Advertisement

Reliability of stemless shoulder arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis: observation of early lysis around the humeral component

  • R. W. JordanEmail author
  • G. Manoharan
  • M. Van Liefland
  • R. Dodenhoff
  • S. M. Hay
  • C. P. Kelly
  • R. P. Potter
Original Article
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate whether stemless shoulder implants in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients provide comparable functional outcomes to patients with osteoarthritis or post-traumatic arthritis. In addition, the study assessed for differences in incidence of radiolucent lines or proximal humeral bone loss during radiographic follow-up.

Methods

Consecutive stemless shoulder arthroplasties performed in RA patients and a matched control group were retrospectively identified between February 2012 and 2018. Thirty-five patients were included in each group: 24 total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and 11 hemiarthroplasty (HA). Patients were evaluated annually using the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and radiographically.

Results

The mean OSS significantly improved in all groups until 24 months. The mean improvement for RA TSA and HA patients at 24 months was 19.86 (95% CI 10.66–29.05, p = 0.0004) and 19.71 (95% CI 7.33–32.31, p = 0.0084), respectively. The mean improvement in the control TSA and HA patients at 24 months was 20.86 (95% CI 17–24.71, p = 0.0001) and 17.86 (95% CI 1.36–34.35, p = 0.0381), respectively. During the study period, two patients in the RA TSA group (8%), one patient in the control TSA group (4%) and one patient in the control HA group (9%) required revision. The proportion of progressive proximal humeral bone loss after TSA was 33% in the RA group and 13% in the control group.

Conclusion

Stemless shoulder implants can provide significant improvement in functional scores in RA patients in the short term. However, early bone loss around the humeral implant is a concern and the authors recommend long-term clinical and radiological follow-up.

Keywords

Stemless shoulder replacements Shoulder arthroplasty Rheumatoid arthritis Inflammatory arthropathy 

