Advertisement

The Cerebellum

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 610–627 | Cite as

Longitudinal Preterm Cerebellar Volume: Perinatal and Neurodevelopmental Outcome Associations

  • Lillian G. Matthews
  • T. E. Inder
  • L. Pascoe
  • K. Kapur
  • K. J. Lee
  • B. B. Monson
  • L. W. Doyle
  • D. K. Thompson
  • P. J. Anderson
Original Paper

Abstract

Impaired cerebellar development is an important determinant of adverse motor and cognitive outcomes in very preterm (VPT) infants. However, longitudinal MRI studies investigating cerebellar maturation from birth through childhood and associated neurodevelopmental outcomes are lacking. We aimed to compare cerebellar volume and growth from term-equivalent age (TEA) to 7 years between VPT (< 30 weeks’ gestation or < 1250 g) and full-term children; and to assess the association between these measures, perinatal factors, and 7-year outcomes in VPT children, and whether these relationships varied by sex. In a prospective cohort study of 224 VPT and 46 full-term infants, cerebellar volumes were measured on MRI at TEA and 7 years. Useable data at either time-point were collected for 207 VPT and 43 full-term children. Cerebellar growth from TEA to 7 years was compared between VPT and full-term children. Associations with perinatal factors and 7-year outcomes were investigated in VPT children. VPT children had smaller TEA and 7-year volumes and reduced growth. Perinatal factors were associated with smaller cerebellar volume and growth between TEA and 7 years, namely, postnatal corticosteroids for TEA volume, and female sex, earlier birth gestation, white and deep nuclear gray matter injury for 7-year volume and growth. Smaller TEA and 7-year volumes, and reduced growth were associated with poorer 7-year IQ, language, and motor function, with differential relationships observed for male and female children. Our findings indicate that cerebellar growth from TEA to 7 years is impaired in VPT children and relates to early perinatal factors and 7-year outcomes.

Keywords

Brain Cerebellum Longitudinal studies Outcome assessment Premature birth Magnetic resonance imaging 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully thank Merilyn Bear for recruitment, Michael Kean and the radiographers at Melbourne Children’s MRI Centre, and the VIBeS and Developmental Imaging groups at the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute for their ideas and support, as well as the families and children who participated in this study. We also gratefully acknowledge Sara Cherkerzian for statistical input, and the contributions of Richard Beare, Divyen Shah, and Zohra Ahmadzai who generated the infant and 7-year cerebellar volumes.

Funding

This work was supported by Australia’s National Health and Medical Research Council (Centre for Clinical Research Excellence 546519 to LD, PA, and TI; Centre for Research Excellence 1060733 to LD, PA, and DT; Project grants 237117 to TI and LD, 491209 to PA, TI, LD, and DT; Senior Research Fellowship 1081288 to PA; Career Development Fellowship 1085754 to DT; Early Career Fellowship 1012236 to DT; Career Development Fellowship 1127984 to KJL), National Institutes of Health (HD058056), United Cerebral Palsy Foundation (USA), Leila Y. Mathers Charitable Foundation (USA), the Brown Foundation (USA), and the Victorian Government’s Operational Infrastructure Support Program. This work was further conducted with support from Harvard Catalyst | The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH Award UL1 TR001102) and financial contributions from Harvard University and its affiliated academic healthcare centers.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All phases of the study were approved by the Human Research Ethics Committees at The Royal Women’s Hospital and The Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

Informed Consent

Parental written informed consent was obtained for all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

