The Cerebellum

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 539–541 | Cite as

Synaptic Integration in Cerebellar Granule Cells

Article

Abstract

To understand the function of cerebellar granule cells, we need detailed knowledge about the information carried by their afferent mossy fibers and how this information is integrated by the granule cells. Recently, we made whole cell recordings from granule cells in the non-anesthetized, decerebrate cats. All recordings were made in the forelimb area of the C3 zone for which the afferent and efferent connections and functional organization have been investigated in detail. Major findings of the study were that the mossy fiber input to single granule cells was modality- and receptive field-specific and that simultaneous activity in two and usually more of the afferent mossy fibers were required to activate the granule cell spike. The high threshold for action potentials and the convergence of afferents with virtually identical information suggest that an important function of granule cells is to increase the signal-to-noise ratio of the mossy fiber–parallel fiber information. Thus a high-sensitivity, noisy mossy fiber input is transformed by the granule cell to a high-sensitivity, low-noise signal.

Keywords

Sensory Granule cells Mossy fibers 

References

  1. 1.
    Braitenberg V, Onesto N (1962) The cerebellar cortex as a timing organ. Discussion of an hypothesis. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Medical Cybernetics. Gianni, Naples, pp 1–19Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Marr D (1969) A theory of cerebellar cortex. J Physiol 202:437–470PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ekerot CF, Jörntell H (2003) Parallel fiber receptive fields: a key to understanding cerebellar operation and learning. Cerebellum 2:101–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Garwicz M, Jörntell H, Ekerot CF (1998) Cutaneous receptive fields and topography of mossy fibres and climbing fibres projecting to cat cerebellar C3 zone. J Physiol 512:277–293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ekerot CF, Jörntell H (2001) Parallel fibre receptive fields of Purkinje cells and interneurons are climbing fibre-specific. Eur J Neurosci 13:1303–1310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jörntell H, Ekerot CF (2006) Properties of somatosensory synaptic integration in cerebellar granule cells in vivo. J Neurosci 26:11786–11797PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rancz EA, Ishikawa T, Duguid I, Chadderton P, Mahon S, Häusser M (2007) High-fidelity transmission of sensory information by single cerebellar mossy fibre boutons. Nature 450:1245–1248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ito M (1984) The cerebellum and neural control. Raven, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jörntell H, Ekerot CF (2003) Reciprocal bidirectional plasticity of parallel fiber receptive fields in cerebellar Purkinje cells and their afferent interneurons. Neuron 34:797–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Isope P, Barbour B (2002) Properties of unitary granule cell→Purkinje cell synapses in adult rat cerebellar slices. J Neurosci 22(22):9668–9678, 15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brunel N, Hakim V, Isope P, Nadal JP, Barbour B (2004) Optimal information storage and the distribution of synaptic weights: perceptron versus Purkinje cell. Neuron 43:745–757PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Experimental Medical Science, Section for NeuroscienceBiomedical Center F10LundSweden

Personalised recommendations