Teachers’ Perceptions of Self- and Peer-Identified Victims
- 114 Downloads
This study examined whether teachers perceived difference between youth with divergent self- and peer-reports of victimization who exhibit varying patterns of adjustment. Using an ethnically diverse sample of 1360 students from 5th grade classrooms (Mage = 12.01) in rural schools across the USA, we examined teachers’ perceptions of four different victim groups identified using latent profile analysis: convergent victims (high self- and peer-reports of victimization), self-identified victims (high self-, low peer-reports), peer-identified victims (high peer-, low self-reports), and nonvictims (low self- and peer-reports). We found that teachers perceived meaningful differences between victim groups on academic (e.g., problems paying attention), social (e.g., popularity, liked by peers), behavioral (e.g., aggression), and psychological (i.e., internalizing) indices as well as students’ involvement in bullying. Key findings include that convergent victims had more problems academically (i.e., paying attention in class) and were more frequently bullied compared to all other victim groups according to teachers. Teachers also viewed self-identified victims as having more psychological problems and as being more frequently bullied than nonvictims, although they perceived no differences between self-identified victims and nonvictims on indices of social functioning such as popularity, whether they were liked by peers, or whether they were a class leader. Implications for our understanding of different types of victims and suggestions for how teachers and school personnel may support them are discussed.
KeywordsVictimization Self-report Peer-report Teacher perceptions Student adjustment
This research was supported in part by grants from the Institute of Education Sciences (R305A04056; R305A120812; R305A140434; R305A160398) awarded to Thomas W. Farmer and Jill V. Hamm (PIs). The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not represent the granting agency.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Abdi, H. (2010). Holm’s sequential Bonferroni procedure. In N. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of research design (pp. 574–578). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Bettencourt, A. F., Musci, R., Clemans, K. H., Carinci, J., & Ialongo, N. S. (2017). Patterns of peer-and teacher-rated aggression, victimization, and prosocial behavior in an urban, predominantly African American preadolescent sample: Associations with peer-perceived characteristics. Journal of School Psychology,65, 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.07.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bouman, T., Van Der Meulen, M., Goossens, F. A., Olthof, T., Vermande, M. M., & Aleva, E. A. (2012). Peer and self-reports of victimization and bullying: Their differential association with internalizing problems and social adjustment. Journal of School Psychology,50, 759–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2012.08.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bukowski, W. M., Buhrmester, D., & Underwood, M. K. (2011). Peer relations as a developmental context. In M. K. Underwood & L. H. Rosen (Eds.), Social development: Relationships in infancy, childhood, and adolescence (pp. 153–179). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Cairns, R. B., & Cairns, B. D. (1994). Lifelines and risks: Pathways of youth in our time. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Cairns, R. B., Leung, M. C., Gest, S. D., & Cairns, B. D. (1995). A brief method for assessing social development: Structure, reliability, stability, and developmental validity of the Interpersonal Competence Scale. Behaviour Research and Therapy,33, 725–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(95)00004-H.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Davidson, L. M., & Demaray, M. K. (2007). Social support as a moderator between victimization and internalizing-externalizing distress from bullying. School Psychology Review,36, 383–405.Google Scholar
- Eccles, J. S., & Midgley, C. (1989). Stage-environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for young adolescents. Research on Motivation in Education,3, 139–186.Google Scholar
- Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., et al. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist,48, 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Farmer, T. W., Estell, D. B., Bishop, J. L., O’Neal, K. K., & Cairns, B. D. (2003). Rejected bullies or popular leaders? The social relations of aggressive subtypes of rural African American early adolescents. Developmental Psychology,39, 992–1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-16220.127.116.112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Farmer, T. W., Hamm, J. V., Lane, K. L., Lee, D., Sutherland, K. S., Hall, C. M., et al. (2013). Conceptual foundations and components of a contextual intervention to promote student engagement during early adolescence: The supporting early adolescent learning and social success (SEALS) model. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 23, 115–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2013.785181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Farmer, T. W., Irvin, M. J., Sgamatto, A. N., Dadisman, K., & Thompson, J. H. (2009). Interpersonal competence configurations in rural Appalachian fifth graders: Academic achievement and associated adjustment factors. Elementary School Journal,109, 301–321. https://doi.org/10.1086/592309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gest, S. D., Madill, R. A., Zadzora, K. M., Miller, A. M., & Rodkin, P. C. (2014). Teacher management of elementary classroom social dynamics: Associations with changes in student adjustment. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders,22, 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426613512677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gladden, R. M., Vivolo-Kantor, A. M., Hamburger, M. E., & Lumpkin, C. D. (2014). Bullying surveillance among youths: Uniform definitions for public health and recommended data elements, version 1.0. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
- Hamm, J. V., Farmer, T. W., Dadisman, K., Gravelle, M., & Murray, A. R. (2011). Teachers’ attunement to students’ peer group affiliations as a source of improved student experiences of the school social–affective context following the middle school transition. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,32, 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2010.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics,6, 65–70.Google Scholar
- Ladd, G. W., Ettekal, I., & Kochenderfer-Ladd, B. (2017). Peer victimization trajectories from kindergarten through high school: Differential pathways for children’s school engagement and achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology,109, 826–841. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Merikangas, K. R., He, J. P., Burstein, M., Swendsen, J., Avenevoli, S., Case, B., et al. (2011). Service utilization for lifetime mental disorders in US adolescents: Results of the national comorbidity survey-adolescent supplement (NCS-A). Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,50, 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2010.10.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.) [Computer software manual]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Norwalk, K. E., Hamm, J. V., Farmer, T. W., & Barnes, K. L. (2016). Improving the school context of early adolescence through teacher attunement to victimization: Effects on school belonging. The Journal of Early Adolescence,36, 989–1009. https://doi.org/10.1177/027431615590230.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nylund, K., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation Study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 535–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Olweus, D. (1993). Bully/victim problems among schoolchildren: Long-term consequences and an effective intervention program. In S. Hodgins (Ed.), Mental disorder and crime (pp. 317–349). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Huitsing, G., Sainio, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2014). The role of teachers in bullying: The relation between antibullying attitudes, efficacy, and efforts to reduce bullying. Journal of Educational Psychology,106, 1135–1143. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Oldehinkel, A. J., De Winter, A. F., Verhulst, F. C., & Ormel, J. (2005). Bullying and victimization in elementary schools: A comparison of bullies, victims, bully/victims, and uninvolved preadolescents. Developmental Psychology,41, 672–682. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1618.104.22.1682.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wentzel, K. R. (2009). Peers and academic functioning at school. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Social, emotional, and personality development in context. Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 531–547). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Williford, A., Brisson, D., Bender, K., Jenson, J., & Forrest-Bank, S. (2011). Patterns of aggressive behavior and peer victimization from childhood to early adolescence: A latent class analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 644–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9583-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yoon, J. (2004). Predicting teacher interventions in bullying situations. Education and Treatment of Children,27, 34–45.Google Scholar