Notes

Funding

No funding was received during the production of this manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Mr Robert Jordan is undertaking at fellowship funded by Mathys Ltd., Bettlach. Mr Cormac Kelly is a Consultant for: Mathys Ltd., Bettlach. The remaining authors have no conflicts to declare.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. 1.
    Trail IA, Nutall D (2002) The results of shoulder arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg 84(8):1121–1125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Levy O, Funk L, Sforza G, Copeland SA (2004) Copeland surface replacement arthroplasty of the shoulder in rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg 86:512–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Christie A, Dagfinrud H, Rinen HO, Hagen KB (2011) Beneficial and harmful effects of shoulder arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a Cochrane review. Rheumatology 50(3):598–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ten Voorde PC, Rasmussen JV, Olssen BS, Brorson S (2015) Resurfacing shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of severe rheumatoid arthritis. Outcome in 167 patients from the Danish Shoulder Registry. Acta Orthop 86(3):293–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS (2007) Total shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis of the shoulder: results of 303 consecutive cases. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16(6):683–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Holcomb JO, Herbert J, Mighell MA, Dunning PE, Pupello DR, Pliner MD, Frankle MA (2010) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19:1076–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barlow JD, Yuan BJ, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS, Cofield RH, Sperling JW (2014) Shoulder arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis: 303 consecutive cases with minimum 5-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23:791–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gee EC, Hanson EK, Saithna A (2015) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review. Open Orthop J 9:237–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Santori N, Lucidi M, Santori FS (2006) Proximal load transfer with a stemless uncemented femoral implant. J Orthop Traumatol 7:154–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Churchill RS (2014) Stemless shoulder arthroplasty: current status. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23:1409–1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Churchill RS, Athwal GS (2016) Stemless shoulder arthroplasty—current results and designs. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 9(1):10–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Athwal GS (2016) Spare the canal: stemless shoulder arthroplasty is finally here: commentary on an article by R. Sean Churcill, MD, et al: “Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Simpliciti canal-sparing shoulder arthroplasty system; a prospective two-year multicentre study”. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98:e28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Razfar N, Reeves JM, Langohr DG, Willing R, Athwal GS, Johnson JA (2015) Comparison of proximal humeral bones stresses between stemless, short stem, and standard stem length: a finite element analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 25(7):1076–1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hawi N, Tauber M, Messina MJ, Habermeyer P, Martetschlager F (2016) Anatomic stemless shoulder arthroplasty and related outcomes: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 17:376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zwartele RE, Witjes S, Doets C, Stijnen T, Poll RG (2012) Cementless total hip arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132(4):535–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Radnay CS, Setter KJ, Chambers L, Levine WN, Bigliani LU, Ahmad CS (2007) Total shoulder replacement compared with humeral head replacement for the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16:396–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Abu-Amer Y, Darwech I, Clohisy JC (2007) Aseptic loosening of total joint replacements: mechanisms underlying osteolysis and potential therapies. Arthritis Res Ther 9(Suppl 1):S6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Khosla S (2001) Minireview: the OPG/RANKL/RANK system. Endocrinology 142:5050–5055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Abu-Amer Y (2005) Advances in osteoclast differentiation and function. Curr Drug Targets Immune Endocr Metabol Disord 5:347–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Raiss P, Edwards TB, Deutsch A, Shah A, Bruckner T, Loew M et al (2014) Radiographic changes around humeral components in shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:e54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Haugeberg G, Uhlig T, Falch JA, Halse JI, Kvien TK (2000) Bone mineral density and frequency of osteoporosis in female patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 43:522–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hirakawa K, Jacobs JJ, Urban R, Saito T (2004) Mechanisms of failure of total hip replacements: lessons learned from retrieval studies. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420:10–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nagels J, Stokdijk M, Rozing PM (2003) Stress shielding and bone resorption in shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 12:35–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Spormann C, Durchholz H, Audig L, Flury M, Schwyzer HK, Simmen BR, Kolling C (2014) Patterns of proximal humeral bone resorption after total shoulder arthroplasty with an uncemented rectangular stem. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23:1028–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Matsen FA 3rd, Iannotti JP, Rockweood CA Jr (2003) Humeral fixation by press-fitting of a tapered metaphyseal stem: a prospective radiographic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:304–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Trancik T, Mills W, Vinson N (1989) The effect of indomethacin, Aspirin, and ibuprofen on the bone growth into a porous-coated implant. Clin Orthop 249:113–121Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wheeler DL, van der Griend RA, Wronski TJ et al (1995) The short- and long-term effects of methotrexate on the rat skeleton. Bone 16:215–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Crossan JF, Vallance R (1982) The shoulder joint in rheumatoid arthritis. In: Bayley I, Kessel L (eds) Shoulder surgery. Springer, Berlin, pp 131–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lehtinen JT, Belt EA, Kauppi MJ, Kaarela K, Kuusela PP, Kautiainen HJ et al (2001) Bone destruction, upward migration, and medialization of rheumatoid shoulder: a 15-year prospective follow-up study. Ann Rheum 60:322–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lehtinen JT, Kaarela K, Belt EA, Kautiainen HJ, Kauppi MJ, Lehto MU (2000) Incidence of glenohumeral joint involvement in seropositive rheumatoid arthritis. A 15 year endpoint study. J Rheumatol 27(2):347–350PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Larsen A, Dale K, Eek M (1977) Radiographic evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis and related conditions by standard reference films. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 18(4):481–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tanaka H, Sugamoto K, Sahara W, Ono T, Tomita T, Hashimoto J, Yoshikawa H (2007) The mode of destruction in shoulders with rheumatoid arthritis based on radiographic findings. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16(5):539–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ravi B, Escott B, Shah PS, Jenkinson R, Chahal J, Bogoch E, Kreder H, Hawker G (2012) A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing complications following total joint arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis versus for osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 64(12):3839–3849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Somayaji R, Barnabe C, Martin L (2013) Risk factors for infection following total joint arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis. Open Rheumatol J 7:119–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lehtinen JT, Belt EA, Lybäck CO, Kauppi MJ, Kaarela K, Kautiainen HJ, Lehto MUK (2000) Subacromial space in the rheumatoid shoulder: a radiographic 15-year follow-up study of 148 shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 9:183–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Trappey GJ, O’Connor DP, Bradley Edwards T (2011) What are the instability and infection rates after reverse shoulder arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:2505–2511CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. W. Jordan
    • 1
    Email author
  • G. Manoharan
    • 1
  • M. Van Liefland
    • 1
  • R. Dodenhoff
    • 1
  • S. M. Hay
    • 1
  • C. P. Kelly
    • 1
  • R. P. Potter
    • 1
  1. 1.Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt HospitalGobowen, OswestryUK

Personalised recommendations