Advertisement

Traditional Victims and Cybervictims: Prevalence, Overlap, and Association with Mental Health Among Adolescents in Singapore

  • Jerrine Z. N. KhongEmail author
  • Yi Ren Tan
  • John M. Elliott
  • Daniel Shuen Sheng Fung
  • Andre Sourander
  • Say How Ong
Original Paper

Abstract

Traditional bullying typically occurs in schools and has been associated with a myriad of mental health problems. Recent evidence has indicated that cyberbullying may just be traditional bullying that is extended to the online world, but this possibility has received only limited study in Asian countries. This study explored the co-occurrence of traditional and cybervictimization and its association with mental health among 3319 adolescents aged 12 to 17 years in Singapore. Victims of bullying were categorized into mutually exclusive groups: traditional-only victims, cyber-only victims, or combined traditional and cybervictims. Results indicated that there were substantial overlaps between victimization in traditional bullying and cyberbullying and that traditional victimization was more prevalent than cybervictimization. Being a victim of either form of bullying (i.e., traditional-only or cyber-only victims) was associated with higher reports of internalizing and externalizing problems, and combined traditional and cybervictims reported the most internalizing problems. However, there were no significant differences in problem scores between traditional-only victims and cyber-only victims. The findings highlight the need to consider the extensive overlap between traditional and cybervictimization when investigating their differential association with adolescents’ mental health. Prevention and intervention efforts by school staff and mental health practitioners need to target both traditional bullying and cyberbullying in an integrated manner, and extra attention should be provided to adolescents who are victims of both forms of bullying.

Keywords

Bullying Cyberbullying Victim Internalizing problems Externalizing problems 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Qing Rong Chan, Rosie Lim, Jacky Tan, and Grace Yap for their assistance with data collection, and Denise Liu for her invaluable feedback on manuscripts drafts. We are grateful to the Ministry of Education Singapore, school principals, teachers, and counselors for their support and thank all students who participated in this research study.

Funding

Research reported in this manuscript was supported by Singapore Children’s Society and the National Healthcare Group Small Innovative Grant [grant number SIG/14007].

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest related to this study.

References

  1. Achenbach, T. M., Becker, A., Dopfner, M., Heiervang, E., Roessner, V., Steinhausen, H. C., et al. (2008). Multicultural assessment of child and adolescent psychopathology with ASEBA and SDQ instruments: Research findings, applications, and future directions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(3), 251–275.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01867.x.Google Scholar
  2. Antoniadou, N., & Kokkinos, C. M. (2015). Cyber and school bullying: Same or different phenomena? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 25, 363–372.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.09.013.Google Scholar
  3. Arseneault, L. (2018). Annual research review: The persistent and pervasive impact of being bullied in childhood and adolescence: Implications for policy and practice. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59(4), 405–421.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12841.Google Scholar
  4. Arseneault, L., Walsh, E., Trzesniewski, K., Newcombe, R., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2006). Bullying Victimization Uniquely Contributes to Adjustment Problems in Young Children: A Nationally Representative Cohort Study. Pediatrics, 118(1), 130–138.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-2388.Google Scholar
  5. Beckman, L., Hagquist, C., & Hellström, L. (2012). Does the association with psychosomatic health problems differ between cyberbullying and traditional bullying? Emotional and Behavioral Difficulties, 17(3–4), 421–434.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2012.704228.Google Scholar
  6. Bonanno, R. A., & Hymel, S. (2013). Cyber bullying and internalizing difficulties: Above and beyond the impact of traditional forms of bullying. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 42(2), 685–697.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9937-1.Google Scholar
  7. Bradshaw, C. P., Waasdorp, T. E., & O’Brennan, L. M. (2013). A latent class approach to examining forms of peer victimization. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 839–849.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032091.Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, M. A. (2005). Cyber bullying: An old problem in a new guise? Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 15(1), 68–76.  https://doi.org/10.1375/ajgc.15.1.68.Google Scholar
  9. Campbell, M., Spears, B., Slee, P., Butler, D., & Kift, S. (2012). Victims’ perceptions of traditional and cyberbullying, and the psychosocial correlates of their victimization. Emotional and Behavioral Difficulties, 17(3–4), 389–401.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2012.704316.Google Scholar
  10. Chang, F.-C., Lee, C.-M., Chiu, C.-H., His, W.-Y., Huang, T.-F., & Panm, Y.-C. (2013). Relationships among cyberbullying, school bullying, and mental health in Taiwanese adolescents. Journal of School Health, 83(6), 454–462.  https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12050.Google Scholar
  11. Chen, L. M., Cheng, Y. Y., Wang, W. C., & Hsueh, C.-W. (2015). The intersection between perceived severity and frequency of being bullied: A Rasch measurement approach. Educational Psychology, 35(4), 397–415.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.864755.Google Scholar
  12. Della Cioppa, V., O’Neil, A., & Craig, W. (2015). Learning from traditional bullying interventions: A review of research on cyberbullying and best practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 61–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.05.009.Google Scholar
  13. Dunne, M., Pham, T. P., Le, H. H. T., & Sun, J. (2016). Bullying and educational stress in schools in East Asia. Ending the Torment: Tackling bullying from the schoolyard to cyberspace children’s exposure to bullying: Data and regional trends (pp. 131–143). New York: United Nation Publications.  https://doi.org/10.18356/dd4ab051-en.
  14. Goodman, R. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38(5), 581–586.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x.Google Scholar
  15. Goodman, A., Lamping, D. L., & Ploubidis, G. B. (2010). When to use broader internalizing and externalizing subscales instead of the hypothesised five subscales on the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ): Data from British parents, teachers and children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(8), 1179–1191.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9434-x.Google Scholar
  16. Hase, C. N., Goldberg, S. B., Smith, D., Stuck, A., & Campain, J. (2015). Impacts of traditional bullying and cyberbullying on the mental health of middle school and high school students. Psychology in the Schools, 52(6), 607–617.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21841.Google Scholar
  17. Hofstede, G. H., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (Eds.). (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  18. Hong, J. S., & Espelage, D. L. (2012). A review of research on bullying and peer victimization in school: An ecological system analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(4), 311–322.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.03.003.Google Scholar
  19. Hunter, S. C., Boyle, J. M. E., & Warden, D. (2010). Help seeking amongst child and adolescent victims of peer-aggression and bullying: The influence of school-stage, gender, victimisation, appraisal, and emotion. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(3), 375–390.  https://doi.org/10.1348/0007099041552378.Google Scholar
  20. Internet World Statistics. (2017). Asia internet use, population data and Facebook statistics. http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats3.htm. Retrieved November 11, 2017.
  21. Ji, L., Zhang, W., & Jones, K. (2016). Children’s experiences of and attitudes towards bullying and victimization: A cross-cultural comparison between China and England. In P. K. Smith, K. Kwak, & U. Toda (Eds.), School Bullying in Different Cultures, Eastern and Western Perspectives (pp. 153–169). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kochenderfer-Ladd, B., & Skinner, K. (2002). Children’s coping strategies: Moderators of the effects of peer victimization? Developmental Psychology, 38(2), 267–278.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.2.267.Google Scholar
  23. Koh, C. W., & Tan, A. (2008). Bullying in Singapore Schools (p. 8). Singapore: Singapore Children’s Society Research Monograph No.Google Scholar
  24. Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073–1137.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618.Google Scholar
  25. Kowalski, R. M., Morgan, C. A., & Limber, S. P. (2012). Traditional bullying as a potential warning sign of cyberbullying. School Psychology International, 33(5), 505–519.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034312445244.Google Scholar
  26. Kubiszewski, V., Fontaine, R., Potard, C., & Auzoult, L. (2015). Does cyberbullying overlap with school bullying when taking modality of involvement into account? Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 49–57.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.049.Google Scholar
