Advertisement

An Empirical Approach to Complete Mental Health Classification in Adolescents

  • Stephanie A. MooreEmail author
  • Erin Dowdy
  • Karen Nylund-Gibson
  • Michael J. Furlong
Original Paper

Abstract

Using latent profile analysis (LPA), this study empirically identified dual-factor mental health subtypes, with a goal of examining structural stability of emerging latent classes over three high school years. Profiles’ relations with distal indicators of well-being, psychosocial distress, and self-reported grades were examined to explore the validity of emerging classes. A sample of 332 high school students reported on their social–emotional strengths and psychological distress during the fall term of their ninth-, tenth-, and eleventh-grade years. In Grade 12, students reported on measures assessing their grades and social–emotional experiences. Independent LPAs for each grade year yielded four mental health subtypes—complete mental health, moderately mentally healthy, symptomatic but content, and troubled—and provided evidence for the structural stability of the dual-factor mental health construct. Across high school years, most students were in the complete or moderately mentally healthy classes, with the troubled class consistently representing the smallest proportion of the sample. Students in classes with higher levels of strengths and lower levels of distress reported higher grades, prosocial contribution to community, and higher life satisfaction, and fewer symptoms of anxiety and depression. Implications and future directions for research and school-based practice are discussed.

Keywords

Dual-factor mental health Adolescents Classification Latent profile analysis (LPA) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Support for this study was provided in part by a grant from the U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences (#R305A160157). The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute of Education Sciences or the U.S. Department of Education.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

12310_2019_9311_MOESM1_ESM.docx (63 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 62 kb)

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antaramian, S. P., Huebner, E. S., Hills, K. J., & Valois, R. F. (2010). A dual-factor model of mental health: Toward a more comprehensive understanding of youth functioning. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 80, 462–472.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01049.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnold, M. E., Nott, B. D., & Meinhold, J. L. (2012). The positive youth development inventory full version. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University.Google Scholar
  4. Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2015). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Using the BCH method in Mplus to estimate a distal outcome model and an arbitrary secondary model. Mplus Web Notes, 21(2), 1–22.Google Scholar
  5. California Department of Education. (n.d.). California school district secondary school survey results fall 2009/spring 2010: Core module A. Retrieved from http://chks.wested.org/resources/a-text_0910.pdf.
  6. Clark, S. L., & Muthén, B. (2009). Relating latent class analysis results to variables not included in the analysis. Los Angeles, CA: University of California. (Unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
  7. Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 430–457.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goodman, R. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 38, 581–586.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Greenspoon, P. J., & Saklofske, D. H. (2001). Toward an integration of subjective well-being and psychopathology. Social Indicators Research, 54, 81–108.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007219227883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Keyes, C. L. M. (2005). Mental illness and/or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete state model of health. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 73, 539–548.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.3.539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Keyes, C. L. M. (2006). Mental health in adolescence: Is America’s youth flourishing? American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 76, 395–402.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.76.3.395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim, E. K., Dowdy, E., Furlong, M. J., & You, S. (2017). Mental health profiles and quality of life among Korean adolescents. School Psychology International, 38, 98–116.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034316682296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., & Löwe, B. (2010). The Patient Health Questionnaire somatic, anxiety, and depressive symptom scales: A systematic review. General Hospital Psychiatry, 32, 345–359.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.03.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kuncel, N. R., Credé, M., & Thomas, L. L. (2005). The validity of self-reported grade point averages, class ranks, and test scores: A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75, 63–82.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075001063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Laursen, B., & Hoff, E. (2006). Person-centered and variable centered approaches to longitudinal data. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52, 377–389.  https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2006.0029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lyons, M. D., Huebner, E. S., & Hills, K. J. (2013). The dual-factor model of mental health: A short-term longitudinal study of school-related outcomes. Social Indicators Research, 114, 549–565.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0161-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lyons, M. D., Huebner, E. S., Hills, K. J., & Shinkareva, S. V. (2012). The dual-factor model of mental health: Further study of the determinants of group differences. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 27, 183–196.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573512443669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Masyn, K. E. (2013). Latent class analysis and finite mixture modeling. In T. D. Little (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods (pp. 551–611). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. McLachlan, G., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite mixture models. New York, NY: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Merikangas, K. R., Jian-ping, H., Burstein, M., Swanson, S. A., Avenevoli, S., Lihong, C., et al. (2010). Lifetime prevalence of mental disorders in US adolescents: Results from the National Comorbidity Study-Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A). Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 49, 980–989.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2010.05.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Merikangas, K. R., Nakamura, E., & Kessler, R. C. (2009). Epidemiology of mental disorders in children and adolescents. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 11, 7–20.Google Scholar
  22. Moore, S. A., Widales-Benitez, O., Carnazzo, K. W., Kim, E. K., Moffa, K., & Dowdy, E. (2015). Conducting universal complete mental health screening via student self-report. Contemporary School Psychology, 19, 253–267.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-015-0062-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th Ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  24. Nylund, K. L. (2007). Latent transition analysis: Modeling extensions and an application to peer victimization. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  25. Nylund, K., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2007a). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 535–569.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nylund, K., Bellmore, A., Nishina, A., & Graham, S. (2007b). Subtypes, severity, and structural stability of peer victimization: What does latent class analysis say? Child Development, 78(6), 1706–1722.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01097.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pilkauskaite-Valickiene, R. (2015). The role of character, confidence, and connection on contribution and subjective well-being. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 265–270.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ramaswamy, V., Desarbo, W. S., Reibstein, D. J., & Robinson, W. T. (1993). An empirical pooling approach for estimating marketing mix elasticities with PIMS data. Marketing Science, 12(1), 103–124.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.12.1.103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rebelez-Ernst, J. L. (2015). Capturing complete mental health among adolescents: Investigation of covitality latent class typologies. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
  30. Richardson, L., McCauley, E., & Katon, W. (2009). Collaborative care for adolescent depression: A pilot study. General Hospital Psychiatry, 31, 36–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2008.09.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ruchkin, V., Jones, S., Vermeiren, R., & Schwab-Stone, M. (2008). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: The self-report version in American urban and suburban youth. Psychological Assessment, 20, 175–182.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.20.2.175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Scales, P. C. (1999). Reducing risks and building developmental assets: Essential actions for promoting adolescent health. Journal of School Health, 69, l13–119.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.l746-1561.1999.tb07219.x.Google Scholar
  33. Schwartz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.  https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Seligson, J., Huebner, E. S., & Valois, R. F. (2003). Preliminary validation of the Brief Multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale (BMSLSS). Social Indicators Research, 61, 121–145.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021326822957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith, S. R. (2007). Making sense of multiple informants in child and adolescent psychopathology: A guide for clinicians. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 25, 139–149.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282906296233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith, B. H., Pelham, W. E., Jr., Gnagy, E., Molina, B., & Evans, S. (2000). The reliability, validity, and unique contributions of self-report by adolescents receiving treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 489–499.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006X.68.3.489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. W., & Löwe, B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166, 1092–1097.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sticca, F., Goetz, T., Bieg, M., Hall, N. C., Eberle, F., & Haag, L. (2017). Examining the accuracy of students’ self-reported academic grades from a correlational and a discrepancy perspective: Evidence from a longitudinal study. PLoS ONE, 12(11), e0187367.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Suldo, S. M., & Shaffer, E. J. (2008). Looking beyond psychopathology: The dual-factor model of mental health in youth. School Psychology Review, 37, 52–68.Google Scholar
  40. Suldo, S. M., Thalji-Raitano, A., Kiefer, S. M., & Ferron, J. M. (2016). Conceptualizing high school students’ mental health through a dual-factor model. School Psychology Review, 45, 434–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Venning, A., Wilson, A., Kettler, L., & Eliott, J. (2013). Mental health among youth in South Australia: A survey of flourishing, languishing, struggling, and floundering. Australian Psychologist, 48, 299–310.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-9544.2012.00068.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vermunt, J. K. (2004). Latent profile model. In M. S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, & T. F. Liao (Eds.), The Sage encyclopedia of social sciences research methods (pp. 554–555). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. von der Embse, N. P., Iaccarino, S., Mankin, A., Kilgus, S. P., & Magen, E. (2016). Development and validation of the social, academic, and emotional behavior risk screener—Student Rating Scale. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 42, 186–192.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508416679410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vuong, Q. H. (1989). Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica, 57, 307–333.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1912557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wasserman, L. (1997). Bayesian model selection and model averaging. Presented at mathematical psychology symposium “Methods for model selection,” Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
  46. Westerhof, G. B., & Keyes, C. L. M. (2010). Mental illness and mental health: The two-continua model across the lifespan. Journal of Adult Development, 17, 110–119.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-009-9082-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. World Health Organization. (2016). Mental health: Strengthening our response (Fact Sheet). Retrieved from www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs220/en/.
  48. You, S., Furlong, M. J., Dowdy, E., Renshaw, T., Smith, D. C., & O’Malley, M. D. (2014). Further validation of the social and emotional health survey for high school students. Applied Quality of Life Research, 9, 997–1015.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-013-9282-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mental HealthJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.University of California, Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations