An Empirical Approach to Complete Mental Health Classification in Adolescents
Using latent profile analysis (LPA), this study empirically identified dual-factor mental health subtypes, with a goal of examining structural stability of emerging latent classes over three high school years. Profiles’ relations with distal indicators of well-being, psychosocial distress, and self-reported grades were examined to explore the validity of emerging classes. A sample of 332 high school students reported on their social–emotional strengths and psychological distress during the fall term of their ninth-, tenth-, and eleventh-grade years. In Grade 12, students reported on measures assessing their grades and social–emotional experiences. Independent LPAs for each grade year yielded four mental health subtypes—complete mental health, moderately mentally healthy, symptomatic but content, and troubled—and provided evidence for the structural stability of the dual-factor mental health construct. Across high school years, most students were in the complete or moderately mentally healthy classes, with the troubled class consistently representing the smallest proportion of the sample. Students in classes with higher levels of strengths and lower levels of distress reported higher grades, prosocial contribution to community, and higher life satisfaction, and fewer symptoms of anxiety and depression. Implications and future directions for research and school-based practice are discussed.
KeywordsDual-factor mental health Adolescents Classification Latent profile analysis (LPA)
Support for this study was provided in part by a grant from the U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences (#R305A160157). The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute of Education Sciences or the U.S. Department of Education.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Arnold, M. E., Nott, B. D., & Meinhold, J. L. (2012). The positive youth development inventory full version. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University.Google Scholar
- Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2015). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Using the BCH method in Mplus to estimate a distal outcome model and an arbitrary secondary model. Mplus Web Notes, 21(2), 1–22.Google Scholar
- California Department of Education. (n.d.). California school district secondary school survey results fall 2009/spring 2010: Core module A. Retrieved from http://chks.wested.org/resources/a-text_0910.pdf.
- Clark, S. L., & Muthén, B. (2009). Relating latent class analysis results to variables not included in the analysis. Los Angeles, CA: University of California. (Unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
- Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 430–457. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Goodman, R. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 38, 581–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., & Löwe, B. (2010). The Patient Health Questionnaire somatic, anxiety, and depressive symptom scales: A systematic review. General Hospital Psychiatry, 32, 345–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.03.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Masyn, K. E. (2013). Latent class analysis and finite mixture modeling. In T. D. Little (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods (pp. 551–611). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Merikangas, K. R., Jian-ping, H., Burstein, M., Swanson, S. A., Avenevoli, S., Lihong, C., et al. (2010). Lifetime prevalence of mental disorders in US adolescents: Results from the National Comorbidity Study-Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A). Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 49, 980–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2010.05.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Merikangas, K. R., Nakamura, E., & Kessler, R. C. (2009). Epidemiology of mental disorders in children and adolescents. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 11, 7–20.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th Ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Nylund, K. L. (2007). Latent transition analysis: Modeling extensions and an application to peer victimization. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
- Nylund, K., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2007a). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 535–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rebelez-Ernst, J. L. (2015). Capturing complete mental health among adolescents: Investigation of covitality latent class typologies. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
- Richardson, L., McCauley, E., & Katon, W. (2009). Collaborative care for adolescent depression: A pilot study. General Hospital Psychiatry, 31, 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2008.09.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Scales, P. C. (1999). Reducing risks and building developmental assets: Essential actions for promoting adolescent health. Journal of School Health, 69, l13–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.l746-1561.1999.tb07219.x.Google Scholar
- Smith, B. H., Pelham, W. E., Jr., Gnagy, E., Molina, B., & Evans, S. (2000). The reliability, validity, and unique contributions of self-report by adolescents receiving treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 489–499. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006X.68.3.489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sticca, F., Goetz, T., Bieg, M., Hall, N. C., Eberle, F., & Haag, L. (2017). Examining the accuracy of students’ self-reported academic grades from a correlational and a discrepancy perspective: Evidence from a longitudinal study. PLoS ONE, 12(11), e0187367. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Suldo, S. M., & Shaffer, E. J. (2008). Looking beyond psychopathology: The dual-factor model of mental health in youth. School Psychology Review, 37, 52–68.Google Scholar
- Vermunt, J. K. (2004). Latent profile model. In M. S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, & T. F. Liao (Eds.), The Sage encyclopedia of social sciences research methods (pp. 554–555). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- von der Embse, N. P., Iaccarino, S., Mankin, A., Kilgus, S. P., & Magen, E. (2016). Development and validation of the social, academic, and emotional behavior risk screener—Student Rating Scale. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 42, 186–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508416679410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wasserman, L. (1997). Bayesian model selection and model averaging. Presented at mathematical psychology symposium “Methods for model selection,” Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization. (2016). Mental health: Strengthening our response (Fact Sheet). Retrieved from www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs220/en/.