  27. Menesini, E., Calussi, P., & Nocenti, A. (2012). Cyberbullying and traditional bullying: Unique, additive, and synergistic effects on psychological health symptoms. In Q. Li, D. Cross, & P. K. Smith (Eds.), Cyberbullying in the global playground: Research from international perspectives (pp. 245–262). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  28. Microsoft. (2012). Online bullying WW among children 817. http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9808199. Accessed 11 November 2017.
  29. Mitchell, K. J., Jones, L. M., Turner, H. A., Shattuck, A., & Wolak, J. (2015). The role of technology in peer harassment: Does it amplify harm for youth? Psychology of Violence, 6(2), 193–204.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039317.Google Scholar
  30. Modecki, K. L., Minchin, J., Harbaugh, A. G., Guerra, N. G., & Runions, K. C. (2014). Bullying prevalence across contexts: A meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55(5), 602–611.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.06.007.Google Scholar
  31. O’Keefe, M., & Sela-Amit, M. (1997). An examination of the effects of race/ethnicity and social class on adolescent’s exposure to violence. Journal of Social Service Research, 22(3), 53–71.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J079v22n03_03.Google Scholar
  32. Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  33. Olweus, D. (2012). Cyberbullying: An overrated phenomenon? European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(5), 520–538.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.682358.Google Scholar
  34. Olweus, D., & Limber, S. P. (2018). Some problems with cyberbullying research. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 139–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.04.012.Google Scholar
  35. Payne, A. A., & Hutzell, K. L. (2015). Old wine, new bottle? Comparing interpersonal bullying and cyberbullying victimization. Youth & Society, 49(8), 1149–1178.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X15617401.Google Scholar
  36. Perren, S., Dooley, J., Shaw, T., & Cross, D. (2010). Bullying in school and cyberspace: Associations with depressive symptoms in Swiss and Australian adolescents. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 4(1), 28–38.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1753-2000-4-28.Google Scholar
  37. Raskauskas, J. (2010). Text-bullying: Associations with traditional bullying and depression among New Zealand adolescents. Journal of School Violence, 9(1), 74–97.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220903185605.Google Scholar
  38. Reijntjes, A., Kamphuis, J. H., Prinzie, P., Boelen, P. A., van der Schoot, M., & Telch, M. J. (2011). Prospective linkages between peer victimization and externalizing problems in children: A meta-analysis. Aggressive Behavior, 37(3), 215–222.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20374.Google Scholar
  39. Reijntjes, A., Kamphuis, J. H., Prinzie, P., & Telch, M. J. (2010). Peer victimization and internalizing problems in children: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Child Abuse and Neglect, 34(4), 244–252.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.07.009.Google Scholar
  40. Salmivalli, C., Kärnä, A., & Poskiparta, E. (2011). Counteracting bullying in Finland: The KiVa Program and its effects on different forms of being bullied. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(5), 405–411.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025411407457.Google Scholar
  41. Scott, J. G., Moore, S. E., Sly, P. D., & Norman, R. E. (2014). Bullying in children and adolescents: A modifiable risk factor for mental illness. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 48, 209–212.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867413508456.Google Scholar
  42. Sittichai, R., & Smith, P. K. (2015). Bullying in South-East Asian Countries: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 22–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.06.002.Google Scholar
  43. Smith, P. K. (2012). Cyberbullying and cyber aggression. In S. R. Jimerson, A. B. Nickerson, M. J. Mayer, & M. J. Furlong (Eds.), Handbook of School Violence and School Safety: International Research and Practice (2nd ed., pp. 93–103). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippettm, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376–385.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x.Google Scholar
  45. Solberg, M. E., & Olweus, D. (2003). Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior, 29(3), 239–268.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.10047.Google Scholar
  46. Sourander, A., Klomek, A. B., Ikonen, M., Lindroos, J., Luntamo, T., Koskelainen, M., et al. (2010). Psychosocial risk factors associated with cyberbullying among adolescents: A population-based study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67(7), 720–728.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.79.Google Scholar
  47. Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(1), 27–56.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-010-9109-1.Google Scholar
  48. Vitoroulis, I., & Vaillancourt, T. (2015). Meta-analytic results of ethnic group differences in peer victimization. Aggressive Behavior, 41(2), 149–170.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21564.Google Scholar
  49. Waasdorp, T. E., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2015). The Overlap Between Cyberbullying and Traditional Bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 56(5), 483–488.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.12.002.Google Scholar
  50. Wachs, S., Junger, M., & Sittichai, R. (2015). Traditional, Cyber and Combined Bullying Roles: Differences in Risky Online and Offline Activities. Societies, 5(1), 109–135.  https://doi.org/10.3390/soc5010109.Google Scholar
  51. Wolke, D., Copeland, W. E., Angold, A., & Costello, E. J. (2013). Impact of bullying in childhood on adult health, wealth, crime, and social outcomes. Psychological Science, 24(10), 1958–1970.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613481608.Google Scholar
  52. Wolke, D., Lee, K., & Guy, A. (2017). Cyberbullying: A storm in a teacup? European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 26(8), 899–908.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-017-0954-6.Google Scholar
  53. Zych, I., Ortega-Ruiz, R., & Del Rey, R. (2015). Systematic review of theoretical studies on bullying and cyberbullying: Facts, knowledge, prevention, and intervention. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.10.001.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Advocacy and Research DepartmentSingapore Children’s SocietySingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Department of Developmental PsychiatryInstitute of Mental Health, SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  4. 4.Department of Child PsychiatryTurku University Hospital and Turku UniversityTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations