Silicones are inorganic compounds that have been used for the purpose of shunting ventricular fluid since the mid-20th century . Complications of ventriculoperitoneal shunts have rarely been attributed to silicone allergy, with only a handful of cases reported in literature. The classic presentation of allergy to silicone ventriculoperitoneal shunt, i.e., abdominal pain with recurrent skin breakdown along the shunt tract, is nonspecific and difficult to distinguish clinically from other causes of shunt-related symptoms. It can be diagnosed by detection of antisilicone antibodies and is treated with removal of the shunt and replacement, if needed, with a polyurethane shunt system. We report the first case of suspected silicone allergy presenting as clinical peritonitis without overt colonic perforation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access
M.K. wrote and edited the manuscript, K.L., P.G., M.F., C.U., and K.F. all participated in the patient’s care and provided significant edits to the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
This article required no funding, and to our knowledge none of the authors involved have any conflict of interest.
All of the procedures were performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.
Informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case.
Pudenz RH, Russell FE, Hurd AH. Ventriculoauricostomy: a technique for shunting cerebrospinal fluid to the right auricle. J Neurosurg. 1957;14:171–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Okano Y, Nishikai M, Sato A. Scleroderma, primary biliary cirrhosis and Sjogren’s syndrome after cosmetic breast augmentation with silicone injection. Ann Rheumatol Dis. 1986;90:588–93.Google Scholar
Kircher T. Silicone lymphadenopathy, a complication of silicone elastomer finger joint prosthesis. Hum Pathol. 1980;11:240.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Marcusson JA, Bjarnason B. Unusual skin reaction to silicone content in breast implants. Acta Derm Venereol. 1999;79:136–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Chen YC, Chen ML, Chiu YM. A case of mimicking angioedema: chin silicone granulomatous reaction spreading all over the face after receiving liquid silicone injection forty years previously. Chin Med J. 2011;124(11):1747–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Dargan D, McGoldrick C, Khan K. Type IV hypersensitivity to a textured silicone breast implant. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65(7):969–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Narini PP, Semple JL, Hay JB. Repeated exposure to silicone gel can induce delayed hypersensitivity. Plast Reconstruct Surg. 1995;96:371–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow RB, Kosssovsky N. Hypersensitivity reaction associated with sterile ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction. Surg Neurol. 1989;31:209–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Goldblum RM, Pelley RP, O’Donnell AA, et al. Antibodies to silicone elastomers and reactions to ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Lancet. 1992;340:510–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Gower DJ, Lewis JC, Kelly DL Jr. Sterile shunt malfunction: a scanning electron microscopic perspective. J Neurosurg. 1984;61:1079–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Jiminez D, Keating R, Goodrich J. Silicone allergy in ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Childs Nerv Syst. 1994;10:59–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlee JD, Brodkey JS, Schaefer IK. Colonic perforation by ventriculoperitoneal shunt tubing: a case of suspected silicone allergy. Surg Neurol. 1998;49:21–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Hussain NS, Wang PP, James C, et al. Distal ventriculoperitoneal shunt failure caused by silicone allergy. J Neurosurg. 2005;102:536–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Tangsinmankong N, Nelson RP Jr, Good RA. Glucocorticosteroid treatment for cerebrospinal fluid eosinophilia in a patient with ventriculoperitonial shunt. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1999;83:341–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar