Advertisement

Advances in Therapy

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 249–266 | Cite as

Exploring Channeling Optimized Radiofrequency Energy: a Review of Radiofrequency History and Applications in Esthetic Fields

  • Inna BelenkyEmail author
  • Ariel Margulis
  • Monica Elman
  • Udi Bar-Yosef
  • Silviu D. Paun
Original Research

Abstract

Introduction

Because of its high efficiency and safety, radiofrequency (RF) energy is widely used in the dermatological field for heating biological tissue in various esthetic applications, including skin tightening, skin lifting, body contouring, and cellulite reduction. This paper reviews the literature on the use of nonablative RF energy in the esthetic field and its scientific background. The purpose of this article is to describe in detail the extensive use of medical devices based on RF technology, the development of these medical devices over the years, and recent developments and trends in RF technology.

Methods

The authors conducted a systematic search of publications that address safety and efficacy issues, technical system specifications, and clinical techniques. Finally, the authors focused on their own clinical experiences with the use of patented Channeling Optimized RF Energy technique and mechanical massage. An in-vivo study was conducted in domestic pigs, with a thermal video camera. Twenty-seven female patients participated in a cellulite and body shaping study. The treatments were conducted according to a three-phase protocol. An additional 16 females participated in a skin tightening case study. All of the patients underwent three treatment sessions at 3-week intervals, each according to a protocol specific to the area being treated.

Results

The review of the literature on RF-based systems revealed that these systems are safe, with low risks for potential side effects, and effective for cellulite, body contouring, and skin tightening procedures. The in-vivo measurements confirmed the theory that the penetration depth of RF is an inverse function of its frequency, and using a vacuum mechanism makes an additional contribution to the RF energy penetration. The heating effect of RF was also found to increase blood circulation and to induce collagen remodeling. The results from the cellulite and body shaping treatments showed an overall average improvement of 55% in the appearance of cellulite, with an average circumferential reduction of 3.31 cm in the buttocks, 2.94 cm in the thighs, and 2.14 cm in the abdomen. The results from the skin tightening procedure showed moderate improvement of skin appearance in 50% and significant improvement in 31%. At the follow-up visits the results were found to be sustained without any significant side effects.

Conclusion

Of all tissue heating techniques, RF-based technologies appear to be the most established and clinically proven. The design and specifications of the described vacuumassisted bipolar RF device fall within the range of the specifications currently prescribed for esthetic, nonablative RF systems.

Keywords

Body contouring Cellulite Radiofrequency Radiofrequency energy Skin tightening Vacuum 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Franco W, Kothare A, Ronan SJ, Grekin RC, McCalmont TH. Hyperthermic injury to adipocyte cells by selective heating of subcutaneous fat with a novel radiofrequency device: feasibility studies. Lasers Surg Med. 2010;42;361–370.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stuchly MA, Stuchly SS. Electrical properties of biological substances. In: Gandhi OP, ed. Biological Effects and Medical Applications of Electromagnetic Energy. Chapter 5. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1990:76–112.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gabriel S, Lau RW, Gabriel C. The dielectric properties of biological tissues: III. Parametric models for the dielectric spectrum of tissues. Phys Med Biol. 1996;41:2271–2293.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sadick NS, Makino Y. Selective electro-thermolysis in aesthetic medicine: a review. Lasers Surg Med. 2004;34:91–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sung RJ, Lauer MR. Fundamental approaches to the management of cardiac arrhythmias. New York, NY: Springer; 2000:153.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shiffman MA, Mirrafati SJ, Lam SM, Cueteaux CG. Simplified facial rejuvenation. New York, NY: Springer; 2007;157.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carruthers A. Radiofrequency resurfacing: technique and clinical review. Facial Plast Surg Clin N Am. 2001;9:311–319.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lopez MJ, Hayashi K, Fanton GS, Thabit G III, Markel MD. The effect of radiofrequency energy on the ultra-structure of joint capsular collagen. Arthroscopy. 1998;14:495–501.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Access data. Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf2/K021402.pdf Last accessed: January 27, 2012.
  10. 10.
    U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Access data. Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf9/K090221.pdf. Last accessed: January 27, 2012.
  11. 11.
    Arnoczky SP, Aksan A. Thermal modification of connective tissues: basic science considerations and clinical implications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000;8:305–313.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hiragami F, Motoda H, Takezawa T, et al. Heat shock-induced three-dimensional-like proliferation of normal human fibroblasts mediated by pressed silk. Int J Mol Sci. 2009;10:4963–4976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hjelmdahl P, Linde B. Adrenergic control of blood flow and lipolysis in human adipose tissue. In: Refsum H, Mjos OD, eds. Alpha-Adrenoceptor Blockers in Cardiovascular Disease. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1985:151–164.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Galitzky J, Lafontan M, Nordenstrom J, Arner P. Role of vascular alpha-2 adrenoceptors in regulating lipid mobilization from human adipose tissue. J Clin Invest. 1993;91:1997–2003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hsu TS, Kaminer MS. The use of nonablative radiofrequency technology to tighten the lower face and neck. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2003;22:115–123.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fitzpatrick R, Geronemus R, Goldberg D, Kaminer M, Kilmer S, Ruiz-Esparza J. Multicenter study of noninvasive radiofrequency for periorbital tissue tightening. Lasers Surg Med. 2003;33:232–242.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Abraham MT, Chiang SK, Keller GS, Rawnsley JD, Blackwell KE, Elashoff DA. Clinical evaluation of non-ablative radiofrequency facial rejuvenation. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2004;6:136–144.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fritz M, Counters JT, Zelickson BD. Radiofrequency treatment for middle and lower face laxity. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004;6:370–373.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Del Pino E, Rosado RH, Azuela A, et al. Effect of controlled volumetric tissue heating with radiofrequency on cellulite and the subcutaneous tissue of the buttocks and thighs. J Drugs Dermatol. 2006;5:714–722.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Friedman DJ, Gilead LT. The use of hybrid radiofrequency device for the treatment of rhytides and lax skin. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33:543–551.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ikomi F, Schmid-Schonbein GW. Lymph transport in the skin. Clin Dermatol. 1995;13:419–427.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Monteux C, Lafontan M. Use of the microdialysis technique to assess lipolytic responsiveness of femoral adipose tissue after 12 sessions of mechanical massage technique. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008;22;1465–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gold MH, Goldman MP, Rao J, Carcamo AS, Ehrlich M. Treatment of wrinkles and elastosis using vacuum-assisted bipolar radiofrequency heating of the dermis. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33:300–309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Montesi G, Calvieri S, Balzani A, Gold MH. Bipolar radiofrequency in the treatment of dermatologic imperfections:clinicopathological and immunohistochemical aspects. J Drugs Dermatol. 2007;6:890–896.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Weiss RA, Weiss MA, Munavalli G, Beasley KL. Monopolar radiofrequency facial tightening: a retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety in over 600 treatments. J Drugs Dermatol. 2006;5:707–712.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Narins RS, Tope WD, Pope K, Ross EV. Overtreatment effects associated with a radiofrequency tissue-tightening device: rare, preventable, and correctable with subcision and autologous fat transfer. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32:115–124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Duck FA. Physical properties of tissue. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1990:173.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lee TL, Lin YC, Mochitate K, Grinnell F. Stressrelaxation of fibroblasts in collagen matrices triggers ectocytosis of plasma membrane vesicles containing actin, annexins II and VI, and b1 integrin receptors. J Cell Sci. 1993;105:167–177.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kim SG, Akaike T, Sasagaw T, Atomi Y, Kurosawa H. Gene expression of type I and type III collagen by mechanical stretch in anterior cruciate ligament cells. Cell Struct Funct. 2002;27:139–144.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Healthcare 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Inna Belenky
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ariel Margulis
    • 1
  • Monica Elman
    • 2
  • Udi Bar-Yosef
    • 3
  • Silviu D. Paun
    • 4
  1. 1.Clinical DepartmentViora, Inc.Jersey CityUSA
  2. 2.Beit Harofim Medical CenterHolonIsrael
  3. 3.Institute for Animal ResearchKibbutz LahavIsrael
  4. 4.Keren-Or Medical Esthetic CenterAfulaIsrael

Personalised recommendations