Advances in Therapy

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 345–356 | Cite as

Review of the Clinical and Economic Burden of Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Renal Transplant Recipients

  • Gorden Muduma
  • Isaac Odeyemi
  • Jayne Smith-Palmer
  • Richard F. Pollock
Review

Abstract

Antibody-mediated rejection (AbMR) is a leading cause of late graft loss in kidney transplant recipients, accounting for up to 60% of late graft failures. AbMR manifests as two distinct phenotypes: the first occurs in the immediate post-transplant period in sensitized patients; the second occurs in the late post-transplant period and has been associated with non-adherence to immunosuppression. The present review summarizes the current treatment options for AbMR, its clinical and economic burden, and approaches for reducing the risk of AbMR. While AbMR is typically refractory to treatment with corticosteroids, there are numerous other approaches focused on removal, inhibition or neutralization of donor-specific antibodies, or inhibition of complement-mediated allograft damage. AbMR treatment is generally expensive with one US study reporting costs of USD 49,000–155,000 per episode. However, leaving AbMR untreated puts patients at high risk of capillaritis, microangiopathy, necrosis and graft failure, which may ultimately result in much greater costs associated with a return to dialysis. Given the barriers to treatment, which include the high cost and the fact that pharmacologic treatments are currently used off-label, prevention of AbMR is important, with improvement in patient adherence to immunosuppression a key strategic approach that may be worthy of further evaluation.

Funding: Astellas Pharma EMEA Limited.

