Advertisement

The Cerebellum

, Volume 12, Issue 6, pp 856–861 | Cite as

Cerebellar Contribution to Mental Rotation: a cTBS Study

  • Silvia PicazioEmail author
  • Massimiliano Oliveri
  • Giacomo Koch
  • Carlo Caltagirone
  • Laura Petrosini
Original Paper

Abstract

A cerebellar role in spatial information processing has been advanced even in the absence of physical manipulation, as occurring in mental rotation. The present study was aimed at investigating the specific involvement of left and right cerebellar hemispheres in two tasks of mental rotation. We used continuous theta burst stimulation to downregulate cerebellar hemisphere excitability in healthy adult subjects performing two mental rotation tasks: an Embodied Mental Rotation (EMR) task, entailing an egocentric strategy, and an Abstract Mental Rotation (AMR) task entailing an allocentric strategy. Following downregulation of left cerebellar hemisphere, reaction times were slower in comparison to sham stimulation in both EMR and AMR tasks. Conversely, identical reaction times were obtained in both tasks following right cerebellar hemisphere and sham stimulations. No effect of cerebellar stimulation side was found on response accuracy. The present findings document a specialization of the left cerebellar hemisphere in mental rotation regardless of the kind of stimulus to be rotated.

Keywords

Cerebellum Mental rotation cTBS Allocentric–egocentric strategy 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by a grant from Italian Minister of Health to M.O.

Conflict of Interest

None of the authors has a conflict of interest with respect to the purposes of the present study.

References

  1. 1.
    Kosslyn SM, Thompson WL, Wraga M, Alpert NM. Imagining rotation by endogenous versus exogenous forces: distinct neural mechanisms. Neuroreport. 2001;12:2519–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kosslyn SM, DiGirolamo GJ, Thompson WL, Alpert NM. Mental rotation of objects versus hands: neural mechanisms revealed by positron emission tomography. Psychophysiology. 1998;35:151–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moreau D. Constraining movement alters the recruitment of motor processes in mental rotation. Exp Brain Res. 2013;3:447–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vingerhoets G, de Lange FP, Vandemaele P, Deblaere K, Achten E. Motor imagery in mental rotation: an fMRI study. NeuroImage. 2002;3:1623–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tomasino B, Borroni P, Isaja A, Rumiati RI. The role of the primary motor cortex in mental rotation: a TMS study. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2005;22:348–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ganis G, Keenan JP, Kosslyn SM, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of primary motor cortex affects mental rotation. Cereb Cortex. 2000;10:175–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Creem-Regehr SH, Neil JA, Yeh HJ. Neural correlates of two imagined egocentric transformations. Neuroimage. 2007;35:916–27.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9:97–113.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ratcliff G. Spatial thought, mental rotation and the right cerebral hemisphere. Neuropsychologia. 1979;17:49–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thurstone LL. Psychology as a quantitative rational science. Science. 1937;85:227–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rothwell JC. Techniques and mechanisms of action of transcranial stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Neurosci Methods. 1997;74:113–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huang YZ, Edwards MJ, Rounis E, Bhatia KP, Rothwell JC. Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron. 2005;45:201–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Del Olmo MF, Cheeran B, Koch G, Rothwell JC. Role of the cerebellum in externally paced rhythmic finger movements. J Neurophysiol. 2007;98:145–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koch G, Oliveri M, Torriero S, Salerno S, Lo Gerfo E, Caltagirone C. Repetitive TMS of cerebellum interferes with millisecond time processing. Exp Brain Res. 2007;179:291–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ugawa Y, Uesaka Y, Terao Y, Hanajima R, Kanazawa I. Magnetic stimulation over the cerebellum in humans. Ann Neurol. 1995;37:703–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oliveri M, Koch G, Torriero S, Caltagirone C. Increased facilitation of the primary motor cortex following 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the contralateral cerebellum in normal humans. Neurosci Lett. 2005;376:188–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fierro B, Giglia G, Palermo A, Pecoraro C, Scalia S, Brighina F. Modulatory effects of 1 Hz rTMS over the cerebellum on motor cortex excitability. Exp Brain Res. 2007;176:440–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Torriero S, Oliveri M, Koch G, Caltagirone C, Petrosini L. Interference of left and right cerebellar rTMS with procedural learning. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004;16:1605–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Torriero S, Oliveri M, Koch G, Lo Gerfo E, Salerno S, Petrosini L, et al. Cortical networks of procedural learning: evidence from cerebellar damage. Neuropsychologia. 2007;45:1208–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zacks J, Rypma B, Gabrieli JD, Tversky B, Glover GH. Imagined transformations of bodies: an fMRI investigation. Neuropsychologia. 1999;37:1029–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bode S, Koeneke S, Jäncke L. Different strategies do not moderate primary motor cortex involvement in mental rotation: a TMS study. Behav Brain Funct. 2007;3:38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Banta Lavenex P, Lecci S, Prêtre V, Brandner C, Mazza C, Pasquier J, et al. As the world turns: short-term human spatial memory in egocentric and allocentric coordinates. Behav Brain Res. 2011;219:132–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Falconer CJ, Mast FW. Balancing the mind: vestibular induced facilitation of egocentric mental transformations. Exp Psychol. 2012;59:332–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stoodley CJ, Schmahmann JD. Functional topography in the human cerebellum: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. NeuroImage. 2009;44:489–501.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stoodley CJ. The cerebellum and cognition: evidence from functional imaging studies. Cerebellum. 2012;11:352–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stoodley CJ, Valera EM, Schmahmann JD. Functional topography of the cerebellum for motor and cognitive tasks: an fMRI study. NeuroImage. 2012;59(2):1560–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gottwald B, Wilde B, Mihajlovic Z, Mehdorn HM. Evidence for distinct cognitive deficits after focal cerebellar lesions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75:1524–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Baillieux H, De Smet HJ, Dobbeleir A, Paquier PF, De Deyn PP, Mariën P. Cognitive and affective disturbances following focal cerebellar damage in adults: a neuropsychological and SPECT study. Cortex. 2010;46:869–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Harris IM, Miniussi C. Parietal lobe contribution to mental rotation demonstrated with rTMS. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003;15:315–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Oliveri M, Torriero S, Koch G, Salerno S, Petrosini L, Caltagirone C. The role of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the study of cerebellar cognitive function. Cerebellum. 2007;6:95–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Silvia Picazio
    • 1
    • 5
    Email author
  • Massimiliano Oliveri
    • 2
    • 4
  • Giacomo Koch
    • 2
    • 3
  • Carlo Caltagirone
    • 2
    • 3
  • Laura Petrosini
    • 1
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity “Sapienza”RomeItaly
  2. 2.Clinical and Behavioural Neurology LaboratoryIRCCS Santa Lucia FoundationRomeItaly
  3. 3.Department of Neuroscience“Tor Vergata” University of RomeRomeItaly
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyUniversity of PalermoPalermoItaly
  5. 5.Clinical and Behavioural Neurology LaboratoryIRCCS Santa Lucia FoundationRomeItaly
  6. 6.IRCCS Santa Lucia FoundationRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations