Advertisement

Advances in Therapy

, Volume 33, Issue 5, pp 824–833 | Cite as

Local Injection of Bone Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Fibrin Glue Promotes the Repair of Bone Atrophic Nonunion In Vivo

  • Chenguang Hao
  • Yanlong Wang
  • Lin Shao
  • Jianyu Liu
  • Lin Chen
  • Zhenyu ZhaoEmail author
Original Research

Abstract

Introduction

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of local injection of bone mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) and fibrin glue in the treatment of atrophic nonunion in an animal model.

Methods

Thirty-six male Lewis rats were randomly assigned into three groups: Group A (control group), Group B (atrophic nonunion group), and Group C (experimental group). All the rats underwent femoral osteotomy of the right hind limb, and stabilized with a custom-designed external fixator. Atrophic nonunion of the rats in Group B and C was induced by cauterization of the periosteum and bone marrow removal, and repaired by injection of fibrin glue and BMSCs-seeded fibrin glue, respectively. The surgically treated femurs were assessed by radiographic and histological analysis, and biomechanical test.

Results

During the follow-up period, the external fixator maintained correct placement and all the femurs retained normal positioning. Eight weeks postoperatively, atrophic nonunion was detected in Group B, with the presence of fibrous connective tissue in the osteotomy gap. The femurs in Group C demonstrated complete bony bridging of the osteotomy gap, with the formation of plenty of woven bone.

Conclusion

The repair of bone atrophic nonunion can be promoted through local injection of BMSCs and fibrin glue.

Keywords

Animal study Atrophic nonunion Bone mesenchymal stem cells External fixator Orthopedics Tissue engineering 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants from the Education Department of Heilongjiang Province, China (No. 12521269), The Health Department of Heilongjiang Province, China (No. 2012-595) and Harbin Municipal Science and Technology Bureau (No. 2013RFQYJ063). The article processing charges for this publication were funded by the authors. All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this manuscript, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given final approval for the version to be published.

Disclosures

Chenguang Hao, Yanlong Wang, Lin Shao, Jianyu Liu, Lin Chen, and Zhenyu Zhao have no conflict of interest to declare.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

The present study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Harbin Medical University.