Keywords

Burden Cost Graft rejection Nephrology Renal transplant 

Supplementary material

12325_2016_292_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (270 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 269 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, et al. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(23):1725–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jofré R, López-Gómez JM, Moreno F, Sanz-Guajardo D, Valderrábano F. Changes in quality of life after renal transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998;32(1):93–100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sánchez-Escuredo A, Alsina A, Diekmann F, et al. Economic analysis of the treatment of end-stage renal disease treatment: living-donor kidney transplantation versus hemodialysis. Transpl Proc. 2015;47(1):30–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jensen CE, Sørensen P, Petersen KD. In Denmark kidney transplantation is more cost-effective than dialysis. Dan Med J. 2014;61(3):A4796.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    NHS Blood and Transplant. Activity report 2014–2015. http://nhsbtmediaservices.blob.core.windows.net/organdonation-assets/pdfs/activity_report_2014_15.pdf. Last accessed 11 Sept 2015.
  6. 6.
    Sellarés J, de Freitas DG, Mengel M, et al. Understanding the causes of kidney transplant failure: the dominant role of antibody-mediated rejection and nonadherence. Am J Transpl. 2012;12(2):388–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Réseau Epidémiologie Information Néphrologie. Annual report 2012. http://www.agence-biomedecine.fr/IMG/pdf/rapport_rein_vdef_2012.pdf. Last accessed 11 March 2015.
  8. 8.
    Halloran PF, de Freitas DG, Einecke G, et al. An integrated view of molecular changes, histopathology and outcomes in kidney transplants. Am J Transplant. 2010;10(10):2223–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Einecke G, Sis B, Reeve J, et al. Antibody-mediated microcirculation injury is the major cause of late kidney transplant failure. Am J Transplant. 2009;9(11):2520–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gaston RS, Cecka JM, Kasiske BL, et al. Evidence for antibody-mediated injury as a major determinant of late kidney allograft failure. Transplantation. 2010;90(1):68–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Djamali A, Kaufman DB, Ellis TM, Zhong W, Matas A, Samaniego M. Diagnosis and management of antibody-mediated rejection: current status and novel approaches. Am J Transpl. 2014;14(2):255–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mengel M, Sis B, Haas M, et al. Banff 2011 meeting report: new concepts in antibody-mediated rejection. Am J Transpl. 2012;12(3):563–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haas M, Sis B, Racusen LC, et al. Banff 2013 meeting report: inclusion of c4d-negative antibody-mediated rejection and antibody-associated arterial lesions. Am J Transpl. 2014;14(2):272–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Takemoto SK, Zeevi A, Feng S, et al. National conference to assess antibody-mediated rejection in solid organ transplantation. Am J Transpl. 2004;4(7):1033–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mauiyyedi S, Crespo M, Collins AB, et al. Acute humoral rejection in kidney transplantation: II. Morphology, immunopathology, and pathologic classification. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13(3):779–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Puttarajappa C, Shapiro R, Tan HP. Antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation: a review. J Transpl. 2012;2012:193724.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Transplant Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients. Suppl 3. 2009;9:S1–157.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    British Transplantation Society. Clinical Practice Guidelines. Post-operative care of the Kidney Transplant Recipient. February 2011. http://www.renal.org/docs/default-source/guidelines-resources/Post-operative_care_of_the_kidney_transplant_recipient_-_Final_Version-_05_February_2011.pdf?sfvrsn=0. Last accessed 25 March 2015.
  19. 19.
    Kristinsson SY, Gridley G, Hoover RN, Check D, Landgren O. Long-term risks after splenectomy among 8,149 cancer-free American veterans: a cohort study with up to 27 years follow-up. Haematologica. 2014;99(2):392–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hychko G, Mirhosseini A, Parhizgar A, Ghahramani N. A systematic review and meta-analysis of rituximab in antibody-mediated renal allograft rejection. Int J Organ Transpl Med. 2011;2(2):51–6.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sautenet B, Blancho G, Büchler M, et al. One-year results of the effects of rituximab on acute antibody-mediated rejection in renal transplantation: RITUX ERAH, a multicenter double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. Transplantation. 2015;. doi:10.1097/TP.0000000000000958.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nigos JG, Arora S, Nath P, et al. Treatment of antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients: a single-center experience with a bortezomib-based regimen. Exp Clin Transpl. 2012;10(6):609–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tzvetanov I, Spaggiari M, Joseph J, et al. The use of bortezomib as a rescue treatment for acute antibody-mediated rejection: report of three cases and review of literature. Transpl Proc. 2012;44(10):2971–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sureshkumar KK, Hussain SM, Marcus RJ, et al. Proteasome inhibition with bortezomib: an effective therapy for severe antibody mediated rejection after renal transplantation. Clin Nephrol. 2012;77(3):246–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Flechner SM, Fatica R, Askar M, et al. The role of proteasome inhibition with bortezomib in the treatment of antibody-mediated rejection after kidney-only or kidney-combined organ transplantation. Transplantation. 2010;90(12):1486–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rother RP, Rollins SA, Mojcik CF, Brodsky RA, Bell L. Discovery and development of the complement inhibitor eculizumab for the treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25(11):1256–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stegall MD, Diwan T, Raghavaiah S, et al. Terminal complement inhibition decreases antibody-mediated rejection in sensitized renal transplant recipients. Am J Transpl. 2011;11(11):2405–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    González-Roncero F, Suñer M, Bernal G, et al. Eculizumab treatment of acute antibody-mediated rejection in renal transplantation: case reports. Transpl Proc. 2012;44(9):2690–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    NHS England. Clinical Commissioning Policy: Eculizumab for the treatment of refractory antibody mediated rejection post kidney transplant. January 2014. http://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Eculizumab.pdf. Last accessed 12 March 2015.
  30. 30.
    United States Food and Drug Administration prescribing information for rituximab. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2014/103705s5432lbl.pdf. Last accessed 11 March 2015.
  31. 31.
    United States Food and Drug Administration prescribing information for eculizumab. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2014/125166s368s380lbl.pdf. Last accessed 11 March 2015.
  32. 32.
