Advertisement

Advances in Therapy

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 306–318 | Cite as

Efficacy and Safety of Empagliflozin Monotherapy for 52 Weeks in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Study

  • Takashi Kadowaki
  • Masakazu Haneda
  • Nobuya Inagaki
  • Yasuo Terauchi
  • Atsushi Taniguchi
  • Kazuki KoiwaiEmail author
  • Henning Rattunde
  • Hans J. Woerle
  • Uli C. Broedl
Original Research

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of empagliflozin monotherapy for 52 weeks in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

Methods

In a 12-week dose-finding period, patients [N = 547; mean baseline glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) 7.92–8.02%] received empagliflozin (5, 10, 25, or 50 mg) or placebo. In a 40-week extension period, patients on empagliflozin 10 or 25 mg continued the same treatment and patients on other doses were reallocated to empagliflozin 10 or 25 mg. Outcomes at week 52 included changes from baseline in HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), weight and blood pressure (BP) in patients who received empagliflozin 10 or 25 mg in both the initial 12 weeks and the extension and safety in patients treated with ≥1 dose of empagliflozin 10 or 25 mg.

Results

Adjusted mean ± SE changes in HbA1c from baseline at week 52 were –0.67 ± 0.09% and −0.86 ± 0.09%, in FPG were −24.7 ± 3.2 mg/dL and −31.3 ± 3.4 mg/dL, and in body weight were −3.1 ± 0.4 kg and −3.1 ± 0.4 kg, with empagliflozin 10 and 25 mg, respectively. Both doses reduced systolic and diastolic BP. Adverse events were reported in 70.8% and 66.8% of patients on empagliflozin 10 and 25 mg, respectively. Confirmed hypoglycemic adverse events (plasma glucose ≤70 mg/dL and/or requiring assistance) were reported in one patient per group.

Conclusion

Empagliflozin monotherapy for 52 weeks led to sustained reductions in HbA1c, FPG, weight and BP and was well tolerated in Japanese patients with T2DM.

Funding

Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly and Company.

Keywords

Empagliflozin Japanese Monotherapy Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2 inhibitor) Type 2 diabetes 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Sponsorship and article processing charges for this study were funded by Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly and Company. Medical writing assistance, funded by Boehringer Ingelheim, was provided by Clare Ryles and Elizabeth Ng of Fleishman-Hillard Group, Ltd. during the preparation of this manuscript. The authors were fully responsible for all content and editorial decisions at all stages of manuscript development and have approved the final version. These data have been presented in poster format at the 49th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), 23–27 September 2013, Barcelona, Spain, the Annual Congress of the Taiwanese Diabetes Association (TDA), 23–24 March 2014, Taiwan, and the 57th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Diabetes Society (JDS), 22–24 May 2014, Osaka, Japan. In addition, these data have been published in abstract form in a supplement of Diabetologia (Diabetologia 2013; 56 (suppl 1): S371–S372 [930]). All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this manuscript, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given final approval for the version to be published.

Conflict of interest

Takashi Kadowaki has participated on advisory panels for Takeda, Daiichi-Sankyo, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Taisho, Boehringer Ingelheim and Novo Nordisk, has received honoraria for lectures from Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Astellas, Takeda, Kowa, AstraZeneca, Dainippon-Sumitomo, Sanwa, Taisho, Eli Lilly and Company, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, MSD, Ono, Novartis and Sanofi, research support from Chugai, MSD, Ono, Daiichi-Sankyo, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Sanofi, AstraZeneca and Takeda, and scholarship grants from MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim, Takeda, Novo Nordisk and Terumo. Masakazu Haneda has received honoraria for lectures from Novo Nordisk, MSD, Novartis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Sanofi, Astellas, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Kowa, Taisho, Takeda and Boehringer Ingelheim, and research support from MSD, Daiichi-Sankyo, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Takeda, Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly and Company, Astellas and Boehringer Ingelheim. Nobuya Inagaki has participated on advisory panels for Daiichi-Sankyo, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Taisho and Boehringer Ingelheim, has received honoraria for lectures from MSD, Ono, Novartis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Taisho, Eli Lilly and Company, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Astellas, Kowa, Boehringer Ingelheim, and research support from MSD, Ono, Novartis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Taisho, Eli Lilly and Company, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Astellas, Bristol-Myers, Chugai and Boehringer Ingelheim. Yasuo Terauchi has received honoraria for lectures from MSD, Ono, Novartis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Eli Lilly and Company, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Kowa, Takeda, Sanwa, Novo Nordisk, Shionogi, Bayer and Boehringer Ingelheim, and research support from MSD, Ono, Novartis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Eli Lilly and Company, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Astellas, Takeda, Sanwa, Novo Nordisk, Dainippon-Sumitomo, Shionogi, Bayer, Pfizer and Boehringer Ingelheim. Atsushi Taniguchi is an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim. Kazuki Koiwai is an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim. Henning Rattunde is an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim. Hans J. Woerle is an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim. Uli C. Broedl is an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim.

Compliance with ethics guidelines

All procedures followed were in accordance with the International Conference on Harmonization Harmonized Tripartite Guideline for Good Clinical Practice, the Japanese GCP regulations (Ministry of Health and Welfare Ordinance No. 28, March 27, 1997), and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964, as revised in 2013. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Contributor statements

Takashi Kadowaki, Masakazu Haneda and Nobuya Inagaki contributed to the implementation of clinical trial and interpretation of data, Atsushi Taniguchi, Kazuki Koiwai, Hans J. Woerle and Uli C. Broedl contributed to the study design and interpretation of data and Yasuo Terauchi and Henning Rattunde contributed to the interpretation of data. All authors were involved with drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and all authors have approved the final version to be published.

Supplementary material

12325_2015_198_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (54 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 54.2 kb)
12325_2015_198_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (76 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 192 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Neville SE, Boye KS, Montgomery WS, et al. Diabetes in Japan: a review of disease burden and approaches to treatment. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2009;25:705–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Guariguata L, Whiting DR, Hambleton I, et al. Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2013 and projections for 2035. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;103:137–49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Japan Diabetes Society. Treatment guide for diabetes 2014–2015 (in Japanese). http://www.jds.or.jp/modules/en/index.php?content_id=34. Accessed Aug 1, 2014.
  4. 4.
    Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach: position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2012;35:1364–79.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grempler R, Thomas L, Eckhardt M, et al. Empagliflozin, a novel selective sodium glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor: characterisation and comparison with other SGLT-2 inhibitors. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012;14:83–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kanada S, Koiwai K, Taniguchi A, et al. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of 4 weeks’ treatment with empagliflozin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Investig. 2013;4:613–7.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Häring H-U, Merker L, Seewaldt-Becker E, et al. Empagliflozin as add-on to metformin plus sulfonylurea in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 24-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:3396–404.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Häring H-U, Merker L, Seewaldt-Becker E, et al. Empagliflozin as add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:1650–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kovacs CS, Seshiah V, Swallow R, et al. Empagliflozin improves glycaemic and weight control as add-on therapy to pioglitazone or pioglitazone plus metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 24-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014;16:147–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barnett AH, Mithal A, Manassie J, et al. Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin added to existing antidiabetes treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2:369–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roden M, Weng J, Eilbracht J, et al. Empagliflozin monotherapy with sitagliptin as an active comparator in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2013;1:208–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kadowaki T, Haneda M, Inagaki N, et al. Empagliflozin monotherapy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase II trial. Adv Ther. 2014;31:621–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Matsuo S, Imai E, Horio M, et al. Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;53:982–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    DeFronzo RA, Davidson JA, Del Prato S. The role of the kidneys in glucose homeostasis: a new path towards normalizing glycaemia. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012;14:5–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Baker WL, Smyth LR, Riche DM, et al. Effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2014;8:262–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cherney DZ, Perkins BA, Soleymanlou N, et al. The effect of empagliflozin on arterial stiffness and heart rate variability in subjects with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014;13:28.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fujioka K. Benefits of moderate weight loss in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2010;12:186–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, et al. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002;360:1903–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Saito I. Epidemiological evidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular disease in Japan. Circ J. 2012;76:1066–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kaku K, Inoue S, Matsuoka O, et al. Efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin as a monotherapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus in Japanese patients with inadequate glycaemic control: a phase II multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15:432–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tanizawa Y, Kaku K, Araki E, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of tofogliflozin, a selective inhibitor of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2, as monotherapy or in combination with other oral antidiabetic agents in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trials. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2014;15:749–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Inagaki N, Kondo K, Yoshinari T, et al. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15:1136–45.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Healthcare 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takashi Kadowaki
    • 1
  • Masakazu Haneda
    • 2
  • Nobuya Inagaki
    • 3
  • Yasuo Terauchi
    • 4
  • Atsushi Taniguchi
    • 5
  • Kazuki Koiwai
    • 5
    Email author
  • Henning Rattunde
    • 6
  • Hans J. Woerle
    • 6
  • Uli C. Broedl
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Diabetes and Metabolic DiseasesGraduate School of Medicine, The University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of MedicineAsahikawa Medical UniversityAsahikawaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and NutritionGraduate School of Medicine, Kyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  4. 4.Department of Endocrinology and MetabolismYokohama City University, Graduate School of MedicineKanagawaJapan
  5. 5.Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd.TokyoJapan
  6. 6.Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KGIngelheimGermany

Personalised recommendations