Understanding the Organizational Implementation Context of Schools: A Qualitative Study of School District Administrators, Principals, and Teachers
- 333 Downloads
Key features of the school environment can have a significant impact on teachers’ effective use of evidence-based practices (EBP), yet implementation-specific organizational constructs have rarely been studied in the education sector. This study examined three aspects of the organizational implementation context (implementation leadership, climate, and citizenship behavior), which have been conceptualized and validated in other service settings. Focus groups with central office administrators, principals, and teachers were conducted to understand the applicability and conceptual boundaries of these organizational constructs in schools. Focus group transcripts were coded, and the results indicated both similarities and differences in their conceptualizations of implementation leadership, climate, and citizenship behavior in school. The data indicated that: (1) implementation leadership was largely present in schools with the addition of Distributed Leadership; (2) two implementation climate constructs were most clearly present (i.e., Focus on EBP and Educational Support for EBP) and two additional constructs (i.e., Existing Support to Deliver EBP and Prioritization of EBP) emerged as part of this construct; and (3) implementation citizenship behavior (Helping Others and Keeping Informed) was consistently acknowledged across schools and two new components emerged (i.e., Information Sharing and Observation/Feedback). Recommendations to researchers and community stakeholders are discussed.
KeywordsSchools Implementation Evidence-based practices Leadership Climate Citizenship behavior
This study was funded by R305A160114 (third and last author) awarded by the Institute of Education Sciences as well as K01MH100199 (first author) awarded from the National Institute of Mental Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or Institute of Education Sciences.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Beidas, R. S., Stewart, R. E., Adams, D. R., Fernandez, T., Lustbader, S., Powell, B. J., et al. (2016b). A multi-level examination of stakeholder perspectives of implementation of evidence-based practices in a large urban publicly-funded mental health system. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 43, 893–908.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bonham, C., Willging, C., Sommerfeld, D., & Aarons, G. A. (2014). Organizational factors influencing implementation of evidence-based practices for integrated treatment in behavioral health agencies. Psychiatry Journal, 2014, 1–9.Google Scholar
- Cook, C. R., Lyon, A. R., Locke, J., Waltz, T., & Powell, B. (submitted). Adapting a compilation of implementation strategies to advance school-based implementation research and practice. Prevention Science.Google Scholar
- Cook, B. G., & Odom, S. L. (2013). Evidence-based practices and implementation science in special education. Exceptional children, 79, 135–144.Google Scholar
- Ehrhart, M. G., Aarons, G. A., Torres, E. M., Finn, N. K., & Roesch, S. C. (2016). Implementation in child welfare: Leadership, climate, attitudes, and citizenship behavior. In Poster presented at the 31st annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Anaheim, CA.Google Scholar
- Farmer, E. M. Z., Burns, B. J., Phillips, S. D., Angold, A., & Costello, E. J. (2003). Pathways into and through mental health services for children and adolescents. Prevention Science, 54, 60–66.Google Scholar
- Feuerstein, J., Olswang, L. B., Greenslade, K., Pinder, G. L., Dowden, P., & Madden, J. (2017). Moving triadic gaze intervention into practice: Measuring clinician attitude and implementation fidelity. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60, 1285–1298.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Fixsen, D., Blase, K., Metz, A., & Van Dyke, M. (2013). Statewide implementation of evidence-based programs. Exceptional Children, 79, 213–230.Google Scholar
- Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blasé, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida.Google Scholar
- Lewis, C. C., Klasnja, P., Powell, B. J., Lyon, A. R., Tuzzio, L., Jones, S., Walsh-Bailey, C., & Weiner, B. (2018). From confusion to causality: Advancing understanding of mechanisms of change in implementation science.Google Scholar
- Locke, J., Beidas, R. S., Marcus, S., Stahmer, A. S., Aarons, G. A., Lyon, A. R., et al. (2016). A mixed methods study of individual and organizational factors that affect implementation of interventions for children with autism in public schools. Implementation Science, 11, 135.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Locke, J., Olsen, A., Wideman, R., Downey, M. M., Kretzmann, M., Kasari, C., et al. (2015). A tangled web: The challenges of implementing an evidence-based social engagement intervention for children with autism in urban public school settings. Behavior Therapy, 46, 54–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lyon, A., Cook, C., Brown, E., Locke, J., Davis, C., Ehrhart, M., et al. (2018). Assessing organizational implementation context in the education sector: Confirmatory factor analysis of measures of implementation leadership, climate, and citizenship. Implementation Science, 13, 5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lyon, A. R., Cook, C. R., Locke, J., Powell, B., & Waltz, T. (submitted). Importance and feasibility of an adapted set of strategies for implementing evidence-based behavioral health practices in the education sector. Journal of School Psychology.Google Scholar
- Malloy, M., Acock, A., DuBois, D. L., Vuchinich, S., Silverthorn, N., Ji, P., et al. (2015). Teachers’ perceptions of school organizational climate as predictors of dosage and quality of implementation of a social-emotional and character development program. Prevention Science, 16, 1086–1095.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Merikangas, K. R., He, J., Burstein, M., Swendsen, J., Avenevoli, S., Case, B., et al. (2011). Service utilization for lifetime mental disorders in U.S. adolescents: Results of the National Comorbidity Survey-Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A). Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 50, 32–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Odom, S. L., Cox, A. W., Brock, M. E., & National Professional Development Center on ASD. (2013). Implementation science, professional development, and autism spectrum disorders. Exceptional Children, 79, 233–251.Google Scholar
- Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2005). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Sanetti, L. M. H., Knight, A., Cochrane, W., & Minster, M. (in preparation). Reporting of implementation fidelity of interventions with children in the school psychology literature from 2009 to 2017.Google Scholar