    Edinburgh Renal Unit. Transplant Handbook. Treatment of acute antibody-mediated rejection. http://www.edren.org/pages/handbooks/transplant-handbook/immunosuppression-protocol/treatment-of-acute-antibody-mediated-rejection.php. Last accessed 25 March 2015.
  33. 33.
    Roberts DM, Jiang SH, Chadban SJ. The treatment of acute antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients-a systematic review. Transplantation. 2012;94(8):775–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Burton SA, Amir N, Asbury A, Lange A, Hardinger KL. Treatment of antibody-mediated rejection in renal transplant patients: a clinical practice survey. Clin Transpl. 2015;29(2):118–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Archdeacon P, Chan M, Neuland C, et al. Summary of FDA antibody-mediated rejection workshop. Am J Transpl. 2011;11(5):896–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Irish W, Boscoe A, Ryan MP, Iloeje U, Gunnarsson C, Marks W. Economic burden of antibody mediated rejection following kidney transplantation: comparative analysis using the premier hospital database. Value Health. 2015;18(3):A187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Vo AA, Petrozzino J, Yeung K, et al. Efficacy, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness of desensitization using IVIG and rituximab. Transplantation. 2013;95(6):852–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Marfo K, Lu A, Ling M, Akalin E. Desensitization protocols and their outcome. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6(4):922–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tanriover B, Wright SE, Foster SV, et al. High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab treatment for antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation: a cost analysis. Transpl Proc. 2008;40(10):3393–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kim M, Martin ST, Townsend KR, Gabardi S. Antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation: a review of pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment options. Pharmacotherapy. 2014;34(7):733–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Muduma G, Odeyemi I, Pollock RF. Evaluating the economic implications of non-adherence and antibody-mediated rejection in renal transplant recipients: the role of once-daily tacrolimus in the UK. J Med Econ. 2015;18(12):1050–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Biesenbach P, Kain R, Derfler K, et al. Long-term outcome of anti-glomerular basement membrane antibody disease treated with immunoadsorption. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e103568.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Morath C, Beimler J, Opelz G, et al. Living donor kidney transplantation in crossmatch-positive patients enabled by peritransplant immunoadsorption and anti-CD20 therapy. Transpl Int. 2012;25(5):506–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gubensek J, Buturovic-Ponikvar J, Kandus A, et al. Plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation: a single-center historic cohort study. Transpl Proc. 2013;45(4):1524–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Willicombe M, Roufosse C, Brookes P, et al. Antibody-mediated rejection after alemtuzumab induction: incidence, risk factors, and predictors of poor outcome. Transplantation. 2011;92(2):176–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Schwartzberg LS, Stepanski EJ, Fortner BV, Houts AC. Retrospective chart review of severe infusion reactions with rituximab, cetuximab, and bevacizumab in community oncology practices: assessment of clinical consequences. Support Care Cancer. 2008;16(4):393–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    NHS England. Clinical Commissioning Policy: Bortezomib for the treatment of refractory antibody mediated rejection post kidney transplant. January 2014. http://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/bortezomib.pdf. Last accessed 31 July 2015.
  48. 48.
    Levine MH, Abt PL. Treatment options and strategies for antibody mediated rejection after renal transplantation. Semin Immunol. 2012;24(2):136–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Cornell LD, Schinstock CA, Gandhi MJ, Kremers WK, Stegall MD. Positive crossmatch kidney transplant recipients treated with eculizumab: outcomes beyond 1 year. Am J Transplant. 2015. doi:10.1111/ajt.13168. [Epub ahead of print].
  50. 50.
    Tait BD, Süsal C, Gebel HM, et al. Consensus guidelines on the testing and clinical management issues associated with HLA and non-HLA antibodies in transplantation. Transplantation. 2013;95(1):19–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Dharancy S, Giral M, Tetaz R, Fatras M, Dubel L, Pageaux GP. Adherence with immunosuppressive treatment after transplantation: results from the French trial PREDICT. Clin Transpl. 2012;26(3):E293–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Weng FL, Israni AK, Joffe MM, et al. Race and electronically measured adherence to immunosuppressive medications after deceased donor renal transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16(6):1839–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Morales JM, Varo E, Lázaro P. Immunosuppressant treatment adherence, barriers to adherence and quality of life in renal and liver transplant recipients in Spain. Clin Transpl. 2012;26(2):369–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ichimaru N, Kakuta Y, Abe T, et al. Treatment adherence in renal transplant recipients: a questionnaire survey on immunosuppressants. Transpl Proc. 2008;40(5):1362–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Guirado L, Cantarell C, Franco A, et al. Efficacy and safety of conversion from twice-daily to once-daily tacrolimus in a large cohort of stable kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transpl. 2011;11(9):1965–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Kuypers DR, Peeters PC, Sennesael JJ, et al. Improved adherence to tacrolimus once-daily formulation in renal recipients: a randomized controlled trial using electronic monitoring. Transplantation. 2013;95(2):333–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Mohty M. Mechanisms of action of antithymocyte globulin: T-cell depletion and beyond. Leukemia. 2007;21(7):1387–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Shah A, Nadasdy T, Arend L, et al. Treatment of C4d-positive acute humoral rejection with plasmapheresis and rabbit polyclonal antithymocyte globulin. Transplantation. 2004;77(9):1399–405.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Kaposztas Z, Podder H, Mauiyyedi S, et al. Impact of rituximab therapy for treatment of acute humoral rejection. Clin Transpl. 2009;23(1):63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Everly MJ, Everly JJ, Susskind B, et al. Bortezomib provides effective therapy for antibody- and cell-mediated acute rejection. Transplantation. 2008;86(12):1754–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Biglarnia AR, Nilsson B, Nilsson T, et al. Prompt reversal of a severe complement activation by eculizumab in a patient undergoing intentional ABO-incompatible pancreas and kidney transplantation. Transpl Int. 2011;24(8):e61–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Healthcare 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gorden Muduma
    • 1
  • Isaac Odeyemi
    • 1
  • Jayne Smith-Palmer
    • 2
  • Richard F. Pollock
    • 2
  1. 1.Astellas Pharma EMEA LimitedChertseyUK
  2. 2.Ossian Health Economics and CommunicationsBaselSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations