772630, rs3772627

NAFLD, fibrosis

[58]

IL28B

Italian

rs12979860 (CC)

Inflammation, fibrosis

[63]

ENPP1 ectoenzyme nucleotide pyrophosphate phosphodiesterase, IRS insulin receptor substrate, AGT angiotensinogen, AGTR1 angiotensin II type 1 receptor, IL28B interleukin 28B

Ectoenzyme nucleotide pyrophosphate phosphodiesterase 1 (ENPP) and insulin receptor substrate (IRS)

Insulin resistance is a key factor in NAFLD pathophysiology. The presence of metabolic syndrome is associated with the severity of NAFLD [2, 3]. In addition, insulin resistance is associated with liver damage and fibrosis [43]. In hepatocytes, insulin binds to the insulin receptor, activating insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-1 and IRS-2 and in turn leading to the phosphorylation of transcription factors that regulate the glucose level [44]. ENPP1 inhibits the insulin signal and causes insulin resistance [45]. Among the genes involved in the regulation of the insulin signal, it has been reported that genetic polymorphisms of ENPP1 and IRS-1 influence insulin receptor activity and are associated with liver damage [46]. In studies in Italy and the United Kingdom, multivariate analysis revealed that the ENPP1 121Gln and IRS-1 972Arg polymorphisms, present in 28.7 and 18.1% of patients respectively, were independently associated with advanced fibrosis in NAFLD patients. In addition, these polymorphisms were associated with a reduction in AKT status, reflecting insulin resistance and disease severity in patients with NAFLD [46].

Adiponectin

Adiponectin is a cytokine secreted from adipose tissue, also known as an adipokine. Adiponectin plays an important role in hepatic and peripheral glucose metabolism and has an anti-inflammatory function [47]. Several studies have reported that systemic levels of adiponectin are reduced in NASH patients [48] and correlated with liver fibrosis [49]. Musoo et al. demonstrated that in an Italian cohort, an adiponectin genotype (+45T/G) was associated with hepatic steatosis, necroinflammatory grade, and postprandial adiponectin levels [50]. Similarly, associations between +45T/G and HOMA-IR and liver fibrosis were reported among Japanese NAFLD patients [51]. In an Indian population, −11377GG and +45T/G were associated with NAFLD [52]. The frequency of +45GG, a well-known adiponectin SNP, was found to vary in Japanese (NAFLD 10.9%, control 10.4%) and Indian (NAFLD 5.1%, control 0.8%) individuals with and without NAFLD [51, 52].

Genetic polymorphisms of hypertension (Table 2)

Hypertension is one of the diseases included in the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome, and it is associated with the progression of NAFLD [2, 53]. The activity of the renin-angiotensin system influences hypertension and liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease [54].

Angiotensinogen (AGT) and angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AGTR1)

AGT is well known to be an important regulator of blood pressure. Some previous reports have shown that genetic polymorphisms of AGT and angiotensin receptor (AGTR) influence serum AGT levels and hypertension. The frequency of the rs7079-A allele in NASH patients (21.0%) was found to be significantly higher than that in healthy controls (13.0%). Regarding haplotypes of the AGT gene, the CTA/- frequency in NASH patients was significantly higher than that in healthy controls. In addition, the diastolic blood pressure in patients with the CTA/- haplotype was significantly higher than that in patients with other haplotypes [55].

Angiotensin II function involves AGTR1. This receptor is expressed on hepatic stellate cells, which play an important role in liver fibrosis progression. Five SNPs (rs3772622, rs3772633, rs2276736, rs3772630, and rs3772627) in AGTR1 were found to be significantly associated with NAFLD. Moreover, there was a significant association between rs3773622 genotypes and liver fibrosis [56].

Genetic variants in mediators of inflammation (Table 2)

Interleukin 28B (IL28B)

Genetic polymorphisms of IL28B (rs12979860 CC and rs809917 TT) have been reported as predictors of the sustained virological response (SVR) after interferon therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C [57, 58, 59]. Moreover, previous studies have demonstrated that this IL28B polymorphism was associated with severity of disease, steatosis, and fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C [60, 61, 62]. In Italian patients with NAFLD, multivariate analysis showed that the rs12979860-CC genotype is independently associated with moderate to severe inflammation and severe fibrosis [63]. However, in a cohort of Caucasian North American patients, the rs12979860-CC genotype did not affect the histological features of patients with NAFLD [64]. In contrast, meta-analysis showed that rs8099917-TT was significantly associated with a reduced risk of severe steatosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C [62].

In conclusion, a variety of genetic polymorphisms appear to influence NAFLD onset and the severity of steatosis, necroinflammation, and fibrosis. However, the influence of genetic polymorphisms on NAFLD pathophysiology seems to differ among ethnic groups. Therefore, validation studies in each ethnic group should be performed in the future.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Eguchi Y, Hyogo H, Ono M, et al. Prevalence and associated metabolic factors of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the general population from 2009 to 2010 in Japan: a multicenter large retrospective study. J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:586–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Miyaaki H, Ichikawa T, Nakao K, et al. Clinicopathological study of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Japan: the risk factors for fibrosis. Liver Int. 2008;28:519–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marchesini G, Brizi M, Bianchi G, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a feature of the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes. 2001;50:1844–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ekstedt M, Franzen LE, Mathiesen UL, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with NAFLD and elevated liver enzymes. Hepatology. 2006;44:865–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bugianesi E, Leone N, Vanni E, et al. Expanding the natural history of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: from cryptogenic cirrhosis to hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:134–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Loomba R, Schork N, Chen CH, et al. Heritability of hepatic fibrosis and steatosis based on a prospective twin study. Gastroenterology. 2015;149:1784–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nakahara T, Hyogo H, Yoneda M, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with the fibrosis severity in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in a large retrospective cohort of Japanese patients. J Gastroenterol. 2014;49:1477–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Romeo S, Kozlitina J, Xing C, et al. Genetic variation in PNPLA3 confers susceptibility to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat Genet. 2008;40:1461–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hotta K, Yoneda M, Hyogo H, et al. Association of the rs738409 polymorphism in PNPLA3 with liver damage and the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. BMC Med Genet. 2010;11:172.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kawaguchi T, Sumida Y, Umemura A, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of the human PNPLA3 gene are strongly associated with severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Japanese. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e38322.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sookoian S, Pirola CJ. Meta-analysis of the influence of I148M variant of patatin-like phospholipase domain containing 3 gene (PNPLA3) on the susceptibility and histological severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2011;53:1883–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lake AC, Sun Y, Li JL, Kim JE, et al. Expression, regulation, and triglyceride hydrolase activity of Adiponutrin family members. J Lipid Res. 2005;46:2477–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    He S, McPhaul C, Li JZ, et al. A sequence variation (I148M) in PNPLA3 associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease disrupts triglyceride hydrolysis. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:6706–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baulande S, Lasnier F, Lucas M, et al. Adiponutrin, a transmembrane protein corresponding to a novel dietary- and obesity-linked mRNA specifically expressed in the adipose lineage. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:33336–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kershaw EE, Hamm JK, Verhagen LA, et al. Adipose triglyceride lipase: function, regulation by insulin, and comparison with adiponutrin. Diabetes. 2006;55:148–57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zimmermann R, Strauss JG, Haemmerle G, et al. Fat mobilization in adipose tissue is promoted by adipose triglyceride lipase. Science. 2004;306:1383–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Romeo S, Sentinelli F, Cambuli VM, et al. The 148 M allele of the PNPLA3 gene is associated with indices of liver damage early in life. J Hepatol. 2010;53:335–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lin YC, Chang PF, Hu FC, et al. A common variant in the PNPLA3 gene is a risk factor for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in obese Taiwanese children. J Pediatr. 2011;158:740–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu YL, Patman GL, Leathart JB, et al. Carriage of the PNPLA3 rs738409 C > G polymorphism confers an increased risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease associated hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2014;61:75–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Finkenstedt A, Auer C, Glodny B, et al. Patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 3 rs738409-G in recipients of liver transplants is a risk factor for graft steatosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11:1667–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dunn W, O’Neil M, Zhao J, et al. Donor PNPLA3 rs738409 genotype affects fibrosis progression in liver transplantation for hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2014;59:453–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dongiovanni P, Donati B, Fares R, et al. PNPLA3 I148M polymorphism and progressive liver disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:6969–78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Levy E, Stan S, Delvin E, et al. Localization of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein in the Golgi: possible role in the assembly of chylomicrons. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:16470–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Karpe F, Lundahl B, Ehrenborg E, et al. A common functional polymorphism in the promoter region of the microsomal triglyceride transfer protein gene influences plasma LDL levels. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998;18:756–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bernard S, Touzet S, Personne I, et al. Association between microsomal triglyceride transfer protein gene polymorphism and the biological features of liver steatosis in patients with type II diabetes. Diabetologia. 2000;43:995–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Namikawa C, Shu-Ping Z, Vyselaar JR, et al. Polymorphisms of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein gene and manganese superoxide dismutase gene in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. J Hepatol. 2004;40:781–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Oliveira CP, Stefano JT, Cavaleiro AM, et al. Association of polymorphisms of glutamate-cystein ligase and microsomal triglyceride transfer protein genes in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25:357–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Peng XE, Wu YL, Lu QQ, et al. MTTP polymorphisms and susceptibility to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in a Han Chinese population. Liver Int. 2014;34:118–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Petersen KF, Dufour S, Hariri A, et al. Apolipoprotein C3 gene variants in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1082–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Valenti L, Nobili V, Al-Serri A, et al. The APOC3 T-455C and C-482T promoter region polymorphisms are not associated with the severity of liver damage independently of PNPLA3 I148 M genotype in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver. J Hepatol. 2011;55:1409–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hyysalo J, Stojkovic I, Kotronen A, et al. Genetic variation in PNPLA3 but not APOC3 influences liver fat in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;27:951–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kozlitina J, Smagris E, Stender S, et al. Exome-wide association study identifies a TM6SF2 variant that confers susceptibility to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat Genet. 2014;46:352–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Akuta N, Kawamura Y, Arase Y, et al. Relationships between genetic variations of PNPLA3, TM6SF2 and histological features of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Japan. Gut Liver. 2016;10:437–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Holmen OL, Zhang H, Fan Y, et al. Systematic evaluation of coding variation identifies a candidate causal variant in TM6SF2 influencing total cholesterol and myocardial infarction risk. Nat Genet. 2014;46:345–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Berger J, Moller DE. The mechanisms of action of PPARs. Annu Rev Med. 2002;53:409–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Domenici FA, Brochado MJ, Martinelli Ade L, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors alpha and gamma2 polymorphisms in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a study in Brazilian patients. Gene. 2013;529:326–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dongiovanni P, Rametta R, Fracanzani AL, et al. Lack of association between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors alpha and gamma2 polymorphisms and progressive liver damage in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a case control study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010;10:102.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chen S, Li Y, Li S, Yu C. A Val227Ala substitution in the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha (PPAR alpha) gene associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and decreased waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:1415–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Yamakawa-Kobayashi K, Ishiguro H, et al. A Val227Ala polymorphism in the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha) gene is associated with variations in serum lipid levels. J Med Genet. 2002;39:189–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wu Z, Rosen ED, Brun R, Hauser S, et al. Cross-regulation of C/EBP alpha and PPAR gamma controls the transcriptional pathway of adipogenesis and insulin sensitivity. Mol Cell. 1999;3:151–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rey JW, Noetel A, Hardt A, et al. Pro12Ala polymorphism of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma2 in patients with fatty liver diseases. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:5830–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gupta AC, Chaudhory AK, Sukriti Pande C, et al. Peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor gamma2 Pro12Ala variant is associated with body mass index in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients. Hepatol Int. 2010;5:575–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Fracanzani AL, Valenti L, Bugianesi E, et al. Risk of severe liver disease in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with normal aminotransferase levels: a role for insulin resistance and diabetes. Hepatology. 2008;48:792–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Accili D, Arden KC. FoxOs at the crossroads of cellular metabolism, differentiation, and transformation. Cell. 2004;117:421–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Grarup N, Urhammer SA, Ek J, et al. Studies of the relationship between the ENPP1 K121Q polymorphism and type 2 diabetes, insulin resistance and obesity in 7,333 Danish white subjects. Diabetologia. 2006;49:2097–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Dongiovanni P, Valenti L, Rametta R, et al. Genetic variants regulating insulin receptor signalling are associated with the severity of liver damage in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Gut. 2010;59:267–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wolf G. Adiponectin: a regulator of energy homeostasis. Nutr Rev. 2003;61:290–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Pagano C, Soardo G, Esposito W, et al. Plasma adiponectin is decreased in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Eur J Endocrinol. 2005;152:113–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ma H, Gomez V, Lu L, et al. Expression of adiponectin and its receptors in livers of morbidly obese patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24:233–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Musso G, Gambino R, De Michieli F, et al. Adiponectin gene polymorphisms modulate acute adiponectin response to dietary fat: possible pathogenetic role in NASH. Hepatology. 2008;47:1167–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Tokushige K, Hashimoto E, Noto H, et al. Influence of adiponectin gene polymorphisms in Japanese patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:976–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Gupta AC, Misra R, Sakhuja P, et al. Association of adiponectin gene functional polymorphisms (−11377C/G and +45T/G) with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gene. 2012;496:63–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Marchesini G, Bugianesi E, Forlani G, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver, steatohepatitis, and the metabolic syndrome. Hepatology. 2003;37:917–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Yoshiji H, Kuriyama S, Yoshii J, et al. Angiotensin-II type 1 receptor interaction is a major regulator for liver fibrosis development in rats. Hepatology. 2001;34:745–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ono M, Ochi T, Munekage K, et al. Angiotensinogen gene haplotype is associated with the prevalence of Japanese non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatol Res. 2011;41:1223–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Yoneda M, Hotta K, Nozaki Y, et al. Association between angiotensin II type 1 receptor polymorphisms and the occurrence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Liver Int. 2009;29:1078–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ge D, Fellay J, Thompson AJ, et al. Genetic variation in IL28B predicts hepatitis C treatment-induced viral clearance. Nature. 2009;461:399–401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Suppiah V, Moldovan M, Ahlenstiel G, et al. IL28B is associated with response to chronic hepatitis C interferon-alpha and ribavirin therapy. Nat Genet. 2009;41:1100–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Tanaka Y, Nishida N, Sugiyama M, et al. Genome-wide association of IL28B with response to pegylated interferon-alpha and ribavirin therapy for chronic hepatitis C. Nat Genet. 2009;41:1105–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Tillmann HL, Patel K, Muir AJ, Guy CD, et al. Beneficial IL28B genotype associated with lower frequency of hepatic steatosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatol. 2011;55:1195–200.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Abe H, Ochi H, Maekawa T, et al. Common variation of IL28 affects gamma-GTP levels and inflammation of the liver in chronically infected hepatitis C virus patients. J Hepatol. 2010;53:439–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Sato M, Kondo M, Tateishi R, et al. Impact of IL28B genetic variation on HCV-induced liver fibrosis, inflammation, and steatosis: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e91822.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Petta S, Grimaudo S, Camma C, et al. IL28B and PNPLA3 polymorphisms affect histological liver damage in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2012;56:1356–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Garrett ME, Abdelmalek MF, Ashley-Koch A, et al. IL28B rs12979860 is not associated with histologic features of NAFLD in a cohort of Caucasian North American patients. J Hepatol. 2013;58:402–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Gastroenterology 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyNagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesNagasakiJapan

Personalised recommendations