Advances in Therapy

, Volume 34, Issue 8, pp 1918–1927 | Cite as

Assessing the Therapeutic Utility of Professional Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Type 2 Diabetes Across Various Therapies: A Retrospective Evaluation

  • Jothydev Kesavadev
  • Robert Vigersky
  • John Shin
  • Pradeep Babu Sadasivan Pillai
  • Arun Shankar
  • Geethu Sanal
  • Gopika Krishnan
  • Sunitha Jothydev
Original Research

Abstract

Background

There have been few large studies that have analyzed the effect of professional (masked) continuous glucose monitoring (P-CGM) on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) who were on a broad spectrum of baseline therapies.

Methods

We performed a retrospective, blinded evaluation of glycemic control in 296 T2DM adults for 6 months following a 6- to 7-day study of their glycemic profile using masked P-CGM. At baseline, 91% of the patients were on some form of insulin treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents (OHA), while 7% were on one or more OHAs without insulin, and the remaining 2% were on GLP-1RAs. On the basis of the masked CGM profile, patients were counselled on diet and exercise change(s) in their baseline diabetes therapy by our professionally trained diabetes team. They also continued to receive regular treatment advice and dose titrations through our Diabetes Tele-Management System (DTMS®). The baseline changes in hemoglobin A1C (A1C) observed in these patients after 6 months of undergoing P-CGM was compared to a matched control group.

Results

P-CGM revealed that the predominant pattern of hyperglycemia was postprandial while previously unknown hypoglycemia was found in 38% of the patients; over half of the cases of hypoglycemia were nocturnal. The mean A1C of the P-CGM group dropped from 7.5 ± 1.4% at baseline vs. 7.0 ± 0.9% at 6 months (p < 0.0001). The frequency of performing self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) was also found to be significantly increased in these patients from the baseline. Meanwhile, no significant improvement in A1C was noted in the control group during the same time frame (7.7 ± 1.1% at baseline vs. 7.4 ± 1.1% at 6 months; p = 0.0663) and frequency of SMBG remained almost unchanged.

Conclusions

P-CGM can provide actionable data and motivate patients for diabetes self-care practices, resulting in an improvement in glycemic control over a wide range of baseline therapies.

Keywords

A1C Continuous glucose monitoring Hypoglycemia Postprandial hyperglycemia Therapy change Type 2 diabetes 

References

  1. 1.
    Klonoff DC, Buckingham B, Christiansen JS, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(10):2968–79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grunberger G, Bailey T, Camacho PM, et al. Proceedings from the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology consensus conference on glucose monitoring. Endocr Pract. 2015;21(5):522–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2015: a patient-centered approach: update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(1):140–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Continuous Glucose Monitoring Summit - American Association of Diabetes Educators. 2015. https://www.diabeteseducator.org/docs/default-source/default-document-library/aade-2015-cgm-summit-white-paper-final.pdf?sfvrsn=0. Accessed 24 June 2017.
  5. 5.
    Liebl A, Henrichs HR, Heinemann L, Freckmann G, Biermann E, Thomas A. Continuous glucose monitoring: evidence and consensus statement for clinical use. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7(2):500–19.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Joubert M, Baillot-Rudoni S, Catargi B, et al. Indication, organization, practical implementation and interpretation guidelines for retrospective CGM recording: a French position statement. Diabetes Metab. 2015;41(6):498–508.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fonseca VA, Grunberger G, Anhalt H, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring: a consensus conference of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology. Endocr Pract. 2016;22(8):1008–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rodbard D, Bailey T, Jovanovic L, Zisser H, Kaplan R, Garg SK. Improved quality of glycemic control and reduced glycemic variability with use of continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009;11(11):717–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garg S, Jovanovic L. Relationship of fasting and hourly blood glucose levels to HbA1c values. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(12):2644–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Garg SK. The future of glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016;18(Suppl 2):S2-iv-S.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Poolsup N, Suksomboon N, Kyaw AM. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on glucose control in diabetes. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2013;5(1):39.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vigersky RA, Fonda SJ, Chellappa M, Walker MS, Ehrhardt NM. Short-and long-term effects of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(1):32–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Munshi MN, Segal AR, Suhl E, et al. Frequent hypoglycemia among elderly patients with poor glycemic control. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(4):362–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gehlaut RR, Dogbey GY, Schwartz FL, Marling CR, Shubrook JH. Hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes–more common than you think: a continuous glucose monitoring study. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015;9(5):999–1005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Allen NA, Fain JA, Braun B, Chipkin SR. Continuous glucose monitoring counseling improves physical activity behaviors of individuals with type 2 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008;80(3):371–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim SK, Kim HJ, Kim T, et al. Effectiveness of 3-day continuous glucose monitoring for improving glucose control in type 2 diabetic patients in clinical practice. Diabetes Metab J. 2014;38(6):449–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leinung M, Nardacci E, Patel N, Bettadahalli S, Paika K, Thompson S. Benefits of short-term professional continuous glucose monitoring in clinical practice. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013;15(9):744–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kesavadev J, Shankar A, Pillai PBS, Krishnan G, Jothydev S. Cost-effective use of telemedicine and self-monitoring of blood glucose via Diabetes Tele Management System (DTMS) to achieve target glycosylated hemoglobin values without serious symptomatic hypoglycemia in 1,000 subjects with Type 2 diabetes mellitus—a retrospective study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012;14(9):772–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bode BW, Schwartz S, Stubbs HA, Block JE. Glycemic characteristics in continuously monitored patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: normative values. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(10):2361–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Blackberry ID, Furler JS, Ginnivan LE, et al. An exploratory trial of basal and prandial insulin initiation and titration for type 2 diabetes in primary care with adjunct retrospective continuous glucose monitoring: INITIATION study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;106(2):247–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mohan V, Jain S, Kesavadev J, al. Use of retrospective continuous glucose monitoring for optimizing management of type 2 diabetes in India. J Assoc Physicians India. 2016;64:16–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hoeks L, Greven W, De Valk H. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring system for treatment of diabetes: a systematic review. Diabet Med. 2011;28(4):386–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pepper GM, Steinsapir J, Reynolds K. Effect of short-term iPRO continuous glucose monitoring on hemoglobin A1c levels in clinical practice. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012;14(8):654–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Healthcare Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jothydev Kesavadev
    • 1
  • Robert Vigersky
    • 2
  • John Shin
    • 3
  • Pradeep Babu Sadasivan Pillai
    • 1
  • Arun Shankar
    • 1
  • Geethu Sanal
    • 1
  • Gopika Krishnan
    • 1
  • Sunitha Jothydev
    • 1
  1. 1.Jothydev’s Diabetes Research CentreTrivandrumIndia
  2. 2.Medtronic DiabetesWashingtonUSA
  3. 3.Medtronic MiniMed Inc.NorthridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations