Advertisement

Advances in Therapy

, Volume 35, Issue 8, pp 1232–1238 | Cite as

Permacol™ Collagen Paste Injection in Anal Fistula Treatment: A Retrospective Study with One-Year Follow-Up

  • Mehmet Bayrak
  • Yasemin Altıntas
Original Research

Abstract

Introduction

This study aimed to evaluate the applicability, safety, results, and functional performance of Permacol™ collagen paste injection in patients with an anal fistula.

Methods

Thirty-one patients with anal fistula underwent Permacol™ collagen paste injection between February 2015 and February 2017. The patients were followed up for a total of 12 months with recovery conditions monitored at intervals of 3, 6, and 12 months. Preoperative insertion of seton was performed in 15 patients for a period of 6–8 weeks and 2 patients for a period of 12 weeks.

Results

A trans-sphincteric anal fistula was present in 20 patients and an intersphincteric fistula was present in 11 patients. There was a recurrence in 7 patients (22.5%): 1 patient (3.2%) after 1-month follow-up, 3 patients (9.7%) after 3-month follow-up, 2 patients (6.5%) after 6-month follow-up, and 1 patient (3.2%) after 12-month follow-up. A complete recovery was observed in 24 (77.5%) patients after a 12-month follow-up. The mean Fecal Incontinence Severity Index score was 0.29 ± 0.64 preoperatively and 0.55 ± 1.03 after 12 months.

Conclusion

In this study, we show that treatment of patients with an anal fistula by injection of Permacol™ is a safe and successful method that does not compromise continence.

Keywords

Anal fistula Biomaterials Incontinence Permacol Recurrence 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the participants of the study.

Funding

No funding or sponsorship was received for this study or publication of this article. The article processing charges were funded by the authors.

Authorship

All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given their approval for this version to be published.

Disclosures

Mehmet Bayrak and Yasemin Altıntas have nothing to disclose.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Written approval was obtained from Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine Clinical Ethical Board. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article as supplementary information files.

Supplementary material

12325_2018_743_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (11 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 11 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Ommer A, Herold A, Berg E, et al. Cryptoglandular anal fistulas. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011;108(42):707–13.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Giamundo P, Geraci M, Tibaldi L, Valente M. Closure of fistula-in-ano with laser–FiLaC: an effective novel sphincter-saving procedure for complex disease. Colorectal Dis. 2014;16(2):110–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haim N, Neufeld D, Ziv Y, et al. Long-term results of fibrin glue treatment for cryptogenic perianal fistulas: a multicenter study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(10):1279–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mishra A, Shah S, Nar AS, Bawa A. The role of fibrin glue in the treatment of high and low fistulas in ano. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(5):876–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sileri P, Giarratano G, Franceschilli L, et al. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT): a minimally invasive procedure for complex anal fistula: two-year results of a prospective multicentric study. Surg Innov. 2014;21(5):476–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cintron JR, Park JJ, Orsay CP, Pearl RK, Nelson RL, Abcarian H. Repair of fistulas-in-ano using autologous fibrin tissue adhesive. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42(5):607–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cintron JR, Park JJ, Orsay CP, et al. Repair of fistulas-in-ano using fibrin adhesive: long-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43(7):944–9 (discussion 949–50).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sentovich SM. Fibrin glue for all anal fistulas. J Gastrointest Surg. 2001;5(2):158–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dietz DW. Role of fibrin glue in the management of simple and complex fistula in ano. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10(5):631–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gisbertz SS, Sosef MN, Festen S, Gerhards MF. Treatment of fistulas in ano with fibrin glue. Dig Surg. 2005;22(1–2):91–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Singer M, Cintron J, Nelson R, et al. Treatment of fistulas-in-ano with fibrin sealant in combination with intra-adhesive antibiotics and/or surgical closure of the internal fistula opening. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(4):799–808.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Garcia-Olmo D, Herreros D, Pascual I, et al. Expanded adipose-derived stem cells for the treatment of complex perianal fistula: a phase II clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(1):79–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Herreros MD, Garcia-Arranz M, Guadalajara H, De-La-Quintana P, Garcia-Olmo D, Group FC. Autologous expanded adipose-derived stem cells for the treatment of complex cryptoglandular perianal fistulas: a phase III randomized clinical trial (FATT 1: Fistula Advanced Therapy Trial 1) and long-term evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(7):762–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fabiani B, Menconi C, Martellucci J, Giani I, Toniolo G, Naldini G. Permacol collagen paste injection for the treatment of complex anal fistula: 1-year follow-up. Tech Coloproctol. 2017;21(3):211–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Giordano P, Sileri P, Buntzen S, et al. Final results of a European, multi-centre, prospective, observational Study of Permacol™ collagen paste injection for the treatment of anal fistula. Colorectal Dis. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13715.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Whiteford MH, Kilkenny J 3rd, Hyman N, et al. Practice parameters for the treatment of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano (revised). Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(7):1337–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, et al. Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42(12):1525–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tozer P, Sala S, Cianci V, et al. Fistulotomy in the tertiary setting can achieve high rates of fistula cure with an acceptable risk of deterioration in continence. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(11):1960–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Westerterp M, Volkers NA, Poolman RW, van Tets WF. Anal fistulotomy between Skylla and Charybdis. Colorectal Dis. 2003;5(6):549–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ritchie RD, Sackier JM, Hodde JP. Incontinence rates after cutting seton treatment for anal fistula. Colorectal Dis. 2009;11(6):564–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Garg P, Song J, Bhatia A, Kalia H, Menon GR. The efficacy of anal fistula plug in fistula-in-ano: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12(10):965–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lewis R, Lunniss PJ, Hammond TM. Novel biological strategies in the management of anal fistula. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(12):1445–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jarman-Smith ML, Bodamyali T, Stevens C, Howell JA, Horrocks M, Chaudhuri JB. Porcine collagen crosslinking, degradation and its capability for fibroblast adhesion and proliferation. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2004;15(8):925–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Giordano P, Sileri P, Buntzen S, et al. A prospective multicentre observational study of Permacol collagen paste for anorectal fistula: preliminary results. Colorectal Dis. 2016;18(3):286–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stamos MJ, Snyder M, Robb BW, et al. A prospective multicenter study of a synthetic bioabsorbable anal fistula plug to treat cryptoglandular transsphincteric anal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58(3):344–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hammond TM, Porrett TR, Scott SM, Williams NS, Lunniss PJ. Management of idiopathic anal fistula using cross-linked collagen: a prospective phase 1 study. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13(1):94–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Himpson RC, Cohen CR, Sibbons P, Phillips RK. An experimentally successful new sphincter-conserving treatment for anal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(4):602–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sileri P, Franceschilli L, Del Vecchio Blanco G, Stolfi VM, Angelucci GP, Gaspari AL. Porcine dermal collagen matrix injection may enhance flap repair surgery for complex anal fistula. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26(3):345–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ellis CN, Rostas JW, Greiner FG. Long-term outcomes with the use of bioprosthetic plugs for the management of complex anal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(5):798–802.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Panés J, García-Olmo D, Van Assche G, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy (Cx601) for complex perianal fistulas in patients with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2018;154(5):1334–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Healthcare Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Adana Ozel Ortadogu HospitalAdanaTurkey

Personalised recommendations