References

  1. 1.
    Zhang H, Blunt L, Jiang X, et al. Femoral stem wear in cemented total hip replacement. Proc. IMechE, Part H. J Eng Med. 2008;222:583–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Watanabe Y, Arai Y, Takenaka N, Kobayashi M, Matsushita T. Three key factors affecting treatment results of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for delayed unions and nonunions: instability, gap size, and atrophic nonunion. J Orthop Sci. 2013;18:803–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang H, Brown L, Blunt L, Jiang X, Barrans S. Understanding initiation and propagation of fretting wear on the femoral stem in total hip replacement. Wear. 2009;266:566–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Oteo-Alvaro A, Moreno E. Atrophyc humeral shaft nonunion treated with teriparatide (rh PTH 1-34): a case report. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2010;19:22–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang H, Blunt L, Jiang X, Brown L, Barrans S. The influence of bone cement type on production of fretting wear on the femoral stem surface. Clin Biomech. 2012;27:666–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang H, Brown L, Blunt L, Jiang X, Barrans S. The contribution of the micropores in bone cement surface to generation of femoral stem wear in total hip replacement. Trib. Int. 2011;44:1476–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cavadas PC, Landin L. Treatment of recalcitrant distal tibial nonunion using the descending genicular corticoperiosteal free flap. J Trauma. 2008;64:144–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kurklu M, Yurttas Y, Kose O, et al. Adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the treatment of atrophic tibial nonunion with Ilizarov external fixator: a radiographic and scintigraphic study in rabbits. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2012;46:126–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fassbender M, Strobel C, Rauhe JS, et al. Local inhibition of angiogenesis results in an atrophic non-union in a rat osteotomy model. Eur Cell Mater. 2011;22:1–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mayr E, Mockl C, Lenich A. Is low intensity ultrasound effective in treatment of disorders of fracture healing. Unfallchirurg. 2002;105:108–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang CJ, Yang KD, Ko JY, et al. The effects of shockwave on bone healing and systemic concentrations of nitric oxide (NO), TGF-beta1, VEGF and BMP-2 in long bone non-unions. Nitric Oxide. 2009;20:298–303.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Allende C, Allende BT. The use of a new locking 90 degree blade plate in the treatment of atrophic proximal humerus nonunions. Int Orthop. 2009;33:1649–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Babhulkar S, Pande K. Nonunion of the diaphysis of long bones. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;431:50–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dhamangaonkar AC, Patankar HS. Treatment of atrophic nonunion of middle phalanx in a nine-year-old boy with external distraction and bone grafting. Hand Surg. 2014;19:449–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Paridis D, Karachalios T. Atrophic femoral bone nonunion treated with 1-84 PTH. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2011;11:320–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hak DJ, Makino T, Niikura T, et al. Recombinant human BMP-7 effectively prevents non-union in both young and old rats. J Orthop Res. 2006;24:11–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lin EA, Liu CJ, Monroy A, Khurana S, Egol KA. Prevention of atrophic nonunion by the systemic administration of parathyroid hormone (PTH 1-34) in an experimental animal model. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26:719–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mathieu M, Rigutto S, Ingels, et al. Decreased pool of mesenchymal stem cells is associated with altered chemokines serum levels in atrophic nonunion fractures. Bone. 2013;53:391–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gopal K, Amirhamed HA, Kamarul T. Advances of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of cartilage defects: a systematic review. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2014;239:663–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee KB, Hui JH, Song IC, Ardany L, Lee EH. Injectable mesenchymal stem cell therapy for large cartilage defects: a porcine model. Stem Cells. 2007;25:2964–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li YH, Wang ZD, Wang W, Ding CW, Zhang HX, Li JM. The biocompatibility of calcium phosphate cements containing alendronate-loaded PLGA microparticles in vitro. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2015;240:1465–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhao ZY, Hao CG, Zhao HM, Liu JY, Shao L. Injectable allogeneic bone mesenchymal stem cells: a potential minimally invasive therapy for atrophic nonunion. Med Hypotheses. 2011;77:912–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhao ZY, Yang DP, Ma X, et al. Successful repair of a critical-sized bone defect in the rat femur with a newly developed external fixator. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2009;219:115–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kaspar K, Matziolis G, Strube P, et al. A new animal model for bone atrophic nonunion: fixation by external fixator. J Orthop Res. 2008;26:1649–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Giannoudis PV, Kanakaris NK, Dimitriou R, et al. The synergistic effect of autograft and BMP-7 in the treatment of atrophic nonunions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:3239–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Giannotti S, Bottai V, Dell’Osso G, et al. Atrophic femoral nonunion successfully treated with teriparatide. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013;23(Suppl 2):291–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Crawford CH 3rd, Seligson D. Atrophic nonunion of humeral diaphysis treated with locking plate and recombinant bone morphogenetic protein: nine cases. Am J Orthop. 2009;38:567–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Harrison LJ, Cunningham JL, Stromberg L, Goodship AE. Controlled induction of a pseudarthrosis: a study using a rodent model. J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17:11–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Oetgen ME, Merrell GA, Troiano NW, Horowitz MC, Kacena MA. Development of a femoral non-union model in the mouse. Injury. 2008;39:1119–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kruyt M, De Bruijn J, Rouwkema J, et al. Analysis of the dynamics of bone formation, effect of cell seeding density, and potential of allogeneic cells in cell-based bone tissue engineering in goats. Tissue Eng Part A. 2008;14:1081–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Proulx MK, Carey SP, Ditroia LM, et al. Fibrin microthreads support mesenchymal stem cell growth while maintaining differentiation potential. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2011;96:301–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yamada Y, Boo JS, Ozawa R, et al. Bone regeneration following injection of mesenchymal stem cells and fibrin glue with a biodegradable scaffold. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2003;31:27–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Healthcare 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chenguang Hao
    • 1
  • Yanlong Wang
    • 1
  • Lin Shao
    • 1
  • Jianyu Liu
    • 1
  • Lin Chen
    • 1
  • Zhenyu Zhao
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of OrthopaedicsThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical UniversityHarbinChina

Personalised recommendations