A Prospective Study of Comparing the Application of Two Generation Scoring Systems in Patients with Acute Cerebral Infarction
This study aims to compare the value of acute physiologic and chronic health evaluation scoring systems (APACHE II and APACHE III) among patients with acute cerebral infarction.
The APACHE II and APACHE III scores were determined in 399 patients with acute cerebral infarction within 24 h of admission in order to investigate their predictive value for prognosis in acute cerebral infarction. The area under the ROC curve was used to measure the ability of two scoring systems in predicting the prognosis of patients, and the area under the curve of the two scoring systems was compared.
The APACHE II and APACHE III scoring systems demonstrated good predictive value for prognosis in acute cerebral infarction, and the areas under the receiver operating characteristic were 0.808 and 0.818, respectively. There was no significant difference in the area under the curve between these two scoring systems.
Both the APACHE II and APACHE III scoring systems had good predictive value for prognosis in acute cerebral infarction, and there was no obvious difference between these two systems. Preference was suggested for APACHE II.
KeywordsAcute cerebral infarction Acute physiologic and chronic health evaluation Illness assessment Prognosis
No funding or sponsorship was received for this study or publication of this article. The Rapid Service Fee was funded by the authors.
All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given their approval for this version to be published.
Qun-Xi Li, Xiao-Jing Zhao, Yan-Bo Peng, Da-Li Wang, Xiao-Liu Dong, Hai-Yan Fan, Rui-Ying Chen, Jiang Zhang, Li Zhang and Jian Liu have nothing to disclose.
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
This study was conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki and compliance with Ethics Guidelines. This study was conducted with approval from the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of North China University of Science and Technology. Written informed consent was obtained from the participants or their guardians.
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article/as supplementary information files.
- 1.Ji CL, Zhou HR, Peng CH, Yang XL, Zhang Q. Comparison of value of GRACE, APACHE II and REMS for early prognosis of death in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Chin Crit Care Med. 2013;25:660–3 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- 2.Song DG, Chen XX, Zhang F, Liu LY, Song WP, Zuo ZG, Liu XJ, Qiu F. The influence of local mild hypothermia on cerebral infarct volume and APACHEII scoring of patients with posterior circulation infarct after intravenous thrombolysis. Chin J Gerontol. 2015;16:4561–2 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- 3.Zhao XJ, Li QX, An YC, Wang DL, Chen RY, Gao SL. Application of several scoring systems in prognosis of acute ischemic stroke and establishment of mathematical models. Chin J Neuromed. 2014;13:722–6 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- 4.Zhang J, Wang DL, Peng YB, Zhao XJ, Chang LS, Zhang L. Prognostic value of scoring systems for acute cerebral infarction of stroke patients. Chin J Geriatr Heart Brain Vessel Dis. 2011;13:1108–11 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- 5.Liu H. Application of APACHE II scoring system in prognostic evaluation of critical patients in emergency department. China J Mod Med. 2012;22:100–2 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- 6.Luo T. Clinical value of APACHEII scoring to predict the prognosis of critical patients in emergency. Proc Clin Med. 2013;22:730–2 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- 7.Wang SH, He GP, Zeng C, Zhou JH, Xia XC. Illness severity and prognosis assessment with acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II for patients after cardiovascular surgery. J Central South Univ (Med Sci). 2013;38:419–24 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- 8.Gu W, Yin WP, Li CS. Cardiac troponin I and APACHE II score predict myocardial dysfunction and adverse outcome in critically ill patients. Chin J Pract Intern Med. 2007;27:1373–5 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- 9.Zhao XJ, Li QX, Zhang L, An YC, Wang DL. Predictive value of eight rating scales in recent death for patients with acute ischemic stroke. J Clin Neurol. 2014;3:172–5 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- 10.Chen QY, Zhnag DH, Zhang XF, Wang LM, Guan JH. The relationship between the levels and variability of blood glucose and the prognosis of massive cerebral infarction. Chin Crit Care Med. 2013;25:749–53.Google Scholar
- 12.Wang XP. Clinical significance of the scoring system of APACHEIII, SAPSII and APACHEII to evaluate critical patients in the internal department. Chin Foreign Med Res. 2015;13:133–4.Google Scholar
- 13.Gao HM, Chang WX, Cao SH. Prognosis evaluation of APACHE scoring on MODS patients after liver transplantation. Chin Crit Care Med. 2004;16:371–2.Google Scholar
- 14.Deng XH, Wang LM. The significance of APACHEIII scoring system on evaluating condition and prognosis of patients with severe burns. Proc Clin Med. 2015;24:166–70.Google Scholar
- 15.Deng XD, Lian SJ. The value of APACHEII scoring on prognosis in the intensive care unit. Chin Community Dr. 2012;14:56–8.Google Scholar