12311_2018_946_MOESM1_ESM.docx (47 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 46.5 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Limperopoulos C. The vulnerable immature cerebellum. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;21(5):293–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Volpe JJ. Cerebellum of the premature infant: rapidly developing, vulnerable, clinically important. J Child Neurol. 2009;24(9):1085–104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Allin M, Matsumoto H, Santhouse AM, Nosarti C, AlAsady MHS, Stewart AL, et al. Cognitive and motor function and the size of the cerebellum in adolescents born very prematurely. Brain. 2001;124(1):60–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Limperopoulos C, Robertson RL, Sullivan NR, Bassan H, du Plessis AJ. Cerebellar injury in term infants: clinical characteristics, magnetic resonance imaging findings, and outcome. Pediatr Neurol. 2009;41(1):1–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Messerschmidt A, Fuiko R, Prayer D, Brugger P, Boltshauser E, Zoder G, et al. Disrupted cerebellar development in preterm infants is associated with impaired neurodevelopmental outcome. Eur J Pediatr. 2008;167(10):1141–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parker J, Mitchell A, Kalpakidou A, Walshe M, Jung HY, Nosarti C, et al. Cerebellar growth and behavioural & neuropsychological outcome in preterm adolescents. Brain. 2008;131(Pt 5):1344–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Spittle AJ, Doyle LW, Anderson PJ, Inder TE, Lee KJ, Boyd RN, et al. Reduced cerebellar diameter in very preterm infants with abnormal general movements. Early Hum Dev. 2010;86(1):1–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Limperopoulos C, Soul JS, Gauvreau K, Huppi PS, Warfield SK, Bassan H, et al. Late gestation cerebellar growth is rapid and impeded by premature birth. Pediatrics. 2005;115(3):688–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Limperopoulos C, Soul JS, Haidar H, Huppi PS, Bassan H, Warfield SK, et al. Impaired trophic interactions between the cerebellum and the cerebrum among preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2005;116(4):844–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shah D, Anderson P, Carlin J, Pavlovic M, Howard K, Thompson D, et al. Reduction in cerebellar volumes in preterm infants: relationship to white matter injury and neurodevelopment at two years of age. Pediatr Res. 2006;60(1):97–102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Srinivasan L, Allsop J, Counsell SJ, Boardman JP, Edwards AD, Rutherford M. Smaller cerebellar volumes in very preterm infants at term-equivalent age are associated with the presence of supratentorial lesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27(3):573–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tam E, Ferriero D, Xu D, Berman J, Vigneron D, Barkovich A, et al. Cerebellar development in the preterm neonate: effect of supratentorial brain injury. Pediatr Res. 2009;66(1):102–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tam E, Miller S, Studholme C, Chau V, Glidden D, Poskitt K, et al. Differential effects of intraventricular hemorrhage and white matter injury on preterm cerebellar growth. J Pediatr. 2011;158(3):366–71. Epub 2010 Oct 20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    van Soelen ILC, Brouwer RM, Peper JS, van Beijsterveldt TCEM, van Leeuwen M, de Vries LS, et al. Effects of gestational age and birth weight on brain volumes in healthy 9 year-old children. J Pediatr. 2010;156(6):896–901.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bolduc M, Du Plessis AJ, Evans A, Guizard N, Zhang XUN, Robertson RL, et al. Cerebellar malformations alter regional cerebral development. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(12):1128–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Limperopoulos C, Chilingaryan G, Guizard N, Robertson RL, Du Plessis AJ. Cerebellar injury in the premature infant is associated with impaired growth of specific cerebral regions. Pediatr Res. 2010;68(2):145–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee W, Al-Dossary H, Raybaud C, Young JM, Morgan BR, Whyte HE, et al. Longitudinal cerebellar growth following very preterm birth. J Magnetic Reson Imaging: JMRI. 2015;43(6):1462–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cheong JLY, Thompson DK, Spittle AJ, Potter CR, Walsh JM, Burnett AC, et al. Brain volumes at term-equivalent age are associated with two-year neurodevelopment in moderate and late preterm children. J Pediatr. 2016;174:91–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Spittle AJ, Spencer-Smith MM, Eeles AL, Lee KJ, Lorefice LE, Anderson PJ, et al. Does the Bayley-III Motor Scale at 2 years predict motor outcome at 4 years in very preterm children? Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013;55(5):448–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Luttikhuizen dos Santos ES, de Kieviet JF, Königs M, van Elburg RM, Oosterlaan J. Predictive value of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development on development of very preterm/very low birth weight children: a meta-analysis. Early Hum Dev. 2013;89(7):487–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Raz N, Gunning-Dixon F, Head D, Williamson A, Acker JD. Age and sex differences in the cerebellum and the ventral pons: a prospective MR study of healthy adults. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22(6):1161–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Reiss AL, Kesler SR, Vohr B, Duncan CC, Katz KH, Pajot S, et al. Sex differences in cerebral volumes of 8-year-olds born preterm. J Pediatr. 2004;145(2):242–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Inder TE, Huppi PS, Warfield S, Kikinis R, Zientara GP, Barnes PD, et al. Periventricular white matter injury in the premature infant is followed by reduced cerebral cortical gray matter volume at term. Ann Neurol. 1999;46(5):755–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Anderson PJ, Treyvaud K, Neil JJ, Cheong JLY, Hunt RW, Thompson DK, et al. Associations of newborn brain magnetic resonance imaging with long-term neurodevelopmental impairments in very preterm children. J Pediatr. 2017;87:58–65.e1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kidokoro H, Neil JJ, Inder TE. New MR imaging assessment tool to define brain abnormalities in very preterm infants at term. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34(11):2208–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wechsler D. Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. New York, NY: The Psychological Corporation: Harcourt Brace & Company; 1999.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Semel EM, Wiig EH, Secord WA. Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals (4th-Australian standardised edition). Marrickville, New South Wales, Australia: Harcourt Assessment; 2006.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Manly T, Robertson I, Anderson V, Nimmo-Smith I. The test of everyday attention for children. Suffolk: Thames Valley Test Co.; 1999.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pickering S, Gathercole S. Working memory test battery for children—manual. London: The Psychological Corporation; 2001.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Henderson SE, Sugden DA, Barnett AL. Movement assessment battery for children—2 second edition (movement ABC-2). London: The Psychological Corporation; 2007.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wilson-Ching M, Pascoe L, Doyle LW, Anderson PJ. Effects of correcting for prematurity on cognitive test scores in childhood. J Paediatr Child Health. 2014;50(3):182–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wong HS, Edwards P. Nature or nurture: a systematic review of the effect of socio-economic status on the developmental and cognitive outcomes of children born preterm. Matern Child Health J. 2013;17(9):1689–700.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol. 1995;57(1):289–300.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bender R, Lange S. Adjusting for multiple testing—when and how? J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54(4):343–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Limperopoulos C. Cerebellar injury in the preterm infant. In: Boltshauser E, Schmahmann J, editors. Cerebellar disorders in children clinics in developmental medicine no 191-192. 1st ed. London: Mac Keith Press; 2012.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Haldipur P, Bharti U, Alberti C, Sarkar C, Gulati G, Iyengar S, et al. Preterm delivery disrupts the developmental program of the cerebellum. PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23449.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Boltshauser E, Schmahmann J, editors. Cerebellar disorders in children. 1st ed. London: Mac Keith Press; 2012.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Limperopoulos C, Benson CB, Bassan H, Disalvo DN, Kinnamon DD, Moore M, et al. Cerebellar hemorrhage in the preterm infant: ultrasonographic findings and risk factors. Pediatrics. 2005;116(3):717–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tam EW, Rosenbluth G, Rogers EE, Ferriero DM, Glidden D, Goldstein RB, et al. Cerebellar hemorrhage on magnetic resonance imaging in preterm newborns associated with abnormal neurologic outcome. J Pediatr. 2011;158(2):245–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tam EWY, Chau V, Ferriero DM, Barkovich AJ, Poskitt KJ, Studholme C, et al. Preterm cerebellar growth impairment after postnatal exposure to glucocorticoids. Sci Translational Med. 2011;3(105):105ra.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pavlik A, Buresova M. The neonatal cerebellum: the highest level of glucocorticoid receptors in the brain. Brain Res. 1984;314(1):13–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zwicker JG, Miller SP, Grunau RE, Chau V, Brant R, Studholme C, et al. Smaller cerebellar growth and poorer neurodevelopmental outcomes in very preterm infants exposed to neonatal morphine. J Pediatr. 2016;172:81-7.e2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Messerschmidt A, Brugger PC, Boltshauser E, Zoder G, Sterniste W, Birnbacher R, et al. Disruption of cerebellar development: potential complication of extreme prematurity. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26(7):1659–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Shany E, Inder TE, Goshen S, Lee I, Neil JJ, Smyser CD, et al. Diffusion tensor tractography of the cerebellar peduncles in prematurely born 7-year-old children. Cerebellum. 2016;16(2):314–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Buckner RL, Krienen FM, Castellanos A, Diaz JC, Yeo BT. The organization of the human cerebellum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol. 2011;106(5):2322–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Reeber SL, Otis TS, Sillitoe RV. New roles for the cerebellum in health and disease. Front Syst Neurosci. 2013;7Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bostan AC, Dum RP, Strick PL. The basal ganglia communicate with the cerebellum. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107(18):8452–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Milardi D, Arrigo A, Anastasi G, Cacciola A, Marino S, Mormina E, et al. Extensive direct subcortical cerebellum-basal ganglia connections in human brain as revealed by constrained spherical deconvolution tractography. Front Neuroanat. 2016;10:29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Koziol LF, Budding D, Andreasen N, D’Arrigo S, Bulgheroni S, Imamizu H, et al. Consensus paper: the cerebellum’s role in movement and cognition. Cerebellum. 2014;13(1):151–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Monson BB, Anderson PJ, Matthews LG, Neil JJ, Kapur K, Cheong JLY, et al. Examination of the pattern of growth of cerebral tissue volumes from hospital discharge to early childhood in very preterm infants. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(8):772–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Barnes J, Ridgway GR, Bartlett J, Henley SM, Lehmann M, Hobbs N, et al. Head size, age and gender adjustment in MRI studies: a necessary nuisance? NeuroImage. 2010;53(4):1244–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Voevodskaya O, Simmons A, Nordenskjöld R, Kullberg J, Ahlström H, Lind L, et al. The effects of intracranial volume adjustment approaches on multiple regional MRI volumes in healthy aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014;6:264.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    O’Brien LM, Ziegler DA, Deutsch CK, Frazier JA, Herbert MR, Locascio JJ. Statistical adjustments for brain size in volumetric neuroimaging studies: some practical implications in methods. Psychiatry Res. 2011;193(2):113–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Griffiths A, Morgan P, Anderson PJ, Doyle LW, Lee KJ, Spittle AJ. Predictive value of the movement assessment battery for children—second edition at 4 years, for motor impairment at 8 years in children born preterm. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017;59(5):490–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Aylward GP. The conundrum of prediction. Pediatrics. 2005;116(2):491–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Limperopoulos C, Bassan H, Gauvreau K, Robertson RL, Sullivan NR, Benson CB, et al. Does cerebellar injury in premature infants contribute to the high prevalence of long-term cognitive, learning, and behavioral disability in survivors? Pediatrics. 2007;120(3):584–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Limperopoulos C, Chilingaryan G, Sullivan N, Guizard N, Robertson RL, du Plessis AJ. Injury to the premature cerebellum: outcome is related to remote cortical development. Cereb Cortex. 2014;24(3):728–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Morton SM, Bastian AJ. Cerebellar control of balance and locomotion. Neuroscientist : Rev J Bringing Neurobiol, Neurol Psychiatry. 2004;10(3):247–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Schmahmann JD, Sherman JC. The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. Brain. 1998;121(4):561–79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Barton Robert A, Venditti C. Rapid evolution of the cerebellum in humans and other great apes. Curr Biol. 2014;24(20):2440–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    MacLeod CE, Zilles K, Schleicher A, Rilling JK, Gibson KR. Expansion of the neocerebellum in Hominoidea. J Hum Evol. 2003;44(4):401–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    De Smet HJ, Paquier P, Verhoeven J, Mariën P. The cerebellum: its role in language and related cognitive and affective functions. Brain Lang. 2013;127(3):334–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Schmahmann JD. Disorders of the cerebellum: ataxia, dysmetria of thought, and the cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2004;16(3):367–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Wood NS, Costeloe K, Gibson AT, Hennessy EM, Marlow N, Wilkinson AR. The EPICure study: associations and antecedents of neurological and developmental disability at 30 months of age following extremely preterm birth. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90(2):F134–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Inglese M, Petracca M, Mormina E, Achiron A, Straus-Farber R, Miron S, et al. Cerebellar volume as imaging outcome in progressive multiple sclerosis. PLoS One. 2017;12(4):e0176519.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Abel JM, Witt DM, Rissman EF. Sex differences in the cerebellum and frontal cortex: roles of estrogen receptor alpha and sex chromosome genes. Neuroendocrinology. 2011;93(4):230–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Nguon K, Ladd B, Baxter MG, Sajdel-Sulkowska EM. Sexual dimorphism in cerebellar structure, function, and response to environmental perturbations. Prog Brain Res Volume 148: Elsevier; 2005. p. 341–351.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lillian G. Matthews
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • T. E. Inder
    • 1
  • L. Pascoe
    • 2
    • 3
  • K. Kapur
    • 4
  • K. J. Lee
    • 2
    • 3
  • B. B. Monson
    • 1
    • 5
  • L. W. Doyle
    • 2
    • 3
    • 6
    • 7
  • D. K. Thompson
    • 2
    • 3
    • 8
  • P. J. Anderson
    • 2
    • 9
  1. 1.Department of Pediatric Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women’s HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  2. 2.Murdoch Children’s Research InstituteMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.Department of PaediatricsUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  4. 4.Department of Neurology, Boston Children’s HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  5. 5.Department of Speech and Hearing ScienceUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA
  6. 6.Royal Women’s HospitalMelbourneAustralia
  7. 7.Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  8. 8.Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental HealthMelbourneAustralia
  9. 9.Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical NeurosciencesMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations