An Electrophysiological Study of Visual Processing in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2 (SCA2)
- 110 Downloads
Reports of visual functional impairment in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 (SCA2) have been studied previously using pattern reversal visually evoked potentials (VEPs) with contradictory results. To provide additional evidence to this area, visual functions were studied using VEPs and event-related potentials (ERPs) in a group of ten patients with genetically verified SCA2. The electrophysiological examination included pattern reversal and motion-onset VEPs as well as visually driven oddball ERPs with an evaluation of a target and a pre-attentive response. In six patients, we found abnormal visual/cognitive processing that differed from normal values in latency, but not in the amplitude of the dominant VEP/ERP peaks. Among the VEPs/ERPs used, the motion-onset VEPs exhibited the highest sensitivity and showed a strong Spearman correlation to SCA2 duration (from r = 0.82 to r = 0.90, p < 0.001) and clinical state assessed by Brief Ataxia Rating Scale (from r = 0.71 (p = 0.022) to r = 0.80 (p < 0.001)). None of the VEP/ERP latencies showed a correlation to the triplet repeats of the SCA2 gene. In three patients, we did not find any visual/cognitive pathology, and one subject showed only a single subtle prolongation of the VEP peak. The observed visual/cognitive deficit was related to the subjects’ clinical state and the illness duration, but no relationship to the genetic marker of SCA2 was found. From the VEP/ERP types used, the motion-onset VEPs seems to be the most promising candidate for clinical state monitoring rather than a tool for early diagnostic use.
KeywordsSpinocerebellar ataxia type 2 Visual evoked potentials Event-related potentials Motion processing
This study is supported by Grant Agency of the Czech Republic 309/09/0869.
Conflict of Interest
There is no conflict of interest and all funding sources supporting the work and all institutional or corporate affiliations of ours are acknowledged.
- 4.Perretti A, Santoro L, Lanzillo B, Filla A, De Michele G, Barbieri F, et al. Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia type I: multimodal electrophysiological study and comparison between SCA1 and SCA2 patients. J Neurol Sci. 1996;142(1–2):45–53. doi: 10.1016/0022-510X(96)00140-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Helsinki WMADo. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. 2004. http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm (updated 200423 January 2008).
- 24.Restivo DA, Lanza S, Saponara R, Rapisarda G, Giuffrida S, Palmeri A. Changes of cortical excitability of human motor cortex in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2: a study with paired transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurol Sci. 2002;198(1–2):87–92. doi: 10.1016/S0022-510X(02)00086-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Velázquez-Perez L, Rodríguez-Labrada R, Canales-Ochoa N, Sanchez-Cruz G, Fernandez-Ruiz J, Montero JM, et al. Progression markers of spinocerebellar ataxia 2. A twenty years neurophysiological follow up study. J Neurol Sci. 2010;290(1–2):22–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2009